branch-management

Engineering Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Engineering
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@ZTE-AICloud · MIT
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
Linux · Windows
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
Network behavior
Local-only
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview branch-management.preview
---
name: branch-management
description: 本 Skill 的详细逻辑已整合于上文步骤中;脚本参数、JSON 输出格式等以 create-new-feature 与 check-prerequisites 脚本的文档为准。执行本 Ski…
category: engineering
runtime: no special runtime
---

# branch-management output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: 本 Skill 的详细逻辑已整合于上文步骤中;脚本参数、JSON 输出格式等以 create-new-feature 与 check-prerequisites 脚本的文档为准。执行本 Skill 时,AI Agent 应按上述步骤完成解析、校验与分支/目录创建或复用。 runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “概览(职责与输入输出) / 输入与前置条件 / 核心步骤(对应原命令文档)” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “本 Skill 的详细逻辑已整合于上文步骤中;脚本参数、JSON 输出格式等以 create-new-feature 与 check-prerequisites 脚本的文档为准。执行本 Skill 时,AI Agent 应按上述步骤完成解析、校验与分支/目录创建或复用。 runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “概览(职责与输入输出) / 输入与前置条件 / 核心步骤(对应原命令文档)” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: 本 Skill 的详细逻辑已整合于上文步骤中;脚本参数、JSON 输出格式等以 create-new-feature 与 check-prerequisites 脚本的文档为准。执行本 Skill 时,AI Agent 应按上述步骤完成解析、校验与分支/目…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “概览(职责与输入输出)”, “输入与前置条件”, “核心步骤(对应原命令文档)”, “步骤0(可选):获取环境信息(REPOROOT)”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name branch-management directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “概览(职责与输入输出) / 输入与前置条件 / 核心步骤(对应原命令文档)” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.