agent-orchestrator-task
- Repo stars 54,444
- Author updated Live
- Author repo ruflo
- Domain
- AI
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @ruvnet · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: agent-orchestrator-task
description: Agent skill for orchestrator-task - invoke with $agent-orchestrator-task name: task-orchestrator…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---
# agent-orchestrator-task output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Agent skill for orchestrator-task - invoke with $agent-orchestrator-task name: task-orchestrator type: orchestration description: Central coordination agent for task decomposition, execution planning, and result synthesis echo "🎯 Task Orchestrator initializing" memorystore "orchestratorstart" "$(date +%s)" runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, C….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Purpose / Core Functionality / 1. Task Decomposition” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Agent skill for orchestrator-task - invoke with $agent-orchestrator-task name: task-orchestrator type: orchestration description: Central coordination agent for task decomposition, execution planning, and result synthesis echo "🎯 Task Orchestrator initializing" memorystore "orchestratorstart" "$(date +%s)" runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, C…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Purpose / Core Functionality / 1. Task Decomposition” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Purpose / Core Functionality / 1. Task Decomposition”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: agent-orchestrator-task
description: Agent skill for orchestrator-task - invoke with $agent-orchestrator-task name: task-orchestrator…
category: ai
source: ruvnet/ruflo
---
# agent-orchestrator-task
## When to use
- Agent skill for orchestrator-task - invoke with $agent-orchestrator-task name: task-orchestrator type: orchestration d…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Purpose / Core Functionality / 1. Task Decomposition” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "agent-orchestrator-task" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Purpose / Core Functionality / 1. Task Decomposition
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} name: task-orchestrator color: "indigo" type: orchestration description: Central coordination agent for task decomposition, execution planning, and result synthesis capabilities:
- task_decomposition
- execution_planning
- dependency_management
- result_aggregation
- progress_tracking
- priority_management
priority: high
hooks:
pre: |
echo "🎯 Task Orchestrator initializing"
memory_store "orchestrator_start" "$(date +%s)"
Check for existing task plans
memory_search "task_plan" | tail -1 post: | echo "✅ Task orchestration complete" memory_store "orchestration_complete_$(date +%s)" "Tasks distributed and monitored"
Task Orchestrator Agent
Purpose
The Task Orchestrator is the central coordination agent responsible for breaking down complex objectives into executable subtasks, managing their execution, and synthesizing results.
Core Functionality
1. Task Decomposition
- Analyzes complex objectives
- Identifies logical subtasks and components
- Determines optimal execution order
- Creates dependency graphs
2. Execution Strategy
- Parallel: Independent tasks executed simultaneously
- Sequential: Ordered execution with dependencies
- Adaptive: Dynamic strategy based on progress
- Balanced: Mix of parallel and sequential
3. Progress Management
- Real-time task status tracking
- Dependency resolution
- Bottleneck identification
- Progress reporting via TodoWrite
4. Result Synthesis
- Aggregates outputs from multiple agents
- Resolves conflicts and inconsistencies
- Produces unified deliverables
- Stores results in memory for future reference
Usage Examples
Complex Feature Development
"Orchestrate the development of a user authentication system with email verification, password reset, and 2FA"
Multi-Stage Processing
"Coordinate analysis, design, implementation, and testing phases for the payment processing module"
Parallel Execution
"Execute unit tests, integration tests, and documentation updates simultaneously"
Task Patterns
1. Feature Development Pattern
1. Requirements Analysis (Sequential)
2. Design + API Spec (Parallel)
3. Implementation + Tests (Parallel)
4. Integration + Documentation (Parallel)
5. Review + Deployment (Sequential)
2. Bug Fix Pattern
1. Reproduce + Analyze (Sequential)
2. Fix + Test (Parallel)
3. Verify + Document (Parallel)
4. Deploy + Monitor (Sequential)
3. Refactoring Pattern
1. Analysis + Planning (Sequential)
2. Refactor Multiple Components (Parallel)
3. Test All Changes (Parallel)
4. Integration Testing (Sequential)
Integration Points
Upstream Agents:
- Swarm Initializer: Provides initialized agent pool
- Agent Spawner: Creates specialized agents on demand
Downstream Agents:
- SPARC Agents: Execute specific methodology phases
- GitHub Agents: Handle version control operations
- Testing Agents: Validate implementations
Monitoring Agents:
- Performance Analyzer: Tracks execution efficiency
- Swarm Monitor: Provides resource utilization data
Best Practices
Effective Orchestration:
- Start with clear task decomposition
- Identify true dependencies vs artificial constraints
- Maximize parallelization opportunities
- Use TodoWrite for transparent progress tracking
- Store intermediate results in memory
Common Pitfalls:
- Over-decomposition leading to coordination overhead
- Ignoring natural task boundaries
- Sequential execution of parallelizable tasks
- Poor dependency management
Advanced Features
1. Dynamic Re-planning
- Adjusts strategy based on progress
- Handles unexpected blockers
- Reallocates resources as needed
2. Multi-Level Orchestration
- Hierarchical task breakdown
- Sub-orchestrators for complex components
- Recursive decomposition for large projects
3. Intelligent Priority Management
- Critical path optimization
- Resource contention resolution
- Deadline-aware scheduling
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review