bom-cost-optimizer
- Repo stars 1
- Author repo claude-skills
BOM Cost Optimizer
Overview
Propose lower-cost bill-of-material substitutions while preserving critical requirements, interfaces, and risk constraints.
Core Workflow
- Inspect the relevant diffs, configs, source files, or artifacts before forming a conclusion.
- Compare the current state against repo conventions, expected guarantees, and known risk areas.
- Prioritize the highest-impact gaps, regressions, or improvement opportunities instead of surface-level noise.
- Recommend the smallest high-leverage changes and the checks that would validate them.
Deliver
- Ranked findings or improvement opportunities with clear evidence.
- The main risks, tradeoffs, or regressions that matter most.
- Validation steps or follow-up edits that would reduce risk.
Guardrails
- Lead with findings, not generic praise or low-value commentary.
- Use repo evidence and surrounding context instead of reviewing in isolation.
- Flag missing validation when a recommendation depends on behavior you could not confirm.
- Avoid commands that actuate hardware, move robots, or change live controller state unless explicitly requested.
- Fluxly category
- Engineering
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @00PrabalK00 · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- Unspecified
- Runtime requirements
- Unspecified
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Detected network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. Propose lower-cost bill-of-material substitutions while preserving critical requirements, interfaces, and risk constraints.
Inspect the relevant diffs, configs, source files, or artifacts before forming a conclusion. Compare the current state against repo conventions, expected guarantees, and known risk areas. Prioritize the highest-impact gaps, regressions, or improvement…
Ranked findings or improvement opportunities with clear evidence. The main risks, tradeoffs, or regressions that matter most. Validation steps or follow-up edits that would reduce risk.
Lead with findings, not generic praise or low-value commentary. Use repo evidence and surrounding context instead of reviewing in isolation. Flag missing validation when a recommendation depends on behavior you could not confirm.
# BOM Cost Optimizer
## Overview
Propose lower-cost bill-of-material substitutions while preserving critical requirements, interfaces, and risk constraints.
## Core Workflow
1. Inspect the relevant diffs, configs, source files, or artifacts before forming a conclusion.
2. Compare the current state against repo conventions, expected guarantees, and known risk areas.
3. Prioritize the highest-impact gaps, regressions, or improvement opportunities instead of surface-level noise.
4. Recommend the smallest high-leverage changes and the checks that would validate them.
## Deliver
- Ranked findings or improvement opportunities with clear evidence.
- The main risks, tradeoffs, or regressions that matter most.
- Validation steps or follow-up edits that would reduce risk.
## Guardrails
- Lead with findings, not generic praise or low-value commentary.
- Use repo evidence and surrounding context instead of reviewing in isolation.
- Flag missing validation when a recommendation depends on behavior you could not confirm.
- Avoid commands that actuate hardware, move robots, or change live controller state unless explicitly requested. Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> Overview → Core Workflow → Deliver → Guardrails
terms -> Propose lower-cost bill-of-material substitutions while preserving critical requirements, interfaces, and risk constraints. · 1. Inspect the relevant diffs, configs, source files, or artifacts before forming a conclusion. · - Ranked findings or improvement opportunities with clear evidence. · - Lead with findings, not generic praise or low-value commentary.
files/cmd -> no explicit files or commands
body sha256 -> 678e0a9c6d85
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review