django-security

DevOps Community
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
DevOps
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
88 / 100 · community maintained
Author / version / license
@tomevault-io · no license declared
Token usage
Heavy
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Required · Vendor-specific
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
Python
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Env read
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview django-security.preview
---
name: django-security
description: Django security best practices, authentication, authorization, CSRF protection, SQL injection pr…
category: devops
runtime: Python
---

# django-security output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Django security best practices, authentication, authorization, CSRF protection, SQL injection prevention, XSS prevention, and secure deployment configurations. Use when this capability is needed..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “いつ有効化するか / 核となるセキュリティ設定 / 本番設定の構成” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Django security best practices, authentication, authorization, CSRF protection, SQL injection prevention, XSS prevention, and secure deployment configurations. Use when this capability is needed.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “いつ有効化するか / 核となるセキュリティ設定 / 本番設定の構成” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, read environment variables; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, read environment variables; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Django security best practices, authentication, authorization, CSRF protection, SQL injection prevention, XSS prevention, and se…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “いつ有効化するか”, “核となるセキュリティ設定”, “本番設定の構成”, “認証”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name django-security directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “いつ有効化するか / 核となるセキュリティ設定 / 本番設定の構成” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare Vendor-specific API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / env-read; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.