comp-analysis
- Repo stars 19,014
- Author updated Live
- Author repo knowledge-work-plugins
- Domain
- Data
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @anthropics · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: comp-analysis
description: Analyze compensation — benchmarking, band placement, and equity modeling. Trigger with "what sho…
category: data
runtime: no special runtime
---
# comp-analysis output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Analyze compensation — benchmarking, band placement, and equity modeling. Trigger with "what should we pay a [role]", "is this offer competitive", "model this equity grant", or when uploading comp data to find outliers and retention risks..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Usage / What I Need From You / Compensation Framework” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Analyze compensation — benchmarking, band placement, and equity modeling. Trigger with "what should we pay a [role]", "is this offer competitive", "model this equity grant", or when uploading comp data to find outliers and retention risks.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Usage / What I Need From You / Compensation Framework” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/comp-analysis`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Usage / What I Need From You / Compensation Framework”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: comp-analysis
description: Analyze compensation — benchmarking, band placement, and equity modeling. Trigger with "what sho…
category: data
source: anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
---
# comp-analysis
## When to use
- Analyze compensation — benchmarking, band placement, and equity modeling. Trigger with "what should we pay a [role]"…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Usage / What I Need From You / Compensation Framework” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "comp-analysis" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Usage / What I Need From You / Compensation Framework
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} /comp-analysis
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Analyze compensation data for benchmarking, band placement, and planning. Helps benchmark compensation against market data for hiring, retention, and equity planning.
Usage
/comp-analysis $ARGUMENTS
What I Need From You
Option A: Single role analysis "What should we pay a Senior Software Engineer in SF?"
Option B: Upload comp data Upload a CSV or paste your comp bands. I'll analyze placement, identify outliers, and compare to market.
Option C: Equity modeling "Model a refresh grant of 10K shares over 4 years at a $50 stock price."
Compensation Framework
Components of Total Compensation
- Base salary: Cash compensation
- Equity: RSUs, stock options, or other equity
- Bonus: Annual target bonus, signing bonus
- Benefits: Health, retirement, perks (harder to quantify)
Key Variables
- Role: Function and specialization
- Level: IC levels, management levels
- Location: Geographic pay adjustments
- Company stage: Startup vs. growth vs. public
- Industry: Tech vs. finance vs. healthcare
Data Sources
- With ~~compensation data: Pull verified benchmarks
- Without: Use web research, public salary data, and user-provided context
- Always note data freshness and source limitations
Output
Provide percentile bands (25th, 50th, 75th, 90th) for base, equity, and total comp. Include location adjustments and company-stage context.
## Compensation Analysis: [Role/Scope]
### Market Benchmarks
| Percentile | Base | Equity | Total Comp |
|------------|------|--------|------------|
| 25th | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| 50th | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| 75th | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| 90th | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
**Sources:** [Web research, compensation data tools, or user-provided data]
### Band Analysis (if data provided)
| Employee | Current Base | Band Min | Band Mid | Band Max | Position |
|----------|-------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
| [Name] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | [Below/At/Above] |
### Recommendations
- [Specific compensation recommendations]
- [Equity considerations]
- [Retention risks if applicable]
If Connectors Available
If ~~compensation data is connected:
- Pull verified market benchmarks by role, level, and location
- Compare your bands against real-time market data
If ~~HRIS is connected:
- Pull current employee comp data for band analysis
- Identify outliers and retention risks automatically
Tips
- Location matters — Always specify location for benchmarking. SF vs. Austin vs. London are very different.
- Total comp, not just base — Include equity, bonus, and benefits for a complete picture.
- Keep data confidential — Comp data is sensitive. Results stay in your conversation.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review