bug-reproduction-root-cause-hunter
- Repo stars 1
- Author repo claude-skills
Bug Reproduction Root Cause Hunter
Overview
Turn loose bug reports into a repeatable debugging workflow with evidence at each step.
Core Workflow
- Normalize the report. Capture expected behavior, actual behavior, exact errors, inputs, and environment details.
- Reproduce the failure. Use existing tests, app commands, logs, or a minimal repro path before theorizing.
- Narrow the surface. Identify the smallest set of files, conditions, flags, data states, or requests needed to trigger the bug.
- Test hypotheses. Inspect recent diffs, surrounding code, and related tests to validate likely causes.
- Propose the fix path. Recommend the smallest safe change, the regression test to add, and any rollout concerns.
Deliver
- Provide exact repro steps when reproduction succeeds.
- State the most likely root cause with concrete evidence.
- If reproduction fails, document what was tried, what remains plausible, and the next best experiment.
- Keep the fix plan separate from the diagnosis.
Guardrails
- Do not claim certainty without evidence.
- Prefer recent changes and environment differences as early suspects, not automatic conclusions.
- Preserve any raw error output needed to debug further.
- Fluxly category
- Engineering
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @00PrabalK00 · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- Unspecified
- Runtime requirements
- Unspecified
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Detected network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. Turn loose bug reports into a repeatable debugging workflow with evidence at each step.
Normalize the report. Capture expected behavior, actual behavior, exact errors, inputs, and environment details. Reproduce the failure. Use existing tests, app commands, logs, or a minimal repro path before theorizing. Narrow the surface. Identify the smallest…
Provide exact repro steps when reproduction succeeds. State the most likely root cause with concrete evidence. If reproduction fails, document what was tried, what remains plausible, and the next best experiment.
Do not claim certainty without evidence. Prefer recent changes and environment differences as early suspects, not automatic conclusions. Preserve any raw error output needed to debug further.
# Bug Reproduction Root Cause Hunter
## Overview
Turn loose bug reports into a repeatable debugging workflow with evidence at each step.
## Core Workflow
1. Normalize the report. Capture expected behavior, actual behavior, exact errors, inputs, and environment details.
2. Reproduce the failure. Use existing tests, app commands, logs, or a minimal repro path before theorizing.
3. Narrow the surface. Identify the smallest set of files, conditions, flags, data states, or requests needed to trigger the bug.
4. Test hypotheses. Inspect recent diffs, surrounding code, and related tests to validate likely causes.
5. Propose the fix path. Recommend the smallest safe change, the regression test to add, and any rollout concerns.
## Deliver
- Provide exact repro steps when reproduction succeeds.
- State the most likely root cause with concrete evidence.
- If reproduction fails, document what was tried, what remains plausible, and the next best experiment.
- Keep the fix plan separate from the diagnosis.
## Guardrails
- Do not claim certainty without evidence.
- Prefer recent changes and environment differences as early suspects, not automatic conclusions.
- Preserve any raw error output needed to debug further. Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> Overview → Core Workflow → Deliver → Guardrails
terms -> Turn loose bug reports into a repeatable debugging workflow with evidence at each step. · 1. Normalize the report. · - Provide exact repro steps when reproduction succeeds. · - Do not claim certainty without evidence.
files/cmd -> no explicit files or commands
body sha256 -> b7bb8ca9d367
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review