kubernetes-hardening-kubesecmanifest-detect
- Repo stars 0
- Author repo skills-registry
Scanning Kubernetes Manifests with Kubesec
Overview
Kubesec is an open-source security risk analysis tool developed by ControlPlane that inspects Kubernetes resource manifests for common exploitable risks such as privilege escalation, writable host mounts, and excessive capabilities. It assigns a numerical security score to each resource and provides actionable recommendations for hardening. Kubesec can be used as a CLI binary, Docker container, kubectl plugin, admission webhook, or REST API endpoint.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve scanning kubernetes manifests with kubesec
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Kubernetes manifest files (YAML/JSON) for Deployments, Pods, DaemonSets, StatefulSets
- Docker or Go runtime for local installation
- kubectl access for scanning live cluster resources
- CI/CD pipeline access for automated scanning integration
Core Concepts
Security Scoring System
Kubesec assigns a score to each Kubernetes resource based on security checks:
- Positive scores: Awarded for security-enhancing configurations (readOnlyRootFilesystem, runAsNonRoot)
- Zero or negative scores: Indicate missing security controls or dangerous configurations
- Critical advisories: Flagged configurations that represent immediate security risks
Check Categories
- Privilege Controls: Checks for privileged containers, host PID/network access, root execution
- Capabilities: Identifies excessive Linux capabilities (SYS_ADMIN, NET_RAW)
- Volume Mounts: Detects dangerous host path mounts and writable sensitive paths
- Resource Limits: Validates presence of CPU/memory resource constraints
- Security Context: Verifies seccomp profiles, AppArmor annotations, SELinux contexts
Installation
Binary Installation
# Linux/macOS
curl -sSL https://github.com/controlplaneio/kubesec/releases/latest/download/kubesec_linux_amd64.tar.gz | \
tar xz -C /usr/local/bin/ kubesec
# Verify installation
kubesec version
Docker Installation
docker pull kubesec/kubesec:v2
# Scan a manifest file
docker run -i kubesec/kubesec:v2 scan /dev/stdin < deployment.yaml
kubectl Plugin
kubectl krew install kubesec-scan
kubectl kubesec-scan pod mypod -n default
Practical Scanning
Scanning a Single Manifest
# Scan a deployment manifest
kubesec scan deployment.yaml
# Scan with JSON output
kubesec scan -o json deployment.yaml
# Scan from stdin
cat pod.yaml | kubesec scan -
Sample Output
[
{
"object": "Pod/web-app.default",
"valid": true,
"fileName": "pod.yaml",
"message": "Passed with a score of 3 points",
"score": 3,
"scoring": {
"passed": [
{
"id": "ReadOnlyRootFilesystem",
"selector": "containers[] .securityContext .readOnlyRootFilesystem == true",
"reason": "An immutable root filesystem prevents applications from writing to their local disk",
"points": 1
},
{
"id": "RunAsNonRoot",
"selector": "containers[] .securityContext .runAsNonRoot == true",
"reason": "Force the running image to run as a non-root user",
"points": 1
},
{
"id": "LimitsCPU",
"selector": "containers[] .resources .limits .cpu",
"reason": "Enforcing CPU limits prevents DOS via resource exhaustion",
"points": 1
}
],
"advise": [
{
"id": "ApparmorAny",
"selector": "metadata .annotations .\"container.apparmor.security.beta.kubernetes.io/nginx\"",
"reason": "Well defined AppArmor policies reduce the attack surface of the container",
"points": 3
},
{
"id": "ServiceAccountName",
"selector": ".spec .serviceAccountName",
"reason": "Service accounts restrict Kubernetes API access and should be configured",
"points": 3
}
]
}
}
]
Scanning Multiple Resources
# Scan all YAML files in a directory
for file in manifests/*.yaml; do
echo "=== Scanning $file ==="
kubesec scan "$file"
done
# Scan multi-document YAML
kubesec scan multi-resource.yaml
Using the HTTP API
# Scan via the public API
curl -sSX POST --data-binary @deployment.yaml \
https://v2.kubesec.io/scan
# Run a local API server
kubesec http --port 8080 &
# Scan against local server
curl -sSX POST --data-binary @deployment.yaml \
http://localhost:8080/scan
CI/CD Integration
GitHub Actions
name: kubernetes-hardening-kubesecmanifest
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
kubesec:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Install Kubesec
run: |
curl -sSL https://github.com/controlplaneio/kubesec/releases/latest/download/kubesec_linux_amd64.tar.gz | \
tar xz -C /usr/local/bin/ kubesec
- name: Scan Manifests
run: |
FAIL=0
for file in k8s/*.yaml; do
SCORE=$(kubesec scan "$file" | jq '.[0].score')
echo "$file: score=$SCORE"
if [ "$SCORE" -lt 0 ]; then
echo "FAIL: $file has critical issues (score: $SCORE)"
FAIL=1
fi
done
exit $FAIL
GitLab CI
kubesec-scan:
stage: security
image: kubesec/kubesec:v2
script:
- |
for file in k8s/*.yaml; do
kubesec scan "$file" > /tmp/result.json
SCORE=$(cat /tmp/result.json | jq '.[0].score')
if [ "$SCORE" -lt 0 ]; then
echo "CRITICAL: $file scored $SCORE"
cat /tmp/result.json | jq '.[0].scoring.critical'
exit 1
fi
done
artifacts:
paths:
- kubesec-results/
Admission Webhook
Deploy Kubesec as a ValidatingWebhookConfiguration to reject insecure manifests at deploy time:
apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1
kind: ValidatingWebhookConfiguration
metadata:
name: kubesec-webhook
webhooks:
- name: kubesec.controlplane.io
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
apiVersions: ["v1"]
operations: ["CREATE", "UPDATE"]
resources: ["pods"]
- apiGroups: ["apps"]
apiVersions: ["v1"]
operations: ["CREATE", "UPDATE"]
resources: ["deployments", "daemonsets", "statefulsets"]
clientConfig:
service:
name: kubesec-webhook
namespace: kube-system
path: /scan
failurePolicy: Fail
sideEffects: None
admissionReviewVersions: ["v1"]
Security Checks Reference
Critical Checks (Negative Score)
| Check | Selector | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Privileged | securityContext.privileged == true |
Full host access |
| HostPID | spec.hostPID == true |
Process namespace escape |
| HostNetwork | spec.hostNetwork == true |
Network namespace escape |
| SYS_ADMIN | capabilities.add contains SYS_ADMIN |
Near-root capability |
Best Practice Checks (Positive Score)
| Check | Points | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ReadOnlyRootFilesystem | +1 | Prevents filesystem writes |
| RunAsNonRoot | +1 | Non-root process execution |
| RunAsUser > 10000 | +1 | High UID reduces collision risk |
| LimitsCPU | +1 | Prevents CPU resource exhaustion |
| LimitsMemory | +1 | Prevents memory resource exhaustion |
| RequestsCPU | +1 | Ensures scheduler resource awareness |
| ServiceAccountName | +3 | Explicit service account |
| AppArmor annotation | +3 | Kernel-level MAC enforcement |
| Seccomp profile | +4 | Syscall filtering |
References
- Kubesec GitHub Repository
- Kubesec Online Scanner
- ControlPlane Security Tools
- CIS Kubernetes Benchmark
- Kubernetes Pod Security Standards
<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-05-22 -->Source: DCx7C5/ai-marketplace — distributed by TomeVault.
- Fluxly category
- DevOps
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @tomevault-io · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Manual integration
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- macOS · Linux · Docker
- Runtime requirements
- Docker
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Detected network behavior
- External requests
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
# Sample Output
[
{
"object": "Pod/web-app.default",
"valid": true,
"fileName": "pod.yaml",
"message": "Passed with a score of 3 points",
"score": 3,
"scoring": {
"passed": [
{
"id": "ReadOnlyRootFilesystem",
"selector": "containers[] .securityContext .readOnlyRootFilesystem == true",
"reason": "An immutable root filesystem prevents applications from writing to their local disk",
"points": 1
},
{
"id": "RunAsNonRoot",
"selector": "containers[] .securityContext .runAsNonRoot == true",
"reason": "Force the running image to run as a non-root user",
"points": 1
},
{
"id": "LimitsCPU",
"selector": "containers[] .resources .limits .cpu",
"reason": "Enforcing CPU limits prevents DOS via resource exhaustion",
"points": 1
}
],
"advise": [
{
"id": "ApparmorAny",
"selector": "metadata .annotations .\"container.apparmor.security.beta.kubernetes.io/nginx\"",
"reason": "Well defined AppArmor policies reduce the attack surface of the container",
"points": 3
},
{
"id": "ServiceAccountName",
"selector": ".spec .serviceAccountName",
"reason": "Service accounts restrict Kubernetes API access and should be configured",
"points": 3
}
]
}
}
] Kubesec is an open-source security risk analysis tool developed by ControlPlane that inspects Kubernetes resource manifests for common exploitable risks such as privilege escalation, writable host mounts, and excessive capabilities. It assigns a numerical…
When conducting security assessments that involve scanning kubernetes manifests with kubesec When following incident response procedures for related security events When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
Kubernetes manifest files (YAML/JSON) for Deployments, Pods, DaemonSets, StatefulSets Docker or Go runtime for local installation kubectl access for scanning live cluster resources
Core Concepts
Kubesec assigns a score to each Kubernetes resource based on security checks: Positive scores: Awarded for security-enhancing configurations (readOnlyRootFilesystem, runAsNonRoot) Zero or negative scores: Indicate missing security controls or dangerous…
Privilege Controls: Checks for privileged containers, host PID/network access, root execution Capabilities: Identifies excessive Linux capabilities (SYSADMIN, NETRAW) Volume Mounts: Detects dangerous host path mounts and writable sensitive paths
# Scanning Kubernetes Manifests with Kubesec
## Overview
Kubesec is an open-source security risk analysis tool developed by ControlPlane that inspects Kubernetes resource manifests for common exploitable risks such as privilege escalation, writable host mounts, and excessive capabilities. It assigns a numerical security score to each resource and provides actionable recommendations for hardening. Kubesec can be used as a CLI binary, Docker container, kubectl plugin, admission webhook, or REST API endpoint.
## When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve scanning kubernetes manifests with kubesec
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
## Prerequisites
- Kubernetes manifest files (YAML/JSON) for Deployments, Pods, DaemonSets, StatefulSets
- Docker or Go runtime for local installation
- kubectl access for scanning live cluster resources
- CI/CD pipeline access for automated scanning integration
## Core Concepts
### Security Scoring System
Kubesec assigns a score to each Kubernetes resource based on security checks:
- **Positive scores**: Awarded for security-enhancing configurations (readOnlyRootFilesystem, runAsNonRoot)
- **Zero or negative scores**: Indicate missing security controls or dangerous configurations
- **Critical advisories**: Flagged configurations that represent immediate security risks
### Check Categories
1. **Privilege Controls**: Checks for privileged containers, host PID/network access, root execution
2. **Capabilities**: Identifies excessive Linux capabilities (SYS_ADMIN, NET_RAW)
… Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> Overview → When to Use → Prerequisites → Core Concepts → Security Scoring System → Check Categories
terms -> Positive scores · Zero or negative scores · Critical advisories · Privilege Controls · Capabilities · Volume Mounts · Resource Limits · Security Context
files/cmd -> securityContext.privileged == true · spec.hostPID == true · spec.hostNetwork == true · capabilities.add contains SYSADMIN
body sha256 -> 68de4a9d5363
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review