axiom-scan-security-privacy

Engineering Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Engineering
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@CharlesWiltgen · MIT
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Required · Vendor-specific
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Env read
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview axiom-scan-security-privacy.preview
---
name: axiom-scan-security-privacy
description: Use when the user mentions security review, App Store submission prep, Privacy Manifest requirem…
category: engineering
runtime: no special runtime
---

# axiom-scan-security-privacy output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Use when the user mentions security review, App Store submission prep, Privacy Manifest requirements, hardcoded credentials, or sensitive data storage. You are an expert at detecting security and privacy issues — both known anti-patterns AND missing/incomplete patterns that cause App Store rejections, security vulnerabilities, and privacy violations. requ….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Tool Use Is Mandatory / Files to Scan / Phase 1: Map Security & Privacy Posture” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Use when the user mentions security review, App Store submission prep, Privacy Manifest requirements, hardcoded credentials, or sensitive data storage. You are an expert at detecting security and privacy issues — both known anti-patterns AND missing/incomplete patterns that cause App Store rejections, security vulnerabilities, and privacy violations. requ…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Tool Use Is Mandatory / Files to Scan / Phase 1: Map Security & Privacy Posture” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, read environment variables; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, read environment variables; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Use when the user mentions security review, App Store submission prep, Privacy Manifest requirements, hardcoded credentials, or…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Tool Use Is Mandatory”, “Files to Scan”, “Phase 1: Map Security & Privacy Posture”, “Step 1: Identify Privacy Manifest and Entitlements”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name axiom-scan-security-privacy directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Tool Use Is Mandatory / Files to Scan / Phase 1: Map Security & Privacy Posture” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare Vendor-specific API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / env-read; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.