skill-lean-implementation
- Repo stars 435
- Author updated Live
- Author repo nvim
- Domain
- Engineering
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @benbrastmckie · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-lean-implementation
description: Implement Lean 4 proofs and definitions using lean-lsp tools. Invoke for Lean-language implement…
category: engineering
runtime: no special runtime
---
# skill-lean-implementation output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Implement Lean 4 proofs and definitions using lean-lsp tools. Invoke for Lean-language implementation tasks. Thin wrapper that delegates Lean 4 proof implementation to lean-implementation-agent subagent. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow / Stage 1: Input Validation” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Implement Lean 4 proofs and definitions using lean-lsp tools. Invoke for Lean-language implementation tasks. Thin wrapper that delegates Lean 4 proof implementation to lean-implementation-agent subagent. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow / Stage 1: Input Validation” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/implement`, `/team-implement`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow / Stage 1: Input Validation”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: skill-lean-implementation
description: Implement Lean 4 proofs and definitions using lean-lsp tools. Invoke for Lean-language implement…
category: engineering
source: benbrastmckie/nvim
---
# skill-lean-implementation
## When to use
- Implement Lean 4 proofs and definitions using lean-lsp tools. Invoke for Lean-language implementation tasks. Thin wrap…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow / Stage 1: Input Validation” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "skill-lean-implementation" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow / Stage 1: Input Validation
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Lean Implementation Skill
Thin wrapper that delegates Lean 4 proof implementation to lean-implementation-agent subagent.
IMPORTANT: This skill implements the skill-internal postflight pattern. After the subagent returns, this skill handles all postflight operations (status update, artifact linking, git commit) before returning.
Trigger Conditions
This skill activates when:
- Task type is "lean4" or "lean" (either accepted)
- /implement command targets a Lean task
- Plan exists and task is ready for implementation
Execution Flow
Stage 1: Input Validation
Validate required inputs:
task_number- Must be provided and exist in state.json- Task status must allow implementation (planned, implementing, partial)
- Task type must be "lean" or "lean4"
# Lookup task
task_data=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)' \
specs/state.json)
# Validate exists
if [ -z "$task_data" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number not found"
fi
# Extract fields
task_type=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.task_type // "general"')
status=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.status')
project_name=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.project_name')
# Validate task_type (accept both "lean" and "lean4")
if [ "$task_type" != "lean" ] && [ "$task_type" != "lean4" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number is not a Lean task (task_type: $task_type)"
fi
Task Complexity Warning (GATE IN)
After identifying the plan file, extract the estimated effort and warn if total exceeds 20 hours:
plan_file="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/plans/$(ls specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/plans/ 2>/dev/null | tail -1)"
if [ -f "$plan_file" ]; then
effort_line=$(grep -i "Effort\|estimate\|hours\?" "$plan_file" 2>/dev/null | head -5)
effort_hours=$(echo "$effort_line" | grep -oP '\d+(?=\s*h(our)?s?)' | head -1)
if [ -n "$effort_hours" ] && [ "$effort_hours" -gt 20 ] 2>/dev/null; then
echo "WARNING: Task complexity exceeds 20 hours estimated effort (${effort_hours}h)."
echo " Consider using /team-implement or breaking into smaller phases."
echo " Proceeding with single-agent implementation."
fi
fi
This warning is non-blocking. If effort hours cannot be parsed, no warning is emitted.
Stage 2: Preflight Status Update
Update task status to "implementing" BEFORE invoking subagent.
Update state.json:
jq --arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
--arg status "implementing" \
--arg sid "$session_id" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')) |= . + {
status: $status,
last_updated: $ts,
session_id: $sid,
started: $ts
}' specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
Update TODO.md: Use Edit tool to change status marker from [PLANNED] to [IMPLEMENTING].
Stage 3: Prepare Delegation Context
Prepare delegation context for the subagent:
{
"session_id": "sess_{timestamp}_{random}",
"delegation_depth": 1,
"delegation_path": ["orchestrator", "implement", "skill-lean-implementation"],
"timeout": 7200,
"task_context": {
"task_number": N,
"task_name": "{project_name}",
"description": "{description}",
"task_type": "${task_type}"
},
"plan_path": "specs/{N}_{SLUG}/plans/implementation-{NNN}.md",
"metadata_file_path": "specs/{N}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json"
}
Stage 4: Invoke Subagent
CRITICAL: You MUST use the Task tool to spawn the subagent.
Required Tool Invocation:
Tool: Task (NOT Skill)
Parameters:
- subagent_type: "lean-implementation-agent"
- prompt: [Include task_context, delegation_context, plan_path, metadata_file_path]
- description: "Execute Lean implementation for task {N}"
DO NOT use Skill(lean-implementation-agent) - this will FAIL.
The subagent will:
- Load implementation context files (MCP tools guide, tactic patterns)
- Parse plan and find resume point
- Execute phases sequentially using lean-lsp MCP tools
- Verify proofs with
lean_goalandlake build - Create implementation summary
- Write metadata to
specs/{N}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json - Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON)
Stage 5: Parse Subagent Return (Read Metadata File)
After subagent returns, read the metadata file:
metadata_file="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.return-meta.json"
if [ -f "$metadata_file" ] && jq empty "$metadata_file" 2>/dev/null; then
status=$(jq -r '.status' "$metadata_file")
artifact_path=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].path // ""' "$metadata_file")
phases_completed=$(jq -r '.metadata.phases_completed // 0' "$metadata_file")
phases_total=$(jq -r '.metadata.phases_total // 0' "$metadata_file")
else
echo "Error: Invalid or missing metadata file"
status="failed"
fi
Stage 6: Zero-Debt Verification Gate (MANDATORY)
CRITICAL: Before proceeding to status update, verify the zero-debt completion gate.
If status from metadata is "implemented":
# Check for sorries in modified files
sorry_count=$(grep -r "\bsorry\b" Theories/ 2>/dev/null | grep -v "^[[:space:]]*--" | wc -l)
# Check for vacuous definitions (semantically equivalent to sorry)
vacuous_count=$(grep -rn "^\s*\(noncomputable \)\?\(def\|theorem\|lemma\|instance\).*:= \(True\|Unit\|trivial\|Trivial\)\s*$" Theories/ 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
if [ "$vacuous_count" -gt 0 ]; then
echo " vacuous_count=$vacuous_count (def/theorem/lemma/instance := True|Unit|trivial|Trivial)"
fi
# Verify build passes
if ! lake build 2>/dev/null; then
build_failed=true
fi
if [ "$sorry_count" -gt 0 ] || [ "$vacuous_count" -gt 0 ] || [ "$build_failed" = true ]; then
echo "Zero-debt gate FAILED"
status="partial"
fi
Stage 6b: Plan Compliance Spot-Check (MANDATORY)
After the Zero-Debt gate passes, verify that plan-declared deliverables exist and that no replacement function delegates to the function it purports to replace.
This stage only runs if status from metadata is "implemented". If the agent returned "partial" or "failed", skip Stage 6b and proceed to Stage 7.
Step 1: Extract plan goal names
# plan_file is available from Stage 1 (GATE IN complexity warning)
if [ ! -f "$plan_file" ]; then
echo "WARNING: Plan file not found — skipping compliance check"
compliance_check="skipped"
else
# Extract backtick-wrapped identifiers from **Goals**: section
goal_names=$(sed -n '/^\*\*Goals\*\*:/,/^\*\*[^G]/p' "$plan_file" \
| grep -oP '`[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_'"'"']*`' \
| tr -d '`' | sort -u)
if [ -z "$goal_names" ]; then
echo "INFO: No goal names found in plan **Goals**: section — skipping compliance check"
compliance_check="skipped"
else
compliance_failed=false
# Step 2: Deliverable existence check
for name in $goal_names; do
if grep -rq "^\(noncomputable \)\?\(theorem\|def\|lemma\|instance\) $name\b" Theories/ 2>/dev/null; then
echo " [OK] $name — found in Theories/"
else
echo " [MISSING] $name — not found in Theories/ (plan deliverable absent)"
compliance_failed=true
fi
done
# Step 3: Delivery integrity check
replacement_targets=$(grep -oP '(?:replacement for|replaces|bypasses|supersedes)\s+`[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_'"'"']*`' "$plan_file" 2>/dev/null \
| grep -oP '`[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_'"'"']*`' | tr -d '`')
for replaced in $replacement_targets; do
for new_name in $goal_names; do
new_file=$(grep -rl "^\(noncomputable \)\?\(theorem\|def\|lemma\|instance\) $new_name\b" Theories/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)
if [ -n "$new_file" ] && grep -q "\b${replaced}\b" "$new_file"; then
echo " [INTEGRITY FAIL] $new_name references $replaced in $new_file"
echo " Plan declared $new_name as replacement for $replaced, but implementation delegates to it."
compliance_failed=true
fi
done
done
if [ "$compliance_failed" = true ]; then
echo "Plan compliance spot-check FAILED"
compliance_check="failed"
status="partial"
else
echo "Plan compliance spot-check PASSED"
compliance_check="passed"
fi
fi
fi
Step 4: Record compliance result in metadata
The compliance_check value ("passed", "failed", or "skipped") must be included in the .return-meta.json update passed to the GATE OUT stage. Update the metadata read logic to propagate this field.
Stage 7: Update Task Status (Postflight)
If status is "implemented" (verified by Stage 6):
Update state.json to "completed":
jq --arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" \
--arg status "completed" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')) |= . + {
status: $status,
last_updated: $ts,
completed: $ts
}' specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
Update TODO.md: Change status marker from [IMPLEMENTING] to [COMPLETED].
If status is "partial":
Keep status as "implementing" but update resume point.
TODO.md stays as [IMPLEMENTING].
Stage 8: Link Artifacts
Add summary artifact to state.json.
if [ -n "$summary_artifact_path" ]; then
jq --arg path "$summary_artifact_path" \
--arg summary "$summary_artifact_summary" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == '$task_number')).artifacts += [{"path": $path, "type": "summary", "summary": $summary}]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Stage 9: Git Commit
Commit changes with session ID. If the subagent already created per-phase commits (Phase Checkpoint Protocol), skip the batch commit to avoid redundant history:
# Check if per-phase commits already exist from subagent Phase Checkpoint Protocol
if git log --oneline -10 | grep -q "phase [0-9]\+:"; then
echo "Per-phase commits detected — skipping batch commit."
echo "Phase commits already capture implementation history."
else
# No per-phase commits found — create a batch commit
git add \
"Theories/" \
"specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/summaries/" \
"specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/plans/" \
"specs/TODO.md" \
"specs/state.json"
git commit -m "task ${task_number}: complete implementation
Session: ${session_id}
"
fi
# Always commit state updates if not already staged
git add "specs/TODO.md" "specs/state.json" 2>/dev/null || true
git diff --cached --quiet || git commit -m "task ${task_number}: update task state
Session: ${session_id}
"
Stage 10: Return Brief Summary
Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON). Example:
Lean implementation completed for task {N}:
- All {phases_total} phases executed, all proofs verified
- Lake build: Success
- Key theorems: {theorem names}
- Created summary at specs/{N}_{SLUG}/summaries/implementation-summary-{DATE}.md
- Status updated to [COMPLETED]
- Changes committed
Error Handling
Input Validation Errors
Return immediately with error message if task not found, wrong language, or status invalid.
Metadata File Missing
If subagent didn't write metadata file:
- Keep status as "implementing"
- Report error to user
Git Commit Failure
Non-blocking: Log failure but continue with success response.
Subagent Timeout
Return partial status if subagent times out (default 7200s). Keep status as "implementing" for resume.
Return Format
This skill returns a brief text summary (NOT JSON). The JSON metadata is written to the file and processed internally.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review