acpx-review
- Repo stars 0
- Author updated Live
- Author repo skills-registry
- Domain
- Engineering
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @tomevault-io · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Shell exec
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: acpx-review
description: Use before DaoFlow commits when running self-review through acpx with Gemini and Claude Code, tr…
category: engineering
runtime: no special runtime
---
# acpx-review output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Use before DaoFlow commits when running self-review through acpx with Gemini and Claude Code, triaging blocking findings, and revalidating fixes. Use when this capability is needed..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Preconditions / Commands / Review Contract” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Use before DaoFlow commits when running self-review through acpx with Gemini and Claude Code, triaging blocking findings, and revalidating fixes. Use when this capability is needed.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Preconditions / Commands / Review Contract” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Preconditions / Commands / Review Contract”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: acpx-review
description: Use before DaoFlow commits when running self-review through acpx with Gemini and Claude Code, tr…
category: engineering
source: tomevault-io/skills-registry
---
# acpx-review
## When to use
- Use before DaoFlow commits when running self-review through acpx with Gemini and Claude Code, triaging blocking findin…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Preconditions / Commands / Review Contract” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, run shell commands, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "acpx-review" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Preconditions / Commands / Review Contract
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, run shell commands, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} ACPX Review
Use this skill before every significant DaoFlow commit.
Preconditions
- Local validation is already green or close to green.
acpxis available globally, or usebunx acpx.- Review the current change set unless you intentionally need a specific commit range.
Commands
Run:
acpx --approve-reads --timeout 480 gemini exec "Review the current DaoFlow change set for correctness, security, and best practices. Run git status --short, git diff --stat, git diff --cached --stat, git diff, and git diff --cached to inspect changes."
acpx --approve-reads --timeout 480 claude exec "Review the current DaoFlow change set for correctness and security. Run git status --short, git diff --stat, git diff --cached --stat, git diff, and git diff --cached to inspect changes."
If acpx is not available globally, replace it with bunx acpx.
Review Contract
- Treat correctness, security, safety, auth, and data-loss regressions as blocking.
- Fix blocking findings before commit.
- Re-run relevant validation after substantive fixes.
- Keep a short note of the findings you fixed or explicitly rejected.
- When you need a file-specific review, adapt the prompt to the exact files or diff under discussion.
Reference
Use .agents/workflows/acpx-review.md for command variants and flag details.
Source: DaoFlow-dev/DaoFlow — distributed by TomeVault.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review