Output preview skill-from-masters.preview

---
name: skill-from-masters
description: 创建像实战专家一样的skill，而不是像书呆子一样的skill。 |----------|----------| | 做得最好的人 | 写书的人 | | 销售冠军 | 销售方法论作者 | |…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---

# skill-from-masters output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: 创建像实战专家一样的skill，而不是像书呆子一样的skill。 |----------|----------| | 做得最好的人 | 写书的人 | | 销售冠军 | 销售方法论作者 | | 让客户感动的客服 | 客服培训师 | runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “核心理念 / 实践专家 vs 理论专家 / 工作流程” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “创建像实战专家一样的skill，而不是像书呆子一样的skill。 |----------|----------| | 做得最好的人 | 写书的人 | | 销售冠军 | 销售方法论作者 | | 让客户感动的客服 | 客服培训师 | runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “核心理念 / 实践专家 vs 理论专家 / 工作流程” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.

Choose the trigger

The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.

Provide inputs and boundaries

Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.

Validate with a small run

Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “核心理念 / 实践专家 vs 理论专家 / 工作流程”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.

Review before delivery

Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.

SKILL.md SKILL.md

---
name: skill-from-masters
description: 创建像实战专家一样的skill，而不是像书呆子一样的skill。 |----------|----------| | 做得最好的人 | 写书的人 | | 销售冠军 | 销售方法论作者 | |…
category: other
source: GBSOSS/skill-from-masters
---

# skill-from-masters

## When to use
- Skill From Masters 创建像实战专家一样的skill，而不是像书呆子一样的skill。 Skill是干活的。干活的知识来自实践，不是来自理论。 | 实践专家 | 理论专家 | |----------|----------…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.

## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.

## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “核心理念 / 实践专家 vs 理论专家 / 工作流程” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.

## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies.

Evidence boundary and execution chain

The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.

skill "skill-from-masters" {
  input      -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
  context    -> 核心理念 / 实践专家 vs 理论专家 / 工作流程
  rules      -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
  runtime    -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
  guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
  output     -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
}

skill-from-masters

Decide Fit First

Design Intent

How To Use It

Boundaries And Review

Skill From Masters

核心理念

实践专家 vs 理论专家

工作流程

Step 1: 理解和收窄任务

Step 2: 找案例（最重要的步骤）⚠️

2.1 找黄金案例（做得最好的人怎么做的）

2.2 找失败案例（什么是做得差的）⚠️ 同样重要

2.3 找对比（有效 vs 无效）

Step 3: 归纳有效/无效模式

Step 4: 用理论辅助解释（可选）

Step 5: 生成Skill

Step 6: 用案例测试

搜索策略对比

❌ 旧的（偏理论）

✅ 新的（偏实践）

质量检查清单

示例：员工关怀Skill的正确做法

❌ 错误做法（旧流程）

✅ 正确做法（新流程）

核心记住

Discussion

实践专家	理论专家
做得最好的人	写书的人
销售冠军	销售方法论作者
让客户感动的客服	客服培训师
招到好人的面试官	面试技巧书作者
让人想继续倾诉的倾听者	心理咨询教授