add 技能审计

数据 社区
解读按原文结构重写,命令、链接、术语均保留;右侧可核对作者原始 SKILL.md

方法与流程

  • Workflow — surface one step at a time:When triggered, FIRST do this: Read plans/airline-page-runbook.md end-to-end Read plans/sources/TEMPLATE.md so the source doc structure is fresh
  • Step 1 — Research the program (automated via research-program.mjs):Primary workflow: scrape the program's own pages directly via the research orchestrator, then WebSearch for gaps the orchestrator flags. User paste-in is only a last resort. Do this: Announce: "Step 1 — running research-program.mjs for <slug>."
  • Step 2 — Draft hedged content + emit Copilot fact-check block (Claude does this):LEAN WORKFLOW — do NOT dump a full 10-field combined preview to the user. The user does NOT want to read scattered drafts inline. Instead, after drafting internally: Output ONE thing only: the Copilot fact-check block (see Step 3 below for the exact format).…

适用与边界

  • Section milestone triggers:Watch the cumulative count of authored airlines: Airline 5 (US) → flag the Resources nav trigger (projectresourcesnavtrigger.md). Stop, ship the Resources dropdown PR, then continue. Airline 5 with loungeaccess populated → flag the Lounge Finder trigger…
  • Anti-patterns:❌ Dumping the whole 11-step list at once. Surface ONE step. ❌ Drafting from memory. Always web-search current 2026 sources. ❌ Accepting Copilot's fact-check uncritically. Settle disputes with date-checked sources.

原文中的明确线索

  • 要点:「Target automation level — Claude drives end to end. The user does TWO things」、「Spot-check the live page」、「Submit the URL to Google Search Console + Bing Webmaster Tools」、「Source of truth for the workflow」、「Read the type-matched runbook before drafting anything.」、「Source of truth for voice/rules」、「Note on program-row existence」、「Primary workflow」
  • 文件与命令add-programplans/handoff-.mdplans/airline-page-runbook.mdplans/hotel-page-runbook.mdMEMORY.mdfeedbackauthoringworkflow.mdfeedbackbrandvoicesassy.mdfeedbackpushbackmanualoptions.md

流狐整理:以上内容来自当前 SKILL.md 的章节与原词;未补写作者没有声明的工具、兼容性或能力。

流狐档案 作者与许可取自来源;运行、权限和网络为流狐检测或估算
流狐分类
数据
作者声明 Agent
未找到明确声明;不据此推断已兼容或已测试
静态检查
88 / 100 · 启发式扫描,不代表运行安全
作者 / 版本 / 许可
@jillyz250 · 未声明 license
流狐 Token 估算
较高消耗
流狐接入估算
需简单配置
是否需要外部 API Key
未发现要求
检测到的系统要求
macOS · Linux · Windows
底层运行要求
Node.js
检测到的文件与系统行为
  • 只读
  • 允许写入 / 修改
  • Shell 执行
检测到的网络行为
允许外网请求
安装命令数
无(仅作为资料)

档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。

需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

输出预览 add-airline.preview
# Step 3 — Cross-fact-check via Copilot (THE Step 2 output)

**Copilot / ChatGPT fact-check prompt:**

> Fact-check the following content for the [Carrier Name] carrier page. Today's real-world date is [Month DD, YYYY].
>
> **REQUIRED METHOD:** Use web search / browsing tools to verify each claim against current sources. Do NOT rely on training data alone — for events from 2024 onward, training data may be stale or incomplete. If you cannot search, say so up front and stop.
>
> **For each claim:**
> 1. Search the open web with a 2026-dated source filter when relevant.
> 2. Cite the source URL + publication date for any disagreement, AND for confirmation of any recent (post-2024) event.
> 3. If you can't find a 2026-dated source that confirms OR denies a claim, return "❓ UNVERIFIED — needs current source." Do NOT mark a claim incorrect based on training-data memory alone — that's how you fabricate denials of real events.
>
> **Output format per claim:**
> > [claim] — [✅ CORRECT / ⚠️ NEEDS CLARIFICATION / ❌ INCORRECT / ❓ UNVERIFIED] — [URL + publication date if you found one]
>
> Flag only what is factually wrong by current evidence. Do NOT comment on style or voice.

---

**Content block to paste:**

讨论

基于 GitHub Discussions。登录 GitHub 即可参与讨论、点赞、订阅更新。