skill-governance-loop
- Repo stars 288
- Author repo ai-collab-playbook
Skill Governance Loop
Overview
Use this skill for evidence-based governance of one skill or a small target set. It starts from a concrete problem, audits the skill, and ends with an explicit keep, disable, merge, split, or archive decision.
Rules
- Start from a concrete case such as poor triggering, overlap, bloat, or a version update request.
- Produce three outputs every time: the case, the audit, and the decision.
- Separate static quality from observed usefulness; a pretty skill is not automatically a useful skill.
- Use inventory tooling first when the scope is broad enough to need filesystem evidence.
- Record the next hypothesis so the next governance pass has a sharper starting point.
When to Use
Use when:
- the user asks to review a skill, analyze skill quality, or update a skill version
- a skill may need to be kept, disabled, merged, split, archived, or moved
- the user wants a repeatable governance loop instead of one-off edits
Do not use when:
- the task is broad inventory scanning of many skills at once
- the work is simple skill authoring with no governance decision
- the request is only to discover whether a skill exists
- Fluxly category
- Engineering
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @cnfjlhj · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- Unspecified
- Runtime requirements
- Unspecified
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Detected network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. Use this skill for evidence-based governance of one skill or a small target set. It starts from a concrete problem, audits the skill, and ends with an explicit keep, disable, merge, split, or archive decision.
Start from a concrete case such as poor triggering, overlap, bloat, or a version update request. Produce three outputs every time: the case, the audit, and the decision. Separate static quality from observed usefulness; a pretty skill is not automatically a…
Use when: the user asks to review a skill, analyze skill quality, or update a skill version a skill may need to be kept, disabled, merged, split, archived, or moved
# Skill Governance Loop
## Overview
Use this skill for evidence-based governance of one skill or a small target set. It starts from a concrete problem, audits the skill, and ends with an explicit keep, disable, merge, split, or archive decision.
## Rules
- Start from a concrete case such as poor triggering, overlap, bloat, or a version update request.
- Produce three outputs every time: the case, the audit, and the decision.
- Separate static quality from observed usefulness; a pretty skill is not automatically a useful skill.
- Use inventory tooling first when the scope is broad enough to need filesystem evidence.
- Record the next hypothesis so the next governance pass has a sharper starting point.
## When to Use
Use when:
- the user asks to review a skill, analyze skill quality, or update a skill version
- a skill may need to be kept, disabled, merged, split, archived, or moved
- the user wants a repeatable governance loop instead of one-off edits
Do not use when:
- the task is broad inventory scanning of many skills at once
- the work is simple skill authoring with no governance decision
- the request is only to discover whether a skill exists Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> Overview → Rules → When to Use
terms -> Use this skill for evidence-based governance of one skill or a small target set. · - Start from a concrete case such as poor triggering, overlap, bloat, or a version update request.
files/cmd -> no explicit files or commands
body sha256 -> e74868309ecf
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review