strategy-compare
- Repo stars 142
- Author updated Live
- Author repo vectorbt-backtesting-skills
- Domain
- Data
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @marketcalls · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- External requests
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: strategy-compare
description: Compare multiple strategies or directions (long vs short vs both) on the same symbol. Generates…
category: data
runtime: no special runtime
---
# strategy-compare output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Compare multiple strategies or directions (long vs short vs both) on the same symbol. Generates side-by-side stats table. Create a strategy comparison script. Parse $ARGUMENTS as: symbol followed by strategy names makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Arguments / Instructions / Example Usage” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Compare multiple strategies or directions (long vs short vs both) on the same symbol. Generates side-by-side stats table. Create a strategy comparison script. Parse $ARGUMENTS as: symbol followed by strategy names makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Arguments / Instructions / Example Usage” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/strategy-compare`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Arguments / Instructions / Example Usage”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: strategy-compare
description: Compare multiple strategies or directions (long vs short vs both) on the same symbol. Generates…
category: data
source: marketcalls/vectorbt-backtesting-skills
---
# strategy-compare
## When to use
- Compare multiple strategies or directions (long vs short vs both) on the same symbol. Generates side-by-side stats tab…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Arguments / Instructions / Example Usage” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "strategy-compare" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Arguments / Instructions / Example Usage
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | may access external network resources
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Create a strategy comparison script.
Arguments
Parse $ARGUMENTS as: symbol followed by strategy names
$0= symbol (e.g., SBIN, RELIANCE, NIFTY)- Remaining args = strategies to compare (e.g., ema-crossover rsi donchian)
If only a symbol is given with no strategies, compare: ema-crossover, rsi, donchian, supertrend. If "long-vs-short" is one of the strategies, compare longonly vs shortonly vs both for the first real strategy.
Instructions
- Read the vectorbt-expert skill rules for reference patterns
- Create
backtesting/strategy_comparison/directory if it doesn't exist (on-demand) - Create a
.pyfile inbacktesting/strategy_comparison/named{symbol}_strategy_comparison.py - The script must:
- Fetch data once via OpenAlgo
- If user provides a DuckDB path, load data directly via
duckdb.connect(path, read_only=True). See vectorbt-expertrules/duckdb-data.md. - If
openalgo.tais not importable (standalone DuckDB), use inlineexrem()fallback. - Use TA-Lib for ALL indicators (never VectorBT built-in)
- Use OpenAlgo ta for specialty indicators (Supertrend, Donchian, etc.)
- Clean signals with
ta.exrem()(always.fillna(False)before exrem) - Run each strategy on the same data
- Indian delivery fees:
fees=0.00111, fixed_fees=20for delivery equity - Collect key metrics from each into a side-by-side DataFrame
- Include NIFTY benchmark in the comparison table (via OpenAlgo
NSE_INDEX) - Print Strategy vs Benchmark comparison table: Total Return, Sharpe, Sortino, Max DD, Win Rate, Trades, Profit Factor
- Explain results in plain language - which strategy performed best and why
- Plot overlaid equity curves for all strategies using Plotly (
template="plotly_dark") - Save comparison to CSV
- Never use icons/emojis in code or logger output
Example Usage
/strategy-compare RELIANCE ema-crossover rsi donchian
/strategy-compare SBIN long-vs-short ema-crossover
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review