proposal-response-writer
- Repo stars 1
- Author updated Live
- Author repo claude-skills
- Domain
- Productivity
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @00PrabalK00 · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools，默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: proposal-response-writer
description: Draft polished client or stakeholder responses to proposals, questions, or requests using source…
category: productivity
runtime: no special runtime
---
# proposal-response-writer output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Draft polished client or stakeholder responses to proposals, questions, or requests using source notes and requirements. Use when a fast but professional response is needed..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Overview / Core Workflow / Deliver” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Draft polished client or stakeholder responses to proposals, questions, or requests using source notes and requirements. Use when a fast but professional response is needed.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Overview / Core Workflow / Deliver” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. Choose the trigger
The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Provide inputs and boundaries
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Validate with a small run
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Overview / Core Workflow / Deliver”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Review before delivery
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: proposal-response-writer
description: Draft polished client or stakeholder responses to proposals, questions, or requests using source…
category: productivity
source: 00PrabalK00/claude-skills
---
# proposal-response-writer
## When to use
- Draft polished client or stakeholder responses to proposals, questions, or requests using source notes and requirement…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Overview / Core Workflow / Deliver” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. Evidence boundary and execution chain
The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "proposal-response-writer" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Overview / Core Workflow / Deliver
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
}Proposal Response Writer
Overview
Draft polished client or stakeholder responses to proposals, questions, or requests using source notes and requirements.
Core Workflow
- Gather the source material, existing conventions, templates, and destination format before drafting.
- Extract the information that matters most for the intended audience and discard low-signal noise.
- Structure the output so it matches repo, team, or domain expectations instead of starting from a blank generic outline.
- Draft the artifact, then surface any missing facts or decisions that still need human input.
Deliver
- A ready-to-edit draft in the expected structure and tone.
- The main sections, decisions, or states the artifact should include.
- Open questions or missing facts that would improve the final output.
Guardrails
- Do not invent facts, metrics, approvals, or guarantees that are not supported by the inputs.
- Prefer existing repo or team conventions over generic formatting.
- Keep the output useful and specific rather than padded.
- Do not invent metrics, policy decisions, customer commitments, or ownership that the inputs do not support.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review