skill-fix-it
- Repo stars 435
- Author updated Live
- Author repo nvim
- Domain
- Productivity
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @benbrastmckie · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-fix-it
description: Scan codebase for FIX:/NOTE:/TODO:/QUESTION: tags and create structured tasks with interactive s…
category: productivity
runtime: no special runtime
---
# skill-fix-it output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Scan codebase for FIX:/NOTE:/TODO:/QUESTION: tags and create structured tasks with interactive selection. Invoke for /fix-it command. Direct execution skill for scanning files, presenting findings interactively, and creating user-selected tasks. Replaces the previous delegation-based approach with synchronous execution and AskUserQuestion prompts. runs en….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Context References / Execution / Step 1: Parse Arguments” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Scan codebase for FIX:/NOTE:/TODO:/QUESTION: tags and create structured tasks with interactive selection. Invoke for /fix-it command. Direct execution skill for scanning files, presenting findings interactively, and creating user-selected tasks. Replaces the previous delegation-based approach with synchronous execution and AskUserQuestion prompts. runs en…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Context References / Execution / Step 1: Parse Arguments” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/dev`, `/research`, `/plan`, `/implement`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Context References / Execution / Step 1: Parse Arguments”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: skill-fix-it
description: Scan codebase for FIX:/NOTE:/TODO:/QUESTION: tags and create structured tasks with interactive s…
category: productivity
source: benbrastmckie/nvim
---
# skill-fix-it
## When to use
- Scan codebase for FIX:/NOTE:/TODO:/QUESTION: tags and create structured tasks with interactive selection. Invoke for /…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Context References / Execution / Step 1: Parse Arguments” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "skill-fix-it" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Context References / Execution / Step 1: Parse Arguments
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Fix-It Skill (Direct Execution)
Direct execution skill for scanning files, presenting findings interactively, and creating user-selected tasks. Replaces the previous delegation-based approach with synchronous execution and AskUserQuestion prompts.
Key behavior: Users always see tag scan results BEFORE any tasks are created. Users select which task types to create via interactive prompts.
Context References
Reference (do not load eagerly):
- Path:
@specs/TODO.md- Current task list - Path:
@specs/state.json- Machine state
Execution
Step 1: Parse Arguments
Extract paths from command input:
# Parse from command input
paths="$ARGUMENTS"
# Default to project root if no paths specified
if [ -z "$paths" ]; then
paths="."
fi
Note: The --dry-run flag is no longer supported. The interactive flow is inherently "preview first" - users always see findings before any tasks are created.
Step 2: Generate Session ID
Generate session ID for tracking:
session_id="sess_$(date +%s)_$(od -An -N3 -tx1 /dev/urandom | tr -d ' ')"
Step 3: Execute Tag Extraction
Scan for all four tag types (FIX:, NOTE:, TODO:, QUESTION:) using file-type-specific comment patterns:
| File Type | Comment Prefix | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Lua | -- |
*.lua |
| LaTeX | % |
*.tex |
| Markdown | <!-- |
*.md |
| Script | # |
*.py, *.sh, *.yaml, *.yml |
For each tag type, grep across all file types with -rn and collect matches. Parse each match into: file path, line number, tag type, tag content.
Categorize into arrays: fix_tags[], note_tags[], todo_tags[], question_tags[].
Step 4: Display Tag Summary
Present findings to user BEFORE any selection:
## Tag Scan Results
**Files Scanned**: {paths}
**Tags Found**: {total_count}
### FIX: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {content}
- ...
### NOTE: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {content}
- ...
### TODO: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {content}
- ...
### QUESTION: Tags ({count})
- `{file}:{line}` - {content}
- ...
Step 5: Handle Edge Cases
No Tags Found
If no tags found:
## No Tags Found
Scanned files in: {paths}
No FIX:, NOTE:, TODO:, or QUESTION: tags detected.
Nothing to create.
Exit gracefully without prompts.
Only Certain Tag Types
Only show task type options for tag types that exist:
- FIX: tags exist -> offer "fix-it task"
- NOTE: tags exist -> offer "fix-it task" AND "learn-it task"
- TODO: tags exist -> offer "TODO tasks"
- QUESTION: tags exist -> offer "Research tasks"
Step 6: Task Type Selection
If tags were found, prompt user to select task types:
{
"question": "Which task types should be created?",
"header": "Task Types",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{
"label": "fix-it task",
"description": "Combine {N} FIX:/NOTE: tags into single task"
},
{
"label": "learn-it task",
"description": "Update context from {N} NOTE: tags"
},
{
"label": "TODO tasks",
"description": "Create tasks for {N} TODO: items"
},
{
"label": "Research tasks",
"description": "Create research tasks for {N} QUESTION: items"
}
]
}
Important: Only include options where the tag type exists:
- Include "fix-it task" only if FIX: or NOTE: tags exist
- Include "learn-it task" only if NOTE: tags exist
- Include "TODO tasks" only if TODO: tags exist
- Include "Research tasks" only if QUESTION: tags exist
If user selects nothing, exit gracefully:
No task types selected. No tasks created.
Step 7: Individual TODO Selection
If "TODO tasks" was selected AND there are TODO: tags:
Standard Case (<=20 TODOs)
{
"question": "Select TODO items to create as tasks:",
"header": "TODO Selection",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{
"label": "{content truncated to 50 chars}",
"description": "{file}:{line}"
},
...
]
}
Large Number of TODOs (>20)
Add a "Select all" option at the top:
{
"question": "Select TODO items to create as tasks:",
"header": "TODO Selection (many items)",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{
"label": "Select all ({N} items)",
"description": "Create a task for every TODO tag"
},
{
"label": "{content truncated to 50 chars}",
"description": "{file}:{line}"
},
...
]
}
If "Select all" is chosen, include all TODOs. Otherwise, only selected items.
Step 7.5: Topic Grouping (Shared Algorithm)
This grouping algorithm applies to both TODO items (Step 7.5) and QUESTION items (Step 7.7). Skip if only 1 item selected.
Topic Indicator Extraction per item:
- Key Terms: Significant words (nouns, verbs), ignoring stop words
- File Section: Group by file path prefix
- Action Type: Inferred from content (Add/Create -> implementation, Fix -> fix, Document -> docs, Test -> testing, Refactor -> improvement). For QUESTION items, action_type is always "research".
Clustering Algorithm:
- Start with first item as initial group
- For each remaining item: add to existing group if shares 2+ key terms OR shares file_section + action_type; otherwise start new group
- Generate topic label from most common shared terms
- Single-item groups are kept as-is
Store result: topic_groups[] with {label, items[], shared_terms[], action_type}
Step 7.5.4: Topic Group Confirmation
Condition: At least one group has 2+ items (otherwise skip -- no grouping benefit).
Present via AskUserQuestion (multiSelect: false):
- "Accept suggested topic groups" -- Creates {N} grouped tasks
- "Keep as separate tasks" -- Creates {M} individual tasks
- "Create single combined task" -- Creates 1 task with all items
Store: grouping_mode = "grouped" | "separate" | "combined"
Step 7.6: Individual QUESTION Selection
Condition: User selected "Research tasks" in Step 6 AND QUESTION: tags exist.
Same pattern as Step 7 (TODO selection): AskUserQuestion with multiSelect, "Select all" option when >20 items.
Step 7.7: Topic Grouping for QUESTION Items
Condition: Selected more than 1 QUESTION item.
Apply the same algorithm as Step 7.5 with these differences:
- action_type is always "research"
- Store result in
question_topic_groups[] - Confirmation prompt uses "research tasks" wording
Store: question_grouping_mode = "grouped" | "separate" | "combined"
Step 8: Create Selected Tasks
For each selected task type, create the task. Important: When NOTE: tags exist and both fix-it and learn-it tasks are selected, create learn-it FIRST so fix-it can depend on it.
8.1: Get Next Task Number
next_num=$(jq -r '.next_project_number' specs/state.json)
8.2: Dependency-Aware Task Creation Order
Check for NOTE: dependency condition:
has_note_dependency = (NOTE: tags exist) AND (user selected both "fix-it task" AND "learn-it task")
If has_note_dependency is TRUE:
- Create learn-it task FIRST (Step 8.2a)
- Store learn-it task number as
learn_it_task_num - Create fix-it task SECOND with dependency (Step 8.2b)
If has_note_dependency is FALSE:
- Create fix-it task first (if selected)
- Create learn-it task second (if selected)
- No dependency relationship
8.2a: Learn-It Task (when created first for dependency)
Condition: has_note_dependency is TRUE
{
"title": "Update context files from NOTE: tags",
"description": "Update {N} context files based on learnings:\n\n{grouped by target context}",
"task_type": "meta",
"effort": "1-2 hours"
}
Store the task number: learn_it_task_num = next_num
Increment: next_num = next_num + 1
8.2b: Fix-It Task (with dependency when has_note_dependency)
Condition: User selected "fix-it task" AND (FIX: or NOTE: tags exist)
When has_note_dependency is TRUE:
{
"title": "Fix issues from FIX:/NOTE: tags",
"description": "Address {N} items from embedded tags:\n\n{list of items with file:line references}\n\n**Important**: When making changes, remove the FIX: and NOTE: tags from the source files. Leave TODO: tags untouched (they create separate tasks).",
"task_type": "{predominant task_type from source files}",
"effort": "2-4 hours",
"dependencies": [learn_it_task_num]
}
When has_note_dependency is FALSE:
{
"title": "Fix issues from FIX:/NOTE: tags",
"description": "Address {N} items from embedded tags:\n\n{list of items with file:line references}\n\n**Important**: When making changes, remove the FIX: and NOTE: tags from the source files. Leave TODO: tags untouched (they create separate tasks).",
"task_type": "{predominant task_type from source files}",
"effort": "2-4 hours"
}
Language Detection:
if majority of tags from .lean files -> "lean"
elif majority from .tex files -> "latex"
elif majority from .claude/ files -> "meta"
else -> "general"
8.3: Learn-It Task (when created without dependency)
Condition: User selected "learn-it task" AND NOTE: tags exist AND has_note_dependency is FALSE
{
"title": "Update context files from NOTE: tags",
"description": "Update {N} context files based on learnings:\n\n{grouped by target context}",
"task_type": "meta",
"effort": "1-2 hours"
}
8.4: Todo-Tasks (if selected)
Condition: User selected "TODO tasks" AND user selected specific TODO items
Check grouping_mode (from Step 7.5.4, defaults to "separate" if Step 7.5.4 was skipped):
8.4.1: Grouped Mode (grouping_mode == "grouped")
For each topic group in topic_groups:
{
"title": "{topic_label}: {item_count} TODO items",
"description": "Address TODO items related to {topic_label}:\n\n{item_list}\n\n---\n\nShared context: {shared_terms_description}",
"task_type": "{detected from majority file type in group}",
"effort": "{scaled_effort}"
}
Where:
{topic_label}= generated label (e.g., "Database Migrations"){item_count}= number of items in group{item_list}= formatted list of items:- [ ] {content} (`{file}:{line}`) - [ ] {content} (`{file}:{line}`){shared_terms_description}= brief description of why items are grouped (e.g., "Related to database schema changes")
Effort Scaling Formula:
base_effort = 1 hour
scaled_effort = base_effort + (30 min * (item_count - 1))
Examples:
1 item → 1 hour
2 items → 1.5 hours (1h + 30min)
3 items → 2 hours (1h + 60min)
4 items → 2.5 hours (1h + 90min)
8.4.2: Combined Mode (grouping_mode == "combined")
Create single task containing all selected TODO items:
{
"title": "Address {item_count} TODO items",
"description": "Combined TODO items from scan:\n\n{all_items_list}\n\n---\n\nFiles: {unique_files_list}",
"task_type": "{detected from majority file type}",
"effort": "{scaled_effort}"
}
Where:
{item_count}= total number of selected TODO items{all_items_list}= formatted list of all items with checkboxes{unique_files_list}= comma-separated list of unique files involved
Effort Scaling: Same formula as grouped mode.
8.4.3: Separate Mode (grouping_mode == "separate" or default)
For each selected TODO item individually:
{
"title": "{tag content, truncated to 60 chars}",
"description": "{full tag content}\n\nSource: {file}:{line}",
"task_type": "{detected from file type}",
"effort": "1 hour"
}
Language Detection for Todo-Task (all modes):
.lua -> "general"
.tex -> "latex"
.md -> "markdown"
.py/.sh -> "general"
.claude/* -> "meta"
8.5: Research-Tasks (if selected)
Condition: User selected "Research tasks" AND user selected specific QUESTION items.
Uses question_grouping_mode from Step 7.7 (defaults to "separate"). Same grouped/combined/separate modes as TODO tasks (Step 8.4), with these differences:
- Language detection is content-based (not file-based): Match question text against keyword lists:
- latex: theorem, proof, lemma, axiom, logic, formula, derivation, proposition, corollary, latex, tex
- meta: .claude, command, agent, skill, workflow, state.json, TODO.md, specs/
- Default: "general"
- Effort base: 1.5 hours (vs 1 hour for TODO tasks), same +30min scaling per additional item
- Title prefix: "Research: {content}" for separate mode
- Description format: Uses blockquote syntax (
> {question text}) instead of checkboxes
Step 9: Update State Files
For each task created:
9.1: Update state.json
Read current state, add new task entry, increment next_project_number:
# Create slug from title
slug=$(echo "$title" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | tr ' ' '_' | tr -cd 'a-z0-9_' | cut -c1-50)
# Read current state
current=$(cat specs/state.json)
# Add task using jq (use two-step pattern to avoid escaping issues)
# Step 1: Write task data to temp file
# Step 2: Use jq with slurpfile
For fix-it task when has_note_dependency is TRUE, include dependencies array:
{
"project_number": {N},
"project_name": "{slug}",
"status": "not_started",
"task_type": "{task_type}",
"dependencies": [learn_it_task_num]
}
For all other tasks, no dependencies field needed.
9.2: Update TODO.md
Prepend new task entry to ## Tasks section (new tasks at top):
Standard format (no dependency):
### {N}. {Title}
- **Effort**: {estimate}
- **Status**: [NOT STARTED]
- **Task Type**: {task_type}
- **Started**: {timestamp}
**Description**: {description}
---
Fix-it task format when has_note_dependency is TRUE:
### {N}. {Title}
- **Effort**: {estimate}
- **Status**: [NOT STARTED]
- **Task Type**: {task_type}
- **Dependencies**: {learn_it_task_num}
- **Started**: {timestamp}
**Description**: {description}
---
Step 10: Display Results
Show summary of created tasks:
## Tasks Created from Tags
**Tags Processed**: {N} across scanned files
### Created Tasks
| # | Type | Title | Language |
|---|------|-------|----------|
| {N} | fix-it | Fix issues from FIX:/NOTE: tags | {lang} |
| {N+1} | learn-it | Update context files from NOTE: tags | meta |
| {N+2} | todo | {title} | {lang} |
| {N+3} | research | Research: {question title} | {lang} |
---
**Next Steps**:
1. Review tasks in TODO.md
2. Run `/research {first_task}` to begin
3. Progress through /research -> /plan -> /implement cycle
Step 11: Git Commit (Postflight)
If tasks were created, commit changes:
task_count={number of tasks created}
git add specs/TODO.md specs/state.json
git commit -m "fix-it: create $task_count tasks from tags
Session: $session_id
Error Handling
See rules/error-handling.md for general patterns. Skill-specific behaviors:
- Path access errors: Log warning per invalid path, continue with valid ones; exit if none remain
- No tags found: Not an error -- report informatively and exit without prompts
- state.json/TODO.md failures: Try two-step jq pattern; report partial success if still failing
- Git commit failure: Non-blocking (tasks still created)
Standards Reference
Implements the multi-task creation pattern (full compliance). See .claude/docs/reference/standards/multi-task-creation-standard.md.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review