skill-composer
- Repo stars 386
- Author updated Live
- Author repo vexjoy-agent
- Domain
- Other
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @notque · no license declared
- Token usage
- Moderate
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-composer
description: DAG-based multi-skill orchestration with dependency resolution. Use when a task requires 2+ skil…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---
# skill-composer output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: DAG-based multi-skill orchestration with dependency resolution. Use when a task requires 2+ skills chained together, parallel skill execution, or conditional branching between skills. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Overview / Reference Loading Table / Instructions” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “DAG-based multi-skill orchestration with dependency resolution. Use when a task requires 2+ skills chained together, parallel skill execution, or conditional branching between skills. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Overview / Reference Loading Table / Instructions” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/tmp`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Overview / Reference Loading Table / Instructions”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: skill-composer
description: DAG-based multi-skill orchestration with dependency resolution. Use when a task requires 2+ skil…
category: other
source: notque/vexjoy-agent
---
# skill-composer
## When to use
- DAG-based multi-skill orchestration with dependency resolution. Use when a task requires 2+ skills chained together, p…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Overview / Reference Loading Table / Instructions” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "skill-composer" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Overview / Reference Loading Table / Instructions
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Skill Composer
Overview
Orchestrate complex workflows by chaining multiple skills into validated execution DAGs. This skill discovers applicable skills, resolves dependencies, validates compatibility, presents execution plans, and manages skill-to-skill context passing. Use when a task requires 2+ skills chained together, parallel skill execution, or conditional branching between skills. Invoke the single skill directly when it can handle the request alone, or for simple sequential invocation that needs no dependency management.
Core principle: Minimize composition overhead. Prefer simple 2-3 skill chains. Add only skills directly needed or "nice to have" additions without explicit user request.
Reference Loading Table
| Signal | Load These Files | Why |
|---|---|---|
| tasks related to this reference | compatibility-matrix.md |
Loads detailed guidance from compatibility-matrix.md. |
| implementation patterns | composition-patterns.md |
Loads detailed guidance from composition-patterns.md. |
| example-driven tasks | examples.md |
Loads detailed guidance from examples.md. |
| implementation patterns | skill-patterns.md |
Loads detailed guidance from skill-patterns.md. |
Instructions
Phase 1: DISCOVER
Goal: Analyze the task and find applicable skills.
Step 1: Analyze the user's request
Identify:
- Primary goals (what needs to be accomplished)
- Quality requirements (testing, verification, documentation)
- Domain constraints (language, framework, standards)
- Execution constraints (sequential vs parallel, conditionals)
Step 2: Discover available skills
Before building any DAG, scan skills/*/SKILL.md for available skills:
python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/discover_skills.py ./skills
Review the discovered skills. Categorize by type (workflow, testing, quality, documentation, code-analysis, debugging) with dependency metadata.
Step 3: Select skills (Apply minimum-skills principle)
Choose only skills directly needed for the stated goals. This prevents over-composition and unnecessary failure points:
- Can a single skill handle this? If yes, invoke it directly. Invoke it directly.
- Can 2 skills handle this? Prefer that over 3+.
- Is a skill being added "for quality" or "just in case"? Remove it.
Cross-reference selections against references/compatibility-matrix.md to confirm chaining is valid before proceeding.
Gate: Task goals identified. Available skills indexed. Selected skills directly address stated goals with no extras. Proceed only when gate passes.
Phase 2: PLAN
Goal: Build a validated execution DAG.
Step 1: Build the DAG
Construct the execution DAG as a JSON structure with nodes (skills) and edges (dependencies) based on the task analysis:
python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/build_dag.py skill-index.json task-description.json
Step 2: Validate the DAG (MANDATORY before execution)
ALWAYS validate the execution graph is acyclic before moving to execution. Validation checks:
- Acyclic: No circular dependencies exist between skills
- Compatibility: Output types from each skill match input requirements of downstream skills (consult
references/compatibility-matrix.md) - Availability: All referenced skills exist in the skill index
- Ordering: Dependencies satisfy topological ordering
If validation fails, fix the issue and re-validate. Common fixes:
- Circular dependency: Remove one edge or split into two independent compositions
- Type mismatch: Choose different skill or add transformation step
- Missing skill: Check spelling, re-run discovery
- Ordering violation: Reorder phases to satisfy dependencies
Step 3: Present the execution plan (Dry run is MANDATORY)
ALWAYS show the execution plan and get user confirmation before running skills. This prevents wasting time on composition errors:
=== Execution Plan ===
Phase 1 (Sequential):
-> skill-name
Purpose: [what it does in this context]
Output: [what it produces]
Phase 2 (Parallel):
-> skill-a
Purpose: [what it does]
Input: [from Phase 1]
-> skill-b
Purpose: [what it does]
Input: [from Phase 1]
Phase 3 (Sequential):
-> skill-c
Purpose: [what it does]
Input: [from Phase 2]
Skills: N | Phases: N | Parallel phases: N
Proceed? [Y/n]
Gate: DAG is acyclic. All skills exist. Input/output types are compatible. Topological ordering is valid. User has seen the plan. Proceed only when gate passes.
Phase 3: EXECUTE
Goal: Run skills in topological order, passing context between them.
Step 1: Execute each phase
For sequential phases:
- Invoke skill with context from previous phases
- Capture output
- Verify output/input compatibility between chained skills
- Proceed to next phase
For parallel phases:
- Launch all independent skills using Task tool (execute independent skills concurrently when no shared resources or dependencies exist)
- Wait for all to complete
- Aggregate results for next phase
Step 2: Pass context between skills
ALWAYS verify output/input compatibility between chained skills before passing context:
- Capture output from completed skill
- Transform to format expected by next skill (validate using
references/compatibility-matrix.md) - Inject as context when invoking next skill
- Verify transformation succeeded
Step 3: Report progress
After each phase completes, report:
- Phase number and skills completed
- Output summary
- Overall progress (e.g., "Phase 2/3 complete")
Show command output rather than describing it. Be concise but informative.
Step 4: Handle failures during execution
ALWAYS catch skill failures and determine if remaining chain can continue. If a skill fails mid-chain:
Assess impact: Does this block downstream skills?
- Critical (blocks all downstream): Stop chain, report what completed
- Isolated (blocks one branch): Continue other branches
- Recoverable (transient failure): Retry with adjusted parameters (max 2 attempts)
Report failure context:
Skill failed: [skill-name]
Phase: N
Error: [error message]
Downstream impact: [list blocked skills]
Continuing branches: [list unaffected skills]
Recovery options:
1. Fix error and retry
2. Skip skill and continue (if non-critical)
3. Abort entire workflow
- Execute recovery: Based on user selection or automatic policy (if auto-retry enabled)
Gate: All phases executed. All skill outputs captured. Context passed successfully between all transitions. Proceed only when gate passes.
Phase 4: REPORT
Goal: Collect results and clean up.
Step 1: Generate results summary
=== Composition Results ===
Execution Summary:
Total phases: N
Skills executed: N
Duration: X minutes
Phase Results:
Phase 1: [skill-name] - [status]
Output: [summary]
Phase 2: [skill-a] - [status]
[skill-b] - [status]
Output: [summary]
Phase 3: [skill-c] - [status]
Output: [summary]
Final Output:
[Key deliverables with file paths]
Step 2: Clean up temporary files
Remove temporary files at task completion. Keep only files explicitly needed for final output:
/tmp/skill-index.json/tmp/execution-dag.json- Any intermediate output files created during composition
Gate: Results reported. Temporary files cleaned up. Composition complete.
Error Handling
Error: "Circular dependency detected"
Cause: Skills reference each other cyclically in the DAG Solution:
- Review dependency graph for cycles
- Remove or reorder the problematic dependency
- Consider splitting into independent compositions
- Re-validate DAG before proceeding
Error: "Skill output incompatible with next skill input"
Cause: Output type from one skill does not match expected input of the next Solution:
- Consult
references/compatibility-matrix.mdfor valid chains - Add an intermediate transformation skill if one exists
- Choose a different skill combination that has compatible types
- Re-validate after changes
Error: "Skill failed during execution"
Cause: A skill in the chain encountered an error Solution:
- Determine failure impact: critical (blocks downstream), isolated (one branch), or recoverable
- If isolated: continue other branches, report partial results
- If recoverable: retry with adjusted parameters (max 2 attempts)
- If critical: abort chain, report what completed, suggest recovery options
Error: "Skill not found in index"
Cause: Referenced skill does not exist or name is misspelled Solution:
- Check spelling against skill index output
- Re-run discovery script to refresh the index
- Verify the skill directory exists under skills/
- Use the suggested alternative from the discovery output if the name was close
References
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/composition-patterns.md: Proven multi-skill composition patterns with duration estimates${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/compatibility-matrix.md: Skill input/output compatibility and valid chains${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/skill-patterns.md: Common skill patterns with sequential/parallel decision trees
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review