best-minds
- Repo stars 99
- Author updated Live
- Author repo best-minds
- Domain
- Other
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @Ceeon · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: best-minds
description: output: 领域专家视角的回答 pos: 辅助 skill,思维方法论 架构守护者:一旦我被修改,请同步更新: 要问:这个问题,世界上谁最懂?TA 会怎么说? | ai-coaches |…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---
# best-minds output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: output: 领域专家视角的回答 pos: 辅助 skill,思维方法论 架构守护者:一旦我被修改,请同步更新: 要问:这个问题,世界上谁最懂?TA 会怎么说? | ai-coaches | best-minds | runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “核心 / 原则 / vs ai-coaches” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “output: 领域专家视角的回答 pos: 辅助 skill,思维方法论 架构守护者:一旦我被修改,请同步更新: 要问:这个问题,世界上谁最懂?TA 会怎么说? | ai-coaches | best-minds | runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “核心 / 原则 / vs ai-coaches” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “核心 / 原则 / vs ai-coaches”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: best-minds
description: output: 领域专家视角的回答 pos: 辅助 skill,思维方法论 架构守护者:一旦我被修改,请同步更新: 要问:这个问题,世界上谁最懂?TA 会怎么说? | ai-coaches |…
category: other
source: Ceeon/best-minds
---
# best-minds
## When to use
- <!-- input: 用户问题 output: 领域专家视角的回答 pos: 辅助 skill,思维方法论 架构守护者:一旦我被修改,请同步更新: 1. 本文件的头部注释 2. 所属文件夹的 README.md -- "Don't t…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “核心 / 原则 / vs ai-coaches” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "best-minds" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> 核心 / 原则 / vs ai-coaches
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Best Minds
"Don't think of LLMs as entities but as simulators." — Andrej Karpathy
核心
不要问 AI "你怎么看"。
要问:这个问题,世界上谁最懂?TA 会怎么说?
然后模拟那个人。
原则
- 问题决定人数 — 一个人够就一个,需要碰撞才多个
- 找真正最懂的 — 不是找"合适的",是找"最强的"
- 基于真实 — 模拟要基于 TA 公开的思想、著作、言论
- 引用原话 — 尽可能用 TA 说过的话
vs ai-coaches
| ai-coaches | best-minds |
|---|---|
| 从 13 个预设智者选 | 从全世界找 |
| 基于关键词匹配 | 基于问题本质 |
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review