egg

AI Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
AI
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@eggjs · MIT
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Plug-and-play
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
Network behavior
Local-only
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview egg.preview
---
name: egg
description: 本技能帮助根据用户意图和任务类型确定使用哪个专用的 EGG 技能。EGG 文档组织为两个主要领域: 询问:用户是在询问构建块/框架内部 OR 实现特定接口? 如果用户的意图可能是核心 OR 控…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---

# egg output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: 本技能帮助根据用户意图和任务类型确定使用哪个专用的 EGG 技能。EGG 文档组织为两个主要领域: 询问:用户是在询问构建块/框架内部 OR 实现特定接口? 如果用户的意图可能是核心 OR 控制器(例如,"如何实现一个需要跨模块访问的服务?"): 理由:即使服务将在控制器中使用,关于跨模块访问(AccessLevel)的基本问题是一个核心概念。一旦理解了核心结构,用户就可以在控制器中应用它。 runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “概述 / 技能选择逻辑 / 使用 egg-core skill 当用户询问:” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “本技能帮助根据用户意图和任务类型确定使用哪个专用的 EGG 技能。EGG 文档组织为两个主要领域: 询问:用户是在询问构建块/框架内部 OR 实现特定接口? 如果用户的意图可能是核心 OR 控制器(例如,"如何实现一个需要跨模块访问的服务?"): 理由:即使服务将在控制器中使用,关于跨模块访问(AccessLevel)的基本问题是一个核心概念。一旦理解了核心结构,用户就可以在控制器中应用它。 runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “概述 / 技能选择逻辑 / 使用 egg-core skill 当用户询问:” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: 本技能帮助根据用户意图和任务类型确定使用哪个专用的 EGG 技能。EGG 文档组织为两个主要领域: 询问:用户是在询问构建块/框架内部 OR 实现特定接口? 如果用户的意图可能是核心 OR 控制器(例如,"如何实现一个需要跨模块访问的服务?"): 理由:即…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “概述”, “技能选择逻辑”, “使用 egg-core skill 当用户询问:”, “使用 egg-controller skill 当用户询问:”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name egg directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “概述 / 技能选择逻辑 / 使用 egg-core skill 当用户询问:” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.