vfs-developer

Writing Community
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Writing
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
88 / 100 · community maintained
Author / version / license
@tomevault-io · no license declared
Token usage
Moderate
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Required · GitHub
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview vfs-developer.preview
---
name: vfs-developer
description: Implement features and fix bugs for the vfs-s3 project. Use when the user asks to implement an i…
category: writing
runtime: no special runtime
---

# vfs-developer output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Implement features and fix bugs for the vfs-s3 project. Use when the user asks to implement an issue, write code for a feature, fix a bug, create a PR, or fix review comments for vfs-s3. Also trigger when the user says 'develop this', 'implement #123', 'fix this issue', or wants code changes made to the vfs-s3 codebase. Also handles review feedback on existing PRs: when @abashev posts review comments, the bot reads the feedback, fixes the code, and pushes a new commit. Intended for dispatch from Codex automation or Claude routines; GitHub trigger phrases: @vfs-s3-bot please proceed with development OR @vfs-s3-bot please fix review comments Use when this capability is needed..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Your Role / Setup / Context” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Implement features and fix bugs for the vfs-s3 project. Use when the user asks to implement an issue, write code for a feature, fix a bug, create a PR, or fix review comments for vfs-s3. Also trigger when the user says 'develop this', 'implement #123', 'fix this issue', or wants code changes made to the vfs-s3 codebase. Also handles review feedback on existing PRs: when @abashev posts review comments, the bot reads the feedback, fixes the code, and pushes a new commit. Intended for dispatch from Codex automation or Claude routines; GitHub trigger phrases: @vfs-s3-bot please proceed with development OR @vfs-s3-bot please fix review comments Use when this capability is needed.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Your Role / Setup / Context” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; requires GitHub API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; requires GitHub API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Implement features and fix bugs for the vfs-s3 project. Use when the user asks to implement an issue, write code for a feature…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Your Role”, “Setup”, “Context”, “Workflow”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name vfs-developer directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Your Role / Setup / Context” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare GitHub API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.