verify
- Repo stars 245,422
- Author updated Live
- Author repo react
- Domain
- Engineering
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @facebook · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: verify
description: Use when you want to validate changes before committing, or when you need to check all React con…
category: engineering
runtime: no special runtime
---
# verify output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Use when you want to validate changes before committing, or when you need to check all React contribution requirements. Run all verification steps. Run these first in sequence: runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Instructions” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Use when you want to validate changes before committing, or when you need to check all React contribution requirements. Run all verification steps. Run these first in sequence: runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Instructions” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/flow`, `/test`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Instructions”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: verify
description: Use when you want to validate changes before committing, or when you need to check all React con…
category: engineering
source: facebook/react
---
# verify
## When to use
- Use when you want to validate changes before committing, or when you need to check all React contribution requirements…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Instructions” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "verify" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Instructions
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Verification
Run all verification steps.
Arguments:
- $ARGUMENTS: Test pattern for the test step
Instructions
Run these first in sequence:
- Run
yarn prettier- format code (stop if fails) - Run
yarn linc- lint changed files (stop if fails)
Then run these with subagents in parallel:
- Use
/flowto type check (stop if fails) - Use
/testto test changes in source (stop if fails) - Use
/test wwwto test changes in www (stop if fails)
If all pass, show success summary. On failure, stop immediately and report the issue with suggested fixes.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review