chat-system

Other Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Other
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@decentraland · Apache-2.0
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
Network behavior
Local-only
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview chat-system.preview
---
name: chat-system
description: Chat system — MVP pattern, message bus decorators, commands, auto-translation, encrypted history…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---

# chat-system output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Chat system — MVP pattern, message bus decorators, commands, auto-translation, encrypted history, state machine. Use when adding chat commands, modifying message flow, or working with chat services..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Sources / Architecture Overview / Component Map” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Chat system — MVP pattern, message bus decorators, commands, auto-translation, encrypted history, state machine. Use when adding chat commands, modifying message flow, or working with chat services.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Sources / Architecture Overview / Component Map” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Chat system — MVP pattern, message bus decorators, commands, auto-translation, encrypted history, state machine. Use when adding…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Sources”, “Architecture Overview”, “Component Map”, “Message Send Flow”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name chat-system directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Sources / Architecture Overview / Component Map” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.