fluxly Search skills… ⌘K 中文 Publish

debugging-dags

DevOps Community
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
DevOps
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
88 / 100 · community maintained
Author / version / license
@diegosouzapw · no license declared
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Plug-and-play
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
Windows
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
Network behavior
Local-only
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools，默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview debugging-dags.preview 
---
name: debugging-dags
description: Comprehensive DAG failure diagnosis and root cause analysis. Use for complex debugging requests…
category: devops
runtime: no special runtime
---

# debugging-dags output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Comprehensive DAG failure diagnosis and root cause analysis. Use for complex debugging requests requiring deep investigation like "diagnose and fix the pipeline", "full root cause analysis", "why is this failing and how to prevent it". For simple debugging ("why did dag fail", "show logs"), the airflow entrypoint skill handles it directly. This skill provides structured investigation and prevention recommendations..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Running the CLI / Step 1: Identify the Failure / Step 2: Get the Error Details” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Comprehensive DAG failure diagnosis and root cause analysis. Use for complex debugging requests requiring deep investigation like "diagnose and fix the pipeline", "full root cause analysis", "why is this failing and how to prevent it". For simple debugging ("why did dag fail", "show logs"), the airflow entrypoint skill handles it directly. This skill provides structured investigation and prevention recommendations.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Running the CLI / Step 1: Identify the Failure / Step 2: Get the Error Details” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Comprehensive DAG failure diagnosis and root cause analysis. Use for complex debugging requests requiring deep investigation lik…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Running the CLI”, “Step 1: Identify the Failure”, “Step 2: Get the Error Details”, “Step 3: Check Context”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name debugging-dags directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Running the CLI / Step 1: Identify the Failure / Step 2: Get the Error Details” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.