commit
- Repo stars 846
- Author updated Live
- Author repo modbus
- Domain
- Engineering
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @digitalpetri · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools，默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: commit
description: Create git commits with user approval You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes m…
category: engineering
runtime: no special runtime
---
# commit output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Create git commits with user approval You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes made during this session. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Process / Remember” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Create git commits with user approval You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes made during this session. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Process / Remember” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. Choose the trigger
The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Provide inputs and boundaries
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Validate with a small run
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Process / Remember”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Review before delivery
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: commit
description: Create git commits with user approval You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes m…
category: engineering
source: digitalpetri/modbus
---
# commit
## When to use
- Create git commits with user approval You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes made during this sessio…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Process / Remember” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. Evidence boundary and execution chain
The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "commit" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Process / Remember
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
}You are tasked with creating git commits for the changes made during this session.
Process
Think about what changed:
- Review the conversation history and understand what was achieved
- Run
git statusto see current changes - Run
git diffto understand the modifications - Consider whether changes should be one commit or multiple logical commits
Plan your commit(s):
- Identify which files belong together
- Draft clear, descriptive commit messages
- Use imperative mood in commit messages
- Focus on why the changes were made, not just what
Present your plan to the user:
- List the files you plan to add for each commit
- Show the commit message(s) you'll use
- Ask: "I plan to create [N] commit(s) with these changes. Shall I proceed?"
Execute upon confirmation:
- Use
git addwith specific files (never use-Aor.) - Create commits with your planned messages
- Show the result with
git log --oneline -n [number]
- Use
Remember
- You have the full context of what was done in this session
- Group related changes together
- Keep commits focused and atomic when possible
- The user trusts your judgment – they asked you to commit
- Write commit messages as if the user wrote them
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review