add-airline

Data Community
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Orchestrate the full add-a-program workflow on the crazy4points project (works for airlines, hotels, alliances, and credit cards…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Purpose”, “Workflow — surface one step at a time”, “Step 1 — Research the program (automated via research-program.mjs)”, “Step 2 — Draft hedged content + emit Copilot fact-check block (Claude does this)”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name add-airline directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Purpose / Workflow — surface one step at a time / Step 1 — Research the program (automated via research-program.mjs)” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.
Fluxly profile Author and license come from source; runtime, permissions, and network are Fluxly detections or estimates
Fluxly category
Data
Author-declared agents
No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
Static check
88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
Author / version / license
@jillyz250 · no license declared
Fluxly token estimate
Heavy
Fluxly setup estimate
Guided setup
External API key
No requirement detected
Detected OS requirements
macOS · Linux · Windows
Runtime requirements
Node.js
Detected file/system behavior
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
Detected network behavior
External requests
Install commands
None (reference only)

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview add-airline.preview
# Step 3 — Cross-fact-check via Copilot (THE Step 2 output)

**Copilot / ChatGPT fact-check prompt:**

> Fact-check the following content for the [Carrier Name] carrier page. Today's real-world date is [Month DD, YYYY].
>
> **REQUIRED METHOD:** Use web search / browsing tools to verify each claim against current sources. Do NOT rely on training data alone — for events from 2024 onward, training data may be stale or incomplete. If you cannot search, say so up front and stop.
>
> **For each claim:**
> 1. Search the open web with a 2026-dated source filter when relevant.
> 2. Cite the source URL + publication date for any disagreement, AND for confirmation of any recent (post-2024) event.
> 3. If you can't find a 2026-dated source that confirms OR denies a claim, return "❓ UNVERIFIED — needs current source." Do NOT mark a claim incorrect based on training-data memory alone — that's how you fabricate denials of real events.
>
> **Output format per claim:**
> > [claim] — [✅ CORRECT / ⚠️ NEEDS CLARIFICATION / ❌ INCORRECT / ❓ UNVERIFIED] — [URL + publication date if you found one]
>
> Flag only what is factually wrong by current evidence. Do NOT comment on style or voice.

---

**Content block to paste:**

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.