harness-eval

AI Verified v0.2.0
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
AI
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
92 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@HKUDS · v0.2.0 · no license declared
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Required · Anthropic
Operating systems
macOS · Linux · Windows
Runtime requirements
Python
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview harness-eval.preview
---
name: harness-eval
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "test the harness", "run integration tests", "va…
category: ai
runtime: Python
---

# harness-eval output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: This skill should be used when the user asks to "test the harness", "run integration tests", "validate features with real API", "test with real model calls", "run agent loop tests", "verify end-to-end", or needs to verify OpenHarness features on a real codebase with actual LLM calls. Validate OpenHarness features by running real agent loops against an unf….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Core Principles / Workflow / 1. Prepare Workspace” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “This skill should be used when the user asks to "test the harness", "run integration tests", "validate features with real API", "test with real model calls", "run agent loop tests", "verify end-to-end", or needs to verify OpenHarness features on a real codebase with actual LLM calls. Validate OpenHarness features by running real agent loops against an unf…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Core Principles / Workflow / 1. Prepare Workspace” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; requires Anthropic API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; requires Anthropic API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: This skill should be used when the user asks to "test the harness", "run integration tests", "validate features with real API"…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Core Principles”, “Workflow”, “1. Prepare Workspace”, “2. Configure Environment”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name harness-eval directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Core Principles / Workflow / 1. Prepare Workspace” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare Anthropic API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.