agent-performance-benchmarker
- Repo stars 54,444
- Author updated Live
- Author repo ruflo
- Domain
- AI
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @ruvnet · no license declared
- Token usage
- Moderate
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: agent-performance-benchmarker
description: Agent skill for performance-benchmarker - invoke with $agent-performance-benchmarker name: perfo…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---
# agent-performance-benchmarker output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Agent skill for performance-benchmarker - invoke with $agent-performance-benchmarker name: performance-benchmarker color: "#607D8B" description: Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking for distributed consensus protocols priority: medium echo "📊 Performance Benchmarker analyzing: $TASK" runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cli….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Core Responsibilities / Technical Implementation / Core Benchmarking Framework” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Agent skill for performance-benchmarker - invoke with $agent-performance-benchmarker name: performance-benchmarker color: "#607D8B" description: Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking for distributed consensus protocols priority: medium echo "📊 Performance Benchmarker analyzing: $TASK" runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cli…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Core Responsibilities / Technical Implementation / Core Benchmarking Framework” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Core Responsibilities / Technical Implementation / Core Benchmarking Framework”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: agent-performance-benchmarker
description: Agent skill for performance-benchmarker - invoke with $agent-performance-benchmarker name: perfo…
category: ai
source: ruvnet/ruflo
---
# agent-performance-benchmarker
## When to use
- Agent skill for performance-benchmarker - invoke with $agent-performance-benchmarker name: performance-benchmarker col…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Core Responsibilities / Technical Implementation / Core Benchmarking Framework” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "agent-performance-benchmarker" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Core Responsibilities / Technical Implementation / Core Benchmarking Framework
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} name: performance-benchmarker type: analyst color: "#607D8B" description: Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking for distributed consensus protocols capabilities:
- throughput_measurement
- latency_analysis
- resource_monitoring
- comparative_analysis
- adaptive_tuning
priority: medium
hooks:
pre: |
echo "📊 Performance Benchmarker analyzing: $TASK"
Initialize monitoring systems
if [[ "$TASK" == "benchmark" ]]; then echo "⚡ Starting performance metric collection" fi post: | echo "📈 Performance analysis complete"Generate performance report
echo "📋 Compiling benchmarking results and recommendations"
Performance Benchmarker
Implements comprehensive performance benchmarking and optimization analysis for distributed consensus protocols.
Core Responsibilities
- Protocol Benchmarking: Measure throughput, latency, and scalability across consensus algorithms
- Resource Monitoring: Track CPU, memory, network, and storage utilization patterns
- Comparative Analysis: Compare Byzantine, Raft, and Gossip protocol performance
- Adaptive Tuning: Implement real-time parameter optimization and load balancing
- Performance Reporting: Generate actionable insights and optimization recommendations
Technical Implementation
Core Benchmarking Framework
class ConsensusPerformanceBenchmarker {
constructor() {
this.benchmarkSuites = new Map();
this.performanceMetrics = new Map();
this.historicalData = new TimeSeriesDatabase();
this.currentBenchmarks = new Set();
this.adaptiveOptimizer = new AdaptiveOptimizer();
this.alertSystem = new PerformanceAlertSystem();
}
// Register benchmark suite for specific consensus protocol
registerBenchmarkSuite(protocolName, benchmarkConfig) {
const suite = new BenchmarkSuite(protocolName, benchmarkConfig);
this.benchmarkSuites.set(protocolName, suite);
return suite;
}
// Execute comprehensive performance benchmarks
async runComprehensiveBenchmarks(protocols, scenarios) {
const results = new Map();
for (const protocol of protocols) {
const protocolResults = new Map();
for (const scenario of scenarios) {
console.log(`Running ${scenario.name} benchmark for ${protocol}`);
const benchmarkResult = await this.executeBenchmarkScenario(
protocol, scenario
);
protocolResults.set(scenario.name, benchmarkResult);
// Store in historical database
await this.historicalData.store({
protocol: protocol,
scenario: scenario.name,
timestamp: Date.now(),
metrics: benchmarkResult
});
}
results.set(protocol, protocolResults);
}
// Generate comparative analysis
const analysis = await this.generateComparativeAnalysis(results);
// Trigger adaptive optimizations
await this.adaptiveOptimizer.optimizeBasedOnResults(results);
return {
benchmarkResults: results,
comparativeAnalysis: analysis,
recommendations: await this.generateOptimizationRecommendations(results)
};
}
async executeBenchmarkScenario(protocol, scenario) {
const benchmark = this.benchmarkSuites.get(protocol);
if (!benchmark) {
throw new Error(`No benchmark suite found for protocol: ${protocol}`);
}
// Initialize benchmark environment
const environment = await this.setupBenchmarkEnvironment(scenario);
try {
// Pre-benchmark setup
await benchmark.setup(environment);
// Execute benchmark phases
const results = {
throughput: await this.measureThroughput(benchmark, scenario),
latency: await this.measureLatency(benchmark, scenario),
resourceUsage: await this.measureResourceUsage(benchmark, scenario),
scalability: await this.measureScalability(benchmark, scenario),
faultTolerance: await this.measureFaultTolerance(benchmark, scenario)
};
// Post-benchmark analysis
results.analysis = await this.analyzeBenchmarkResults(results);
return results;
} finally {
// Cleanup benchmark environment
await this.cleanupBenchmarkEnvironment(environment);
}
}
}
Throughput Measurement System
class ThroughputBenchmark {
constructor(protocol, configuration) {
this.protocol = protocol;
this.config = configuration;
this.metrics = new MetricsCollector();
this.loadGenerator = new LoadGenerator();
}
async measureThroughput(scenario) {
const measurements = [];
const duration = scenario.duration || 60000; // 1 minute default
const startTime = Date.now();
// Initialize load generator
await this.loadGenerator.initialize({
requestRate: scenario.initialRate || 10,
rampUp: scenario.rampUp || false,
pattern: scenario.pattern || 'constant'
});
// Start metrics collection
this.metrics.startCollection(['transactions_per_second', 'success_rate']);
let currentRate = scenario.initialRate || 10;
const rateIncrement = scenario.rateIncrement || 5;
const measurementInterval = 5000; // 5 seconds
while (Date.now() - startTime < duration) {
const intervalStart = Date.now();
// Generate load for this interval
const transactions = await this.generateTransactionLoad(
currentRate, measurementInterval
);
// Measure throughput for this interval
const intervalMetrics = await this.measureIntervalThroughput(
transactions, measurementInterval
);
measurements.push({
timestamp: intervalStart,
requestRate: currentRate,
actualThroughput: intervalMetrics.throughput,
successRate: intervalMetrics.successRate,
averageLatency: intervalMetrics.averageLatency,
p95Latency: intervalMetrics.p95Latency,
p99Latency: intervalMetrics.p99Latency
});
// Adaptive rate adjustment
if (scenario.rampUp && intervalMetrics.successRate > 0.95) {
currentRate += rateIncrement;
} else if (intervalMetrics.successRate < 0.8) {
currentRate = Math.max(1, currentRate - rateIncrement);
}
// Wait for next interval
const elapsed = Date.now() - intervalStart;
if (elapsed < measurementInterval) {
await this.sleep(measurementInterval - elapsed);
}
}
// Stop metrics collection
this.metrics.stopCollection();
// Analyze throughput results
return this.analyzeThroughputMeasurements(measurements);
}
async generateTransactionLoad(rate, duration) {
const transactions = [];
const interval = 1000 / rate; // Interval between transactions in ms
const endTime = Date.now() + duration;
while (Date.now() < endTime) {
const transactionStart = Date.now();
const transaction = {
id: `tx_${Date.now()}_${Math.random()}`,
type: this.getRandomTransactionType(),
data: this.generateTransactionData(),
timestamp: transactionStart
};
// Submit transaction to consensus protocol
const promise = this.protocol.submitTransaction(transaction)
.then(result => ({
...transaction,
result: result,
latency: Date.now() - transactionStart,
success: result.committed === true
}))
.catch(error => ({
...transaction,
error: error,
latency: Date.now() - transactionStart,
success: false
}));
transactions.push(promise);
// Wait for next transaction interval
await this.sleep(interval);
}
// Wait for all transactions to complete
return await Promise.all(transactions);
}
analyzeThroughputMeasurements(measurements) {
const totalMeasurements = measurements.length;
const avgThroughput = measurements.reduce((sum, m) => sum + m.actualThroughput, 0) / totalMeasurements;
const maxThroughput = Math.max(...measurements.map(m => m.actualThroughput));
const avgSuccessRate = measurements.reduce((sum, m) => sum + m.successRate, 0) / totalMeasurements;
// Find optimal operating point (highest throughput with >95% success rate)
const optimalPoints = measurements.filter(m => m.successRate >= 0.95);
const optimalThroughput = optimalPoints.length > 0 ?
Math.max(...optimalPoints.map(m => m.actualThroughput)) : 0;
return {
averageThroughput: avgThroughput,
maxThroughput: maxThroughput,
optimalThroughput: optimalThroughput,
averageSuccessRate: avgSuccessRate,
measurements: measurements,
sustainableThroughput: this.calculateSustainableThroughput(measurements),
throughputVariability: this.calculateThroughputVariability(measurements)
};
}
calculateSustainableThroughput(measurements) {
// Find the highest throughput that can be sustained for >80% of the time
const sortedThroughputs = measurements.map(m => m.actualThroughput).sort((a, b) => b - a);
const p80Index = Math.floor(sortedThroughputs.length * 0.2);
return sortedThroughputs[p80Index];
}
}
Latency Analysis System
class LatencyBenchmark {
constructor(protocol, configuration) {
this.protocol = protocol;
this.config = configuration;
this.latencyHistogram = new LatencyHistogram();
this.percentileCalculator = new PercentileCalculator();
}
async measureLatency(scenario) {
const measurements = [];
const sampleSize = scenario.sampleSize || 10000;
const warmupSize = scenario.warmupSize || 1000;
console.log(`Measuring latency with ${sampleSize} samples (${warmupSize} warmup)`);
// Warmup phase
await this.performWarmup(warmupSize);
// Measurement phase
for (let i = 0; i < sampleSize; i++) {
const latencyMeasurement = await this.measureSingleTransactionLatency();
measurements.push(latencyMeasurement);
// Progress reporting
if (i % 1000 === 0) {
console.log(`Completed ${i}/${sampleSize} latency measurements`);
}
}
// Analyze latency distribution
return this.analyzeLatencyDistribution(measurements);
}
async measureSingleTransactionLatency() {
const transaction = {
id: `latency_tx_${Date.now()}_${Math.random()}`,
type: 'benchmark',
data: { value: Math.random() },
phases: {}
};
// Phase 1: Submission
const submissionStart = performance.now();
const submissionPromise = this.protocol.submitTransaction(transaction);
transaction.phases.submission = performance.now() - submissionStart;
// Phase 2: Consensus
const consensusStart = performance.now();
const result = await submissionPromise;
transaction.phases.consensus = performance.now() - consensusStart;
// Phase 3: Application (if applicable)
let applicationLatency = 0;
if (result.applicationTime) {
applicationLatency = result.applicationTime;
}
transaction.phases.application = applicationLatency;
// Total end-to-end latency
const totalLatency = transaction.phases.submission +
transaction.phases.consensus +
transaction.phases.application;
return {
transactionId: transaction.id,
totalLatency: totalLatency,
phases: transaction.phases,
success: result.committed === true,
timestamp: Date.now()
};
}
analyzeLatencyDistribution(measurements) {
const successfulMeasurements = measurements.filter(m => m.success);
const latencies = successfulMeasurements.map(m => m.totalLatency);
if (latencies.length === 0) {
throw new Error('No successful latency measurements');
}
// Calculate percentiles
const percentiles = this.percentileCalculator.calculate(latencies, [
50, 75, 90, 95, 99, 99.9, 99.99
]);
// Phase-specific analysis
const phaseAnalysis = this.analyzePhaseLatencies(successfulMeasurements);
// Latency distribution analysis
const distribution = this.analyzeLatencyHistogram(latencies);
return {
sampleSize: successfulMeasurements.length,
mean: latencies.reduce((sum, l) => sum + l, 0) / latencies.length,
median: percentiles[50],
standardDeviation: this.calculateStandardDeviation(latencies),
percentiles: percentiles,
phaseAnalysis: phaseAnalysis,
distribution: distribution,
outliers: this.identifyLatencyOutliers(latencies)
};
}
analyzePhaseLatencies(measurements) {
const phases = ['submission', 'consensus', 'application'];
const phaseAnalysis = {};
for (const phase of phases) {
const phaseLatencies = measurements.map(m => m.phases[phase]);
const validLatencies = phaseLatencies.filter(l => l > 0);
if (validLatencies.length > 0) {
phaseAnalysis[phase] = {
mean: validLatencies.reduce((sum, l) => sum + l, 0) / validLatencies.length,
p50: this.percentileCalculator.calculate(validLatencies, [50])[50],
p95: this.percentileCalculator.calculate(validLatencies, [95])[95],
p99: this.percentileCalculator.calculate(validLatencies, [99])[99],
max: Math.max(...validLatencies),
contributionPercent: (validLatencies.reduce((sum, l) => sum + l, 0) /
measurements.reduce((sum, m) => sum + m.totalLatency, 0)) * 100
};
}
}
return phaseAnalysis;
}
}
Resource Usage Monitor
class ResourceUsageMonitor {
constructor() {
this.monitoringActive = false;
this.samplingInterval = 1000; // 1 second
this.measurements = [];
this.systemMonitor = new SystemMonitor();
}
async measureResourceUsage(protocol, scenario) {
console.log('Starting resource usage monitoring');
this.monitoringActive = true;
this.measurements = [];
// Start monitoring in background
const monitoringPromise = this.startContinuousMonitoring();
try {
// Execute the benchmark scenario
const benchmarkResult = await this.executeBenchmarkWithMonitoring(
protocol, scenario
);
// Stop monitoring
this.monitoringActive = false;
await monitoringPromise;
// Analyze resource usage
const resourceAnalysis = this.analyzeResourceUsage();
return {
benchmarkResult: benchmarkResult,
resourceUsage: resourceAnalysis
};
} catch (error) {
this.monitoringActive = false;
throw error;
}
}
async startContinuousMonitoring() {
while (this.monitoringActive) {
const measurement = await this.collectResourceMeasurement();
this.measurements.push(measurement);
await this.sleep(this.samplingInterval);
}
}
async collectResourceMeasurement() {
const timestamp = Date.now();
// CPU usage
const cpuUsage = await this.systemMonitor.getCPUUsage();
// Memory usage
const memoryUsage = await this.systemMonitor.getMemoryUsage();
// Network I/O
const networkIO = await this.systemMonitor.getNetworkIO();
// Disk I/O
const diskIO = await this.systemMonitor.getDiskIO();
// Process-specific metrics
const processMetrics = await this.systemMonitor.getProcessMetrics();
return {
timestamp: timestamp,
cpu: {
totalUsage: cpuUsage.total,
consensusUsage: cpuUsage.process,
loadAverage: cpuUsage.loadAverage,
coreUsage: cpuUsage.cores
},
memory: {
totalUsed: memoryUsage.used,
totalAvailable: memoryUsage.available,
processRSS: memoryUsage.processRSS,
processHeap: memoryUsage.processHeap,
gcStats: memoryUsage.gcStats
},
network: {
bytesIn: networkIO.bytesIn,
bytesOut: networkIO.bytesOut,
packetsIn: networkIO.packetsIn,
packetsOut: networkIO.packetsOut,
connectionsActive: networkIO.connectionsActive
},
disk: {
bytesRead: diskIO.bytesRead,
bytesWritten: diskIO.bytesWritten,
operationsRead: diskIO.operationsRead,
operationsWrite: diskIO.operationsWrite,
queueLength: diskIO.queueLength
},
process: {
consensusThreads: processMetrics.consensusThreads,
fileDescriptors: processMetrics.fileDescriptors,
uptime: processMetrics.uptime
}
};
}
analyzeResourceUsage() {
if (this.measurements.length === 0) {
return null;
}
const cpuAnalysis = this.analyzeCPUUsage();
const memoryAnalysis = this.analyzeMemoryUsage();
const networkAnalysis = this.analyzeNetworkUsage();
const diskAnalysis = this.analyzeDiskUsage();
return {
duration: this.measurements[this.measurements.length - 1].timestamp -
this.measurements[0].timestamp,
sampleCount: this.measurements.length,
cpu: cpuAnalysis,
memory: memoryAnalysis,
network: networkAnalysis,
disk: diskAnalysis,
efficiency: this.calculateResourceEfficiency(),
bottlenecks: this.identifyResourceBottlenecks()
};
}
analyzeCPUUsage() {
const cpuUsages = this.measurements.map(m => m.cpu.consensusUsage);
return {
average: cpuUsages.reduce((sum, usage) => sum + usage, 0) / cpuUsages.length,
peak: Math.max(...cpuUsages),
p95: this.calculatePercentile(cpuUsages, 95),
variability: this.calculateStandardDeviation(cpuUsages),
coreUtilization: this.analyzeCoreUtilization(),
trends: this.analyzeCPUTrends()
};
}
analyzeMemoryUsage() {
const memoryUsages = this.measurements.map(m => m.memory.processRSS);
const heapUsages = this.measurements.map(m => m.memory.processHeap);
return {
averageRSS: memoryUsages.reduce((sum, usage) => sum + usage, 0) / memoryUsages.length,
peakRSS: Math.max(...memoryUsages),
averageHeap: heapUsages.reduce((sum, usage) => sum + usage, 0) / heapUsages.length,
peakHeap: Math.max(...heapUsages),
memoryLeaks: this.detectMemoryLeaks(),
gcImpact: this.analyzeGCImpact(),
growth: this.calculateMemoryGrowth()
};
}
identifyResourceBottlenecks() {
const bottlenecks = [];
// CPU bottleneck detection
const avgCPU = this.measurements.reduce((sum, m) => sum + m.cpu.consensusUsage, 0) /
this.measurements.length;
if (avgCPU > 80) {
bottlenecks.push({
type: 'CPU',
severity: 'HIGH',
description: `High CPU usage (${avgCPU.toFixed(1)}%)`
});
}
// Memory bottleneck detection
const memoryGrowth = this.calculateMemoryGrowth();
if (memoryGrowth.rate > 1024 * 1024) { // 1MB$s growth
bottlenecks.push({
type: 'MEMORY',
severity: 'MEDIUM',
description: `High memory growth rate (${(memoryGrowth.rate / 1024 / 1024).toFixed(2)} MB$s)`
});
}
// Network bottleneck detection
const avgNetworkOut = this.measurements.reduce((sum, m) => sum + m.network.bytesOut, 0) /
this.measurements.length;
if (avgNetworkOut > 100 * 1024 * 1024) { // 100 MB$s
bottlenecks.push({
type: 'NETWORK',
severity: 'MEDIUM',
description: `High network output (${(avgNetworkOut / 1024 / 1024).toFixed(2)} MB$s)`
});
}
return bottlenecks;
}
}
Adaptive Performance Optimizer
class AdaptiveOptimizer {
constructor() {
this.optimizationHistory = new Map();
this.performanceModel = new PerformanceModel();
this.parameterTuner = new ParameterTuner();
this.currentOptimizations = new Map();
}
async optimizeBasedOnResults(benchmarkResults) {
const optimizations = [];
for (const [protocol, results] of benchmarkResults) {
const protocolOptimizations = await this.optimizeProtocol(protocol, results);
optimizations.push(...protocolOptimizations);
}
// Apply optimizations gradually
await this.applyOptimizations(optimizations);
return optimizations;
}
async optimizeProtocol(protocol, results) {
const optimizations = [];
// Analyze performance bottlenecks
const bottlenecks = this.identifyPerformanceBottlenecks(results);
for (const bottleneck of bottlenecks) {
const optimization = await this.generateOptimization(protocol, bottleneck);
if (optimization) {
optimizations.push(optimization);
}
}
// Parameter tuning based on performance characteristics
const parameterOptimizations = await this.tuneParameters(protocol, results);
optimizations.push(...parameterOptimizations);
return optimizations;
}
identifyPerformanceBottlenecks(results) {
const bottlenecks = [];
// Throughput bottlenecks
for (const [scenario, result] of results) {
if (result.throughput && result.throughput.optimalThroughput < result.throughput.maxThroughput * 0.8) {
bottlenecks.push({
type: 'THROUGHPUT_DEGRADATION',
scenario: scenario,
severity: 'HIGH',
impact: (result.throughput.maxThroughput - result.throughput.optimalThroughput) /
result.throughput.maxThroughput,
details: result.throughput
});
}
// Latency bottlenecks
if (result.latency && result.latency.p99 > result.latency.p50 * 10) {
bottlenecks.push({
type: 'LATENCY_TAIL',
scenario: scenario,
severity: 'MEDIUM',
impact: result.latency.p99 / result.latency.p50,
details: result.latency
});
}
// Resource bottlenecks
if (result.resourceUsage && result.resourceUsage.bottlenecks.length > 0) {
bottlenecks.push({
type: 'RESOURCE_CONSTRAINT',
scenario: scenario,
severity: 'HIGH',
details: result.resourceUsage.bottlenecks
});
}
}
return bottlenecks;
}
async generateOptimization(protocol, bottleneck) {
switch (bottleneck.type) {
case 'THROUGHPUT_DEGRADATION':
return await this.optimizeThroughput(protocol, bottleneck);
case 'LATENCY_TAIL':
return await this.optimizeLatency(protocol, bottleneck);
case 'RESOURCE_CONSTRAINT':
return await this.optimizeResourceUsage(protocol, bottleneck);
default:
return null;
}
}
async optimizeThroughput(protocol, bottleneck) {
const optimizations = [];
// Batch size optimization
if (protocol === 'raft') {
optimizations.push({
type: 'PARAMETER_ADJUSTMENT',
parameter: 'max_batch_size',
currentValue: await this.getCurrentParameter(protocol, 'max_batch_size'),
recommendedValue: this.calculateOptimalBatchSize(bottleneck.details),
expectedImprovement: '15-25% throughput increase',
confidence: 0.8
});
}
// Pipelining optimization
if (protocol === 'byzantine') {
optimizations.push({
type: 'FEATURE_ENABLE',
feature: 'request_pipelining',
description: 'Enable request pipelining to improve throughput',
expectedImprovement: '20-30% throughput increase',
confidence: 0.7
});
}
return optimizations.length > 0 ? optimizations[0] : null;
}
async tuneParameters(protocol, results) {
const optimizations = [];
// Use machine learning model to suggest parameter values
const parameterSuggestions = await this.performanceModel.suggestParameters(
protocol, results
);
for (const suggestion of parameterSuggestions) {
if (suggestion.confidence > 0.6) {
optimizations.push({
type: 'PARAMETER_TUNING',
parameter: suggestion.parameter,
currentValue: suggestion.currentValue,
recommendedValue: suggestion.recommendedValue,
expectedImprovement: suggestion.expectedImprovement,
confidence: suggestion.confidence,
rationale: suggestion.rationale
});
}
}
return optimizations;
}
async applyOptimizations(optimizations) {
// Sort by confidence and expected impact
const sortedOptimizations = optimizations.sort((a, b) =>
(b.confidence * parseFloat(b.expectedImprovement)) -
(a.confidence * parseFloat(a.expectedImprovement))
);
// Apply optimizations gradually
for (const optimization of sortedOptimizations) {
try {
await this.applyOptimization(optimization);
// Wait and measure impact
await this.sleep(30000); // 30 seconds
const impact = await this.measureOptimizationImpact(optimization);
if (impact.improvement < 0.05) {
// Revert if improvement is less than 5%
await this.revertOptimization(optimization);
} else {
// Keep optimization and record success
this.recordOptimizationSuccess(optimization, impact);
}
} catch (error) {
console.error(`Failed to apply optimization:`, error);
await this.revertOptimization(optimization);
}
}
}
}
MCP Integration Hooks
Performance Metrics Storage
// Store comprehensive benchmark results
await this.mcpTools.memory_usage({
action: 'store',
key: `benchmark_results_${protocol}_${Date.now()}`,
value: JSON.stringify({
protocol: protocol,
timestamp: Date.now(),
throughput: throughputResults,
latency: latencyResults,
resourceUsage: resourceResults,
optimizations: appliedOptimizations
}),
namespace: 'performance_benchmarks',
ttl: 604800000 // 7 days
});
// Real-time performance monitoring
await this.mcpTools.metrics_collect({
components: [
'consensus_throughput',
'consensus_latency_p99',
'cpu_utilization',
'memory_usage',
'network_io_rate'
]
});
Neural Performance Learning
// Learn performance optimization patterns
await this.mcpTools.neural_patterns({
action: 'learn',
operation: 'performance_optimization',
outcome: JSON.stringify({
optimizationType: optimization.type,
performanceGain: measurementResults.improvement,
resourceImpact: measurementResults.resourceDelta,
networkConditions: currentNetworkState
})
});
// Predict optimal configurations
const configPrediction = await this.mcpTools.neural_predict({
modelId: 'consensus_performance_model',
input: JSON.stringify({
workloadPattern: currentWorkload,
networkTopology: networkState,
resourceConstraints: systemResources
})
});
This Performance Benchmarker provides comprehensive performance analysis, optimization recommendations, and adaptive tuning capabilities for distributed consensus protocols.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review