git-safe-pr-workflow
- Repo stars 0
- Author repo skills-registry
Git Safe Pr Workflow
Overview
Guide users through a GitHub-first PR workflow that keeps main clean without requiring
frequent local rebases. Prefer short-lived feature branches, merge origin/main into the
feature branch when syncing, and land changes with Squash and merge.
Bias toward safety over elegance. Choose reversible operations, avoid rewriting shared history, and teach the user in small steps while you work.
Safe Defaults
- Treat
mainandmasteras shared, sensitive branches. - Use a short-lived feature branch for every task.
- Assume a pushed branch or open PR may already be shared.
- Prefer
git fetchbefore any sync, merge, or recovery action. - Prefer merging
origin/maininto a feature branch over rebasing it. - Prefer
git revertover rewriting history when commits may already be pushed. - Prefer
Squash and mergeto keepmainclean.
Inspect First
Before any Git operation that changes history, branches, or remote state, inspect:
- current branch and whether it is the default branch
- clean vs dirty working tree
- upstream tracking branch and whether local commits are pushed
- whether the branch has an open PR or appears shared
- staged and unstaged diff when undoing or syncing work
If you cannot determine whether a branch is shared, assume it is shared and choose the safer path.
Standard Workflow
Use this as the default GitHub workflow for low-experience users:
- Branch from
main. - Commit locally on the feature branch in small logical steps.
- Open a PR early.
- When the branch falls behind
main, mergeorigin/maininto the feature branch. - Resolve conflicts carefully and verify the final code, not just the merge markers.
- Push the updated branch.
- Merge with
Squash and merge. - Delete the feature branch after merge.
Do not teach users to routinely rebase pushed PR branches just to get the latest main.
That workflow is where many novices re-introduce old code or lose work.
Opening PRs
When helping a user open a PR, treat the PR title as the likely final squash-merge commit.
- Write the title so it reads well on
mainafterSquash and merge. - Use a concise Conventional Commit style title when the repo uses that convention.
- Describe the final outcome, not the implementation journey or review process.
- Avoid titles like
WIP,fix stuff,address comments, orupdate branch.
Good default patterns:
feat: add <skill-name> skillfeat(<skill-name>): add <capability>fix(<skill-name>): correct <problem>docs: document <policy or workflow>
For the PR body:
- briefly state what changed
- briefly state why it changed
- mention testing or validation if relevant
If the repo uses GitHub squash merges, prefer the PR title as the default squash commit message.
Sync Decision Tree
- Need the latest
mainon a feature branch? Usefetch, then mergeorigin/maininto the feature branch. - Need a clean
mainhistory? Rely onSquash and merge, not local rebasing of the feature branch. - Need to clean up unpublished local commits? Rebase is acceptable only if the branch is clearly private, unpublished, and not under review.
- Need to undo pushed work? Use
revert. - Need to discard local-only work? Use the least destructive local undo that matches the goal.
If a user asks to rebase a pushed branch, explain why that is risky and propose merging
origin/main instead.
Conflict Resolution Rules
- Resolve conflicts to the desired final code state, not by blindly taking both sides.
- Assume old bugs can be reintroduced during conflict resolution.
- After resolving conflicts, inspect the affected files and summarize what changed.
- Run targeted verification after conflicts: tests, build, or focused checks in the touched area.
- If the resolution is non-obvious, explain it briefly to the user while making the change.
For detailed conflict-handling steps and examples, read references/conflict-resolution.md.
Recovery Rules
- If a merge is in progress and the user wants to stop, abort the merge rather than improvising.
- If a rebase is in progress and has gone wrong, stop and recover with
reflogor rebase abort. - If the wrong commit was pushed, prefer
revert. - If work was committed to the wrong branch, preserve it and move it rather than deleting it.
- When recovering history, explain what reference point you are returning to and why.
For recovery playbooks, read references/recovery.md.
Refuse or Warn Hard
- Do not commit directly to
mainunless the user explicitly asks and the repo policy allows it. - Do not force-push
mainor other protected branches. - Do not rebase a pushed/shared branch by default.
- Do not use
git reset --hard,git clean -fd, branch deletion, or tag deletion unless the user clearly wants destructive cleanup. - Do not bypass branch protections, required checks, or required review flows.
If the user explicitly wants a risky operation, explain the safer alternative first. Only proceed when the request is clear and the branch is not a protected/shared branch.
Teaching Behavior
Teach in short, repeatable notes while working:
- State what you are about to do and why it is the safer path.
- When rejecting rebase, explain that rebase rewrites commit history and is easy to misuse once a branch is pushed.
- When merging
origin/main, explain that this preserves the branch's existing commits and is easier to recover from. - After recovery, explain what went wrong, how you recovered, and what safer habit to use next time.
- Avoid long Git lectures. Teach the next decision, not the whole tool.
GitHub Settings To Recommend
When asked how to support this workflow at the repo level, recommend:
- protect
main - require pull requests before merge
- require status checks
- require at least one review
- enable
Squash and merge - disable
Rebase and merge - optionally disable regular merge commits if the team wants squash-only history
- set the default squash commit message to
Pull request title - auto-delete head branches after merge
For repo policy details, read references/repo-settings.md.
Quick Checklist
Before syncing a feature branch:
- confirm you are on the feature branch, not
main - fetch remote changes
- check for uncommitted work
- merge
origin/main, do not rebase by default - inspect and verify conflict resolutions
Before pushing:
- review
statusand diff - confirm no accidental changes to unrelated files
- explain any conflict resolution that changed behavior
Before undoing:
- determine whether the commits are pushed
- choose
revertfor pushed work - use local-only undo only for unpublished work
<!-- tomevault:4.0:skill_md:2026-05-22 -->Source: caidanw/skills — distributed by TomeVault.
- Fluxly category
- Engineering
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @tomevault-io · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- Unspecified
- Runtime requirements
- Unspecified
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Detected network behavior
- External requests
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. Guide users through a GitHub-first PR workflow that keeps main clean without requiring frequent local rebases. Prefer short-lived feature branches, merge origin/main into the feature branch when syncing, and land changes with Squash and merge.
Treat main and master as shared, sensitive branches. Use a short-lived feature branch for every task. Assume a pushed branch or open PR may already be shared.
Before any Git operation that changes history, branches, or remote state, inspect: current branch and whether it is the default branch clean vs dirty working tree
Use this as the default GitHub workflow for low-experience users: Branch from main. Commit locally on the feature branch in small logical steps.
When helping a user open a PR, treat the PR title as the likely final squash-merge commit. Write the title so it reads well on main after Squash and merge. Use a concise Conventional Commit style title when the repo uses that convention.
Need the latest main on a feature branch? Use fetch, then merge origin/main into the feature branch. Need a clean main history? Rely on Squash and merge, not local rebasing of the feature
# Git Safe Pr Workflow
## Overview
Guide users through a GitHub-first PR workflow that keeps `main` clean without requiring
frequent local rebases. Prefer short-lived feature branches, merge `origin/main` into the
feature branch when syncing, and land changes with `Squash and merge`.
Bias toward safety over elegance. Choose reversible operations, avoid rewriting shared
history, and teach the user in small steps while you work.
## Safe Defaults
- Treat `main` and `master` as shared, sensitive branches.
- Use a short-lived feature branch for every task.
- Assume a pushed branch or open PR may already be shared.
- Prefer `git fetch` before any sync, merge, or recovery action.
- Prefer merging `origin/main` into a feature branch over rebasing it.
- Prefer `git revert` over rewriting history when commits may already be pushed.
- Prefer `Squash and merge` to keep `main` clean.
## Inspect First
Before any Git operation that changes history, branches, or remote state, inspect:
- current branch and whether it is the default branch
- clean vs dirty working tree
- upstream tracking branch and whether local commits are pushed
- whether the branch has an open PR or appears shared
- staged and unstaged diff when undoing or syncing work
If you cannot determine whether a branch is shared, assume it is shared and choose the
safer path.
## Standard Workflow
Use this as the default GitHub workflow for low-experience users:
1. Branch from `main`.
2. Commit locally on the feature branch in small logical steps.
3. Open a PR early.
4. When the branch falls behind `main`, merge `origin/main` into the feature branch.
5. Resolve conflicts carefully and verify the final code, not just the merge markers.
6. Push the updated branch.
7. Merge with `Squash and merge`.
… Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> Overview → Safe Defaults → Inspect First → Standard Workflow → Opening PRs → Sync Decision Tree
terms -> Need the latest main on a feature branch? · Need a clean main history? · Need to clean up unpublished local commits? · Need to undo pushed work? · Need to discard local-only work?
files/cmd -> main · origin/main · Squash and merge · master · git fetch · git revert · WIP · fix stuff
body sha256 -> 05f0ec9733b0
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review