auth-quickstart
- Repo stars 0
- Author updated Live
- Author repo skills-registry
- Domain
- DevOps
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @tomevault-io · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Manual integration
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Docker
- Runtime requirements
- Python · Docker
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Env read
- Network behavior
- External requests
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: auth-quickstart
description: Scaffold a new FastAPI microservice from zero with ab0t-auth already integrated. Use when creati…
category: devops
runtime: Python / Docker
---
# auth-quickstart output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Scaffold a new FastAPI microservice from zero with ab0t-auth already integrated. Use when creating a brand new service that doesn't exist yet, bootstrapping a project from scratch, or when the user says "new service", "start from scratch", "scaffold", "quickstart", "create a new API", or "bootstrap". Generates a complete project structure with auth guard, permission scheme, type aliases, example CRUD routes, config, Dockerfile, and registration-ready .permissions.json. NOT for adding auth to an existing service (use auth_fastapi_skill for that). Use when this capability is needed..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “When to Use This vs authfastapiskill / Scaffold Workflow / Step 1: Gather Requirements” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Scaffold a new FastAPI microservice from zero with ab0t-auth already integrated. Use when creating a brand new service that doesn't exist yet, bootstrapping a project from scratch, or when the user says "new service", "start from scratch", "scaffold", "quickstart", "create a new API", or "bootstrap". Generates a complete project structure with auth guard, permission scheme, type aliases, example CRUD routes, config, Dockerfile, and registration-ready .permissions.json. NOT for adding auth to an existing service (use auth_fastapi_skill for that). Use when this capability is needed.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “When to Use This vs authfastapiskill / Scaffold Workflow / Step 1: Gather Requirements” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/health`, `/items`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “When to Use This vs authfastapiskill / Scaffold Workflow / Step 1: Gather Requirements”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: auth-quickstart
description: Scaffold a new FastAPI microservice from zero with ab0t-auth already integrated. Use when creati…
category: devops
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# auth-quickstart
## When to use
- Scaffold a new FastAPI microservice from zero with ab0t-auth already integrated. Use when creating a brand new service…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “When to Use This vs authfastapiskill / Scaffold Workflow / Step 1: Gather Requirements” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "auth-quickstart" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> When to Use This vs authfastapiskill / Scaffold Workflow / Step 1: Gather Requirements
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> Python / Docker | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables | may access external network resources
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Auth Quickstart: Zero to Running Service
Scaffold a complete FastAPI service with ab0t-auth baked in from the start.
When to Use This vs auth_fastapi_skill
| Situation | Use |
|---|---|
| No code exists yet | This skill |
| Existing service needs auth added | auth_fastapi_skill |
| Need to understand permission design in depth | auth_fastapi_skill |
| Need scenario walkthroughs by industry | auth_service_ab0t |
Scaffold Workflow
Step 1: Gather Requirements
Ask the user for:
- Service name — human-readable (e.g., "Invoice Service")
- Service slug — lowercase identifier (e.g.,
invoices). Used in permissions, audience, file names. - Domain resources — the nouns (e.g., invoices, payments, customers)
- Actions per resource — the verbs (e.g., read, write, create, delete, send, approve)
- Maintainer email — for
.permissions.json
If the user is vague, suggest reasonable defaults and confirm.
Step 2: Copy and Customize Template
The template lives in assets/template/. Copy the entire directory to the user's target path, then replace all placeholders:
| Placeholder | Replace with |
|---|---|
__SERVICE_NAME__ |
Human-readable name |
__SERVICE_SLUG__ |
Lowercase slug |
__SERVICE_DESCRIPTION__ |
One-line description |
__MAINTAINER_EMAIL__ |
Contact email |
Files to customize:
.permissions.json— Replace starter permissions with real ones derived from the user's resources and actions. Follow the{slug}.{action}.{resource}format. Setadmin.impliesto include all lower permissions. Never implycross_tenant.app/auth.py— Replace starter type aliases (Reader,Writer,Admin) with domain-specific aliases matching the permissions. Example for an invoice service:InvoiceReader = Annotated[AuthenticatedUser, Depends( require_permission(auth, "invoices.read", check=belongs_to_org))] InvoiceSender = Annotated[AuthenticatedUser, Depends( require_permission(auth, "invoices.send", check=belongs_to_org))]app/api/items.py— Rename to match the primary resource (e.g.,invoices.py). Replace the example routes with real ones using the domain-specific type aliases. Keep the same auth patterns (list with filter, get with Phase 2, create without Phase 2, delete with Phase 2, admin-only).app/main.py— Update the router import and prefix to match the renamed module.app/config.py— Add any service-specific settings.
Step 3: Verify Structure
After customization, the project should have:
my-service/
├── app/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── main.py # FastAPI app with auth lifespan
│ ├── config.py # Pydantic settings
│ ├── auth.py # AuthGuard, type aliases, Phase 2, check callbacks
│ └── api/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── health.py # Unauthenticated health check
│ └── {resource}.py # Auth-protected CRUD routes
├── .permissions.json # Permission definitions for registration
├── .env.example # Environment variable reference
├── .gitignore # Excludes credentials/, .env, etc.
├── requirements.txt # Dependencies including ab0t-auth
└── Dockerfile # Production container
Step 4: Run Locally
cd my-service
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env # Edit values
# Development with auth bypass
AB0T_AUTH_DEBUG=true AB0T_AUTH_BYPASS=true uvicorn app.main:app --reload
Verify:
GET /healthreturns{"status": "ok"}(no auth)GET /items/returns data with bypass user (auth bypassed)- Routes return proper 401/403 JSON when bypass is off and no token is provided
Step 5: Guide Next Steps
After the scaffold is running, point the user to references/next-steps.md for:
- Adding more permissions and type aliases
- Adding check callbacks (suspension, quota)
- Wiring up Phase 2 ownership verification with a real database
- Registering with the auth service
- Multi-tenancy setup
- Middleware for blanket auth
- Production checklist
For deep dives, reference the auth_fastapi_skill:
- permissions-design.md — full schema and design principles
- route-patterns.md — all 7 route protection patterns
- implementation-details.md — all 19 type aliases, check callbacks
- registration.md — auth service registration walkthrough
Permission Design Quick Reference
Format: {slug}.{action} or {slug}.{action}.{resource}
| Action | Meaning | Risk |
|---|---|---|
read |
View without side effects | low |
write |
Modify existing records | medium |
create |
Create new records | medium |
delete |
Permanently remove | high |
execute |
Run user-provided code | high |
admin |
Full org-level access (implies lower perms) | critical |
cross_tenant |
Cross-org access (NEVER implied by admin) | critical |
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to rename placeholders — grep for
__SERVICEafter scaffolding to catch any missed replacements - Skipping Phase 2 — every route with
/{id}in the path needsverify_resource_access()after the DB fetch - Implying
cross_tenantfromadmin— never do this; it must be a conscious separate grant - Unscoped list queries — always use
get_user_filter(user)for list/search routes - 404 after 403 — always check resource exists (404) before checking access (403)
Source: ab0t-com/auth_wrapper — distributed by TomeVault.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review