agentic-labeler
- Repo stars 23,256
- Author updated Live
- Author repo maui
- Domain
- AI
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @dotnet · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- macOS · Windows
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- External requests
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: agentic-labeler
description: >- Labeling rules for the dotnet/maui repository. These rules are the canonical source of truth…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---
# agentic-labeler output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: >- Labeling rules for the dotnet/maui repository. These rules are the canonical source of truth for how issues and PRs should be labeled. They are consumed by the agentic-labeler gh-aw workflow and can also be used standalone for batch evaluation or interactive labeling. makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “🚨 Scope: area- and platform/ ONLY / Label discovery / Labeling rules” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “>- Labeling rules for the dotnet/maui repository. These rules are the canonical source of truth for how issues and PRs should be labeled. They are consumed by the agentic-labeler gh-aw workflow and can also be used standalone for batch evaluation or interactive labeling. makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “🚨 Scope: area- and platform/ ONLY / Label discovery / Labeling rules” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/platform`, `/platforms`, `/handlers`, `/android`, `/ios`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “🚨 Scope: area- and platform/ ONLY / Label discovery / Labeling rules”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: agentic-labeler
description: >- Labeling rules for the dotnet/maui repository. These rules are the canonical source of truth…
category: ai
source: dotnet/maui
---
# agentic-labeler
## When to use
- >- Labeling rules for the dotnet/maui repository. These rules are the canonical source of truth for how issues and PRs…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “🚨 Scope: area- and platform/ ONLY / Label discovery / Labeling rules” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "agentic-labeler" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> 🚨 Scope: area- and platform/ ONLY / Label discovery / Labeling rules
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | may access external network resources
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Agentic Labeler
Labeling rules for the dotnet/maui repository. These rules are the canonical source of truth for how issues and PRs should be labeled. They are consumed by the agentic-labeler gh-aw workflow and can also be used standalone for batch evaluation or interactive labeling.
🚨 Scope: area-* and platform/* ONLY
The labeler applies only two label families, and nothing else:
- Exactly one
area-*— derived from the subject matter (control name, area like layout / navigation / xaml / infrastructure / etc.). Choose the single most specific match for the dominant subsystem; see the tie-breaking rules below. - One or more
platform/*— derived from changed-file platform conventions on PRs, or from explicit platform mentions on issues. Apply all that fit.
The labeler must NOT apply any other label, ever. Specifically, do not apply:
t/*(kind:t/bug,t/enhancement ☀️,t/docs 📝,t/breaking 💥,t/native-embedding,t/desktop,t/a11y, etc.) — the issue/PR author or other automation owns these.i/*(indicators:i/regression, etc.) — set during triage based on investigation, not initial content.s/*(status:s/needs-info,s/needs-repro,s/needs-verification,s/needs-attention,s/triaged,s/verified,s/no-repro,s/not-a-bug,s/duplicate 2️⃣,s/pr-needs-author-input, etc.) — managed bydotnet-policy-service[bot]and human triagers.p/*(priority:p/0,p/1,p/2,p/3) — set by maintainers.partner/*(e.g.,partner/syncfusion) — set by partner-tracking automation.perf/*(e.g.,perf/memory-leak 💦) — set during perf investigation.backport/*,regressed-in-*,version/*— set during triage / release management.untriaged,:watch: Not Triaged— applied by repo automation on issue open.- Anything else that is not literally an
area-*orplatform/*label.
If the only labels that clearly apply are not area-* or platform/*, noop instead — see the noop section below.
If neither an area-* nor a platform/* label clearly applies, noop.
Label discovery
- Fetch the current list of labels using the
list_labelMCP tool (provided by thelabelstoolset). Note the singular name — it islist_label, notlist_labels. - Important pagination caveat: the
list_labeltool only returns the first ~100 labels (no pagination). This repo has ~440 labels, so manyarea-*andplatform/*labels will be missing from the listing. If you have a strong candidatearea-*orplatform/*label name in mind that isn't in the listing, verify it exists with theget_labeltool before adding it. - Do not create new labels — only labels that already exist in the repository will be accepted.
Labeling rules
area-* label (issues and PRs) — exactly one
Apply exactly one area-* label. Pick the single most specific match for the dominant subsystem:
- Specific control mentioned → matching
area-controls-<name>(e.g.,CollectionView→area-controls-collectionview,Entry→area-controls-entry,Map/Maps→area-controls-map,Window→area-controls-window,WebView→area-controls-webview,HybridWebView→area-controls-hybridwebview). Always use thearea-controls-<name>prefix — never invent shorter aliases (e.g., the Maps area isarea-controls-map, notarea-maps). - Layout, measure/arrange, sizing issues →
area-layout. - Navigation, Shell routing, page navigation →
area-navigation(orarea-controls-shellwhen Shell-specific). - XAML parsing, markup extensions, XamlC, source generators →
area-xaml. - Hot reload, build, MSBuild, workload, project templates, tooling →
area-tooling,area-templates, orarea-setupas appropriate. - BlazorWebView / Blazor hybrid →
area-blazor. - Essentials APIs (non-UI: connectivity, sensors, preferences, etc.) →
area-essentials. - Drawing / Microsoft.Maui.Graphics →
area-drawing. - Gestures (tap, pan, swipe, pinch) →
area-gestures. - Lifecycle, hosting, app startup, DI →
area-core-lifecycle/area-core-hosting. - Dispatcher / main thread / threading →
area-core-dispatching. - Localization / RTL / culture →
area-localization. - Docs only →
area-docs. - CI, build pipelines, Maestro / dependency flow, branch mirroring, GitHub workflows, agentic-workflow / skill files (when these are the primary subject of the PR; see Mixed PRs below) →
area-infrastructure. This covers:[dnceng-bot]codeflow/branch-mirroring issues (the standard "Branch…can't be mirrored to Azdo" issues) →area-infrastructure(do not noop these — they have a clear area).- PRs touching only
.github/workflows/,.github/skills/,.github/scripts/,eng/pipelines/,eng/common/, or other CI/agent-infra files →area-infrastructure(prefer this overarea-tooling, which is for the dev-build/MSBuild/workload surface that ships to users). - Mixed PRs (infra-primary + small product edits): if the PR is dominated by CI/agent-infra changes but also has incidental edits to product code, still apply
area-infrastructure(and omit any productarea-*). If the product-code change is the focus and the infra change is incidental (e.g., a small workflow tweak that supports a feature), prefer the productarea-*label and omitarea-infrastructure.
Tie-breaking when multiple areas could apply — pick the single most specific:
- Specific control beats generic area.
area-controls-tabbedpageoverarea-navigation;area-controls-collectionviewoverarea-layout;area-controls-shelloverarea-navigation. - Sub-area beats parent area.
area-safeareaoverarea-layout;area-core-dispatchingoverarea-core-lifecycle. - Subject-matter focus beats incidental touch. If a PR fixes a CollectionView bug by adjusting layout code, the area is the control (
area-controls-collectionview), not the layout system. - When genuinely tied, prefer the area that names the user-visible feature over the implementation-detail area.
If after applying these heuristics there is still no single best fit, noop rather than apply two area labels.
platform/* labels
This is the most important behavior for PRs.
For pull requests, infer platform/* labels primarily from the changed files, using the rules below. Each rule maps a file pattern to one or more platform labels. Apply a platform/* label if any changed file matches that pattern. The path patterns intentionally target the established MAUI source-layout conventions — match the patterns in the table below (e.g., /Platform/<Name>/, /Platforms/<Name>/, /Handlers/*/<Name>/). Do not match on a bare top-level /Android/, /iOS/, /Windows/, or /MacCatalyst/ segment that is not part of one of the patterns in the table — bare segments occur in templates, docs, and unrelated tooling paths and are not platform-specific source code.
Note on iOS / MacCatalyst: file-extension patterns and directory patterns map differently because of MAUI's compilation conventions — they are split into separate rows below.
| File pattern (changed in the PR) | Label(s) to apply |
|---|---|
*.android.cs, *.Android.cs, paths containing /Platform/Android/, /Platforms/Android/, /AndroidNative/, or handler subdirectories like /Handlers/*/Android/ |
platform/android |
*.ios.cs, *.iOS.cs (file-extension pattern — these compile for both iOS and MacCatalyst) |
platform/ios and platform/macos |
Paths containing /Platform/iOS/, /Platforms/iOS/, or handler subdirectories like /Handlers/*/iOS/ (directory pattern — these compile only for the iOS TFM) |
platform/ios only |
*.maccatalyst.cs, *.MacCatalyst.cs, paths containing /Platform/MacCatalyst/, /Platforms/MacCatalyst/, or handler subdirectories like /Handlers/*/MacCatalyst/ |
platform/macos |
*.windows.cs, *.Windows.cs, paths containing /Platform/Windows/, /Platforms/Windows/, or handler subdirectories like /Handlers/*/Windows/ |
platform/windows |
*.tizen.cs, paths containing /Platform/Tizen/, /Platforms/Tizen/ |
platform/tizen |
Notes:
- If a PR touches only shared / cross-platform code (e.g.,
src/Core/src/*.cswithout a platform suffix, orsrc/Controls/src/Core/), do not apply anyplatform/*label. - If a PR touches multiple platforms, apply each matching
platform/*label. .ios.csfiles compile for both iOS and MacCatalyst (see split table rows above)..maccatalyst.csfiles do not compile for iOS — apply onlyplatform/macosfor those.
For issues, infer platform/* labels only if the reporter clearly indicates a platform (explicit mention of Android / iOS / macOS / Windows / Tizen in the title, body, or attached logs/stack traces). Do not guess. If the report says "all platforms" or doesn't specify, apply no platform/* label.
When to noop (no labels)
Some items should not be labeled. If any of the following apply, skip labeling entirely:
- Automated inter-branch merge PRs — titles like
[automated] Merge branch 'main' => 'net11.0'or similar bot-created merge PRs. These are infrastructure, not feature/bug work. - Dependency bump PRs that already have
dependenciesandarea-infrastructurelabels. - Items where no
area-*orplatform/*label clearly fits — when the content is too vague or ambiguous to determine area or platform with confidence, or when the only labels that would apply are outside the allowedarea-*/platform/*scope.
⚠️ Do NOT noop
[dnceng-bot]codeflow/branch-mirroring issues. Despite being bot-authored, they have a clear area (area-infrastructure) and should be labeled, not noop'd. The noop rule for automated PRs above is specifically about[automated] Merge branch …titles.
What NOT to do
- Do not apply any label that is not literally
area-*orplatform/*. Not/*,i/*,s/*,p/*,partner/*,perf/*,backport/*,regressed-in-*,version/*,untriaged,:watch: Not Triaged, or anything else. See the "Scope" section at the top for the full prohibition. - Do not create new labels — apply only labels that already exist in the repository.
- Do not add
platform/*labels to PRs that don't touch platform-specific files. - Do not post a comment summarizing the labels — labels speak for themselves.
- Do not close, lock, or otherwise modify the issue/PR beyond labeling.
- Do not label automated merge PRs — these are infrastructure, not actionable items.
- Be conservative; precision beats recall. Only apply
area-*orplatform/*labels that clearly fit.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review