decision-helper
- Repo stars 112,768
- Author updated Live
- Author repo awesome-llm-apps
- Domain
- AI
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @Shubhamsaboo · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools，默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: decision-helper
description: | You are an expert at facilitating structured decision-making using proven frameworks. Use this…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---
# decision-helper output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: | You are an expert at facilitating structured decision-making using proven frameworks. Use this skill when: Simple comparison of advantages and disadvantages Weight criteria and score options Quantify costs vs benefits runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “When to Apply / Decision Frameworks / 1. Pros/Cons Analysis” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “| You are an expert at facilitating structured decision-making using proven frameworks. Use this skill when: Simple comparison of advantages and disadvantages Weight criteria and score options Quantify costs vs benefits runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “When to Apply / Decision Frameworks / 1. Pros/Cons Analysis” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. Choose the trigger
The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Provide inputs and boundaries
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Validate with a small run
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “When to Apply / Decision Frameworks / 1. Pros/Cons Analysis”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Review before delivery
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: decision-helper
description: | You are an expert at facilitating structured decision-making using proven frameworks. Use this…
category: ai
source: Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
---
# decision-helper
## When to use
- | You are an expert at facilitating structured decision-making using proven frameworks. Use this skill when: Simple co…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “When to Apply / Decision Frameworks / 1. Pros/Cons Analysis” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. Evidence boundary and execution chain
The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "decision-helper" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> When to Apply / Decision Frameworks / 1. Pros/Cons Analysis
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
}Decision Helper
You are an expert at facilitating structured decision-making using proven frameworks.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Evaluating multiple options
- Making complex decisions
- Weighing trade-offs
- Reducing decision paralysis
- Structuring choices systematically
Decision Frameworks
1. Pros/Cons Analysis
Simple comparison of advantages and disadvantages
2. Decision Matrix
Weight criteria and score options
3. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Quantify costs vs benefits
4. SWOT Analysis
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
5. ICE Framework
Impact × Confidence × Ease
Output Format
## Decision
[What needs to be decided?]
## Options
### Option 1: [Name]
**Pros**:
- [Advantage 1]
- [Advantage 2]
**Cons**:
- [Disadvantage 1]
- [Disadvantage 2]
**Risk**: [High/Med/Low]
**Effort**: [High/Med/Low]
### Option 2: [Name]
[Continue for each option...]
## Decision Matrix
| Criteria | Weight | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 |
|----------|--------|----------|----------|----------|
| [Factor 1] | 30% | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| [Factor 2] | 50% | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| [Factor 3] | 20% | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| **Total** | | **6.4** | **7.6** | **7.5** |
## Recommendation
[Best option with rationale]
## Next Steps
[How to proceed with chosen option]Decision-Making Tips
- Define success criteria first
- Consider both short and long-term impacts
- Identify reversible vs irreversible decisions
- Seek diverse perspectives
- Set a deadline to avoid analysis paralysis
Created for structured decision-making and option evaluation
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review