ppt-thesis-defense
- Repo stars 23
- Author updated Live
- Author repo PPTMaker-skill
- Domain
- Other
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @Mr-Q526 · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: ppt-thesis-defense
description: 这个子 skill 用于本科、硕士或科研汇报。目标不是把论文全文压缩进 PPT,而是用 6 到 8 页把“问题、方法、数据、结论”讲清楚,让评委先理解逻辑,再看到结果。 runs entire…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---
# ppt-thesis-defense output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: 这个子 skill 用于本科、硕士或科研汇报。目标不是把论文全文压缩进 PPT,而是用 6 到 8 页把“问题、方法、数据、结论”讲清楚,让评委先理解逻辑,再看到结果。 runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “何时使用 / 默认选择 / 输入时优先补齐的信息” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “这个子 skill 用于本科、硕士或科研汇报。目标不是把论文全文压缩进 PPT,而是用 6 到 8 页把“问题、方法、数据、结论”讲清楚,让评委先理解逻辑,再看到结果。 runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “何时使用 / 默认选择 / 输入时优先补齐的信息” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “何时使用 / 默认选择 / 输入时优先补齐的信息”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: ppt-thesis-defense
description: 这个子 skill 用于本科、硕士或科研汇报。目标不是把论文全文压缩进 PPT,而是用 6 到 8 页把“问题、方法、数据、结论”讲清楚,让评委先理解逻辑,再看到结果。 runs entire…
category: other
source: Mr-Q526/PPTMaker-skill
---
# ppt-thesis-defense
## When to use
- 这个子 skill 用于本科、硕士或科研汇报。目标不是把论文全文压缩进 PPT,而是用 6 到 8 页把“问题、方法、数据、结论”讲清楚,让评委先理解逻辑,再看到结果。 用户要做毕业答辩、论文开题、中期汇报或科研汇报 听众是导师、评委…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “何时使用 / 默认选择 / 输入时优先补齐的信息” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "ppt-thesis-defense" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> 何时使用 / 默认选择 / 输入时优先补齐的信息
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} 毕业答辩 / 学术汇报
这个子 skill 用于本科、硕士或科研汇报。目标不是把论文全文压缩进 PPT,而是用 6 到 8 页把“问题、方法、数据、结论”讲清楚,让评委先理解逻辑,再看到结果。
何时使用
- 用户要做毕业答辩、论文开题、中期汇报或科研汇报
- 听众是导师、评委、实验室成员或学术同行
- 用户有研究背景、方法、结果数据、图表或结论文字
默认选择
- archetype:
thesis-defense - template:优先
business-briefing - 推荐页数:
6-8 页
输入时优先补齐的信息
- 论文题目、答辩人信息、研究问题
- 文献现状或研究缺口
- 方法设计、实验流程、变量设置
- 结果数据、图表、对比结论
- 研究贡献、不足和未来工作
固定输出结构
- 封面
- 研究背景与问题
- 文献缺口或研究定位
- 方法与实验设计
- 结果与分析
- 结论与贡献
- Q&A
组件与文案规则
- 优先使用
title-bullets、comparison、two-column、chart、table、quote - 结果页优先展示真实数据和图表,不要用装饰图代替证据
- 方法页可以用
shape或结构化要点展示流程,但不要变成大段技术散文 - 结论页只保留 2 到 4 条最重要结论
禁止事项
- 不要写得像宣传稿
- 不要过度追求酷炫视觉
- 不要在没有明确说明时编造实验结果
- 不要用“感谢聆听”替代 Q&A 提示
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review