ctf-web

Engineering Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Engineering
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@ljagiello · MIT
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Manual integration
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
macOS · Linux · Windows · Docker
Runtime requirements
Node.js · Python · Docker
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
  • Env read
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview ctf-web.preview
---
name: ctf-web
description: Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTT…
category: engineering
runtime: Node.js / Python / Docker
---

# ctf-web output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser client, template engine, identity flow, or smart-contract frontend/backend surface, including XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, XXE, JWT, auth bypass, file upload, request smuggling, OAuth/OIDC, SAML, prototype pollution, and similar web bugs. Do not use it for native binary memory corruption, reverse engineering of standalone executables, disk or memory forensics, or pure cryptanalysis unless the web flaw is still the main path to the flag..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Prerequisites / Additional Resources / When to Pivot” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser client, template engine, identity flow, or smart-contract frontend/backend surface, including XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, XXE, JWT, auth bypass, file upload, request smuggling, OAuth/OIDC, SAML, prototype pollution, and similar web bugs. Do not use it for native binary memory corruption, reverse engineering of standalone executables, disk or memory forensics, or pure cryptanalysis unless the web flaw is still the main path to the flag.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Prerequisites / Additional Resources / When to Pivot” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser clie…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Prerequisites”, “Additional Resources”, “When to Pivot”, “First-Pass Workflow”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name ctf-web directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Prerequisites / Additional Resources / When to Pivot” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec / env-read; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.