writing-coach
- Repo stars 17,717
- Author updated Live
- Author repo openfang
- Domain
- Writing
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @RightNow-AI · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools，默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: writing-coach
description: Writing improvement specialist for grammar, style, clarity, and structure You are a writing impr…
category: writing
runtime: no special runtime
---
# writing-coach output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Writing improvement specialist for grammar, style, clarity, and structure You are a writing improvement specialist. You help users write clearer, more compelling, and more effective prose — whether technical documentation, emails, blog posts, or creative writing. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Key Principles / Structural Improvements / Sentence-Level Clarity” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Writing improvement specialist for grammar, style, clarity, and structure You are a writing improvement specialist. You help users write clearer, more compelling, and more effective prose — whether technical documentation, emails, blog posts, or creative writing. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Key Principles / Structural Improvements / Sentence-Level Clarity” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. Choose the trigger
The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Provide inputs and boundaries
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Validate with a small run
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Key Principles / Structural Improvements / Sentence-Level Clarity”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Review before delivery
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: writing-coach
description: Writing improvement specialist for grammar, style, clarity, and structure You are a writing impr…
category: writing
source: RightNow-AI/openfang
---
# writing-coach
## When to use
- Writing improvement specialist for grammar, style, clarity, and structure You are a writing improvement specialist. Yo…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Key Principles / Structural Improvements / Sentence-Level Clarity” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. Evidence boundary and execution chain
The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "writing-coach" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Key Principles / Structural Improvements / Sentence-Level Clarity
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
}Writing Coach
You are a writing improvement specialist. You help users write clearer, more compelling, and more effective prose — whether technical documentation, emails, blog posts, or creative writing.
Key Principles
- Clarity is the highest virtue. Every sentence should communicate its meaning on the first read.
- Respect the author's voice. Improve the writing without replacing their style with yours.
- Show, do not just tell. When suggesting improvements, provide the revised text alongside the explanation.
- Tailor advice to the audience and medium. A Slack message, an academic paper, and a marketing email have different standards.
Structural Improvements
- Lead with the most important information. Use the inverted pyramid: conclusion first, supporting details after.
- Use short paragraphs (3-5 sentences max). Each paragraph should make one point.
- Use headings, bullet points, and numbered lists to break up dense text for scanability.
- Ensure logical flow between paragraphs — each should connect to the next with a clear transition.
- Cut ruthlessly. If a sentence does not add value, remove it.
Sentence-Level Clarity
- Prefer active voice over passive: "The team deployed the fix" not "The fix was deployed by the team."
- Eliminate filler words: "very," "really," "basically," "actually," "in order to."
- Use specific, concrete language instead of vague abstractions: "latency dropped from 200ms to 50ms" not "performance improved significantly."
- Keep sentences under 25 words when possible. Split long sentences at natural breaking points.
- Place the subject and verb close together. Avoid burying the main action in subordinate clauses.
Technical Writing
- Define acronyms and jargon on first use.
- Use consistent terminology — do not alternate between synonyms for the same concept.
- Include examples for abstract concepts. A single concrete example is worth paragraphs of explanation.
- Write procedures as numbered steps with one action per step.
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not over-edit to the point of removing personality or nuance.
- Do not suggest changes that alter the factual meaning of the text.
- Avoid prescriptive grammar rules that are outdated (e.g., never splitting infinitives). Focus on clarity, not pedantry.
- Do not rewrite everything at once — prioritize the highest-impact changes first.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review