gh-issue
- Repo stars 330
- License MIT
- Author updated Live
- Author repo claude-skill-registry
- Domain
- Data
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 94 / 100 · audit passed
- Author / version / license
- @majiayu000 · MIT
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: gh-issue
description: Create a GitHub issue following project guidelines Create a new GitHub issue for the gittower/gi…
category: data
runtime: no special runtime
---
# gh-issue output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Create a GitHub issue following project guidelines Create a new GitHub issue for the gittower/git-flow-next repository following project guidelines. <Clear description of the bug> <What should happen> <What actually happens> <Clear description of the enhancement/feature> runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Instructions / Issue Body Templates / Bug Report” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Create a GitHub issue following project guidelines Create a new GitHub issue for the gittower/git-flow-next repository following project guidelines. <Clear description of the bug> <What should happen> <What actually happens> <Clear description of the enhancement/feature> runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Instructions / Issue Body Templates / Bug Report” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/analyze-issue`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Instructions / Issue Body Templates / Bug Report”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: gh-issue
description: Create a GitHub issue following project guidelines Create a new GitHub issue for the gittower/gi…
category: data
source: majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
---
# gh-issue
## When to use
- Create a GitHub issue following project guidelines Create a new GitHub issue for the gittower/git-flow-next repository…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Instructions / Issue Body Templates / Bug Report” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "gh-issue" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Instructions / Issue Body Templates / Bug Report
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Create GitHub Issue
Create a new GitHub issue for the gittower/git-flow-next repository following project guidelines.
Instructions
Gather Information
- If
$ARGUMENTSis provided, use it as the issue title/description - If no arguments, ask the user for:
- Issue type (bug, enhancement, feature)
- Brief description of the issue
- If
Check for Duplicates
- Search existing issues for similar topics
- If potential duplicates found, show them to the user and ask to confirm creation
Determine Issue Type and Labels
bug- Something isn't workingenhancement- Improvement to existing featurefeature- New feature requestdocumentation- Documentation improvements
Create the Issue
- Use clear, descriptive title (imperative mood: "Add...", "Fix...", "Update...")
- Structure the body with appropriate sections based on type
Issue Body Templates
Bug Report
## Description
<Clear description of the bug>
## Steps to Reproduce
1.
2.
3.
## Expected Behavior
<What should happen>
## Actual Behavior
<What actually happens>
## Environment
- OS:
- Git version:
- git-flow-next version:
Enhancement/Feature
## Description
<Clear description of the enhancement/feature>
## Motivation
<Why is this needed? What problem does it solve?>
## Proposed Solution
<How should this work?>
## Alternatives Considered
<Other approaches considered, if any>
- Report Result
- Show the created issue URL
- Suggest next step:
/analyze-issue <number>to start working on it
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review