greploop
- Repo stars 206
- Author updated Live
- Author repo skills
- Domain
- Other
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @greptileai · no license declared
- Token usage
- Heavy
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- External requests
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: greploop
description: > Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresol…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---
# greploop output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: > Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresolved comments. First check for Perforce, then fall back to git remote detection: if p4 info >/dev/null 2>&1; then REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin) if echo "$REMOTE_URL" | grep -qi "gitlab"; then makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Cursor….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “> Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresolved comments. First check for Perforce, then fall back to git remote detection: if p4 info >/dev/null 2>&1; then REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin) if echo "$REMOTE_URL" | grep -qi "gitlab"; then makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Cursor…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/api`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: greploop
description: > Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresol…
category: other
source: greptileai/skills
---
# greploop
## When to use
- > Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresolved comments. First ch…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "greploop" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | may access external network resources
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Greploop
Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresolved comments.
Inputs
- PR/MR/CL number (optional): If not provided, detect the PR/MR for the current branch, or the default pending changelist for p4.
Instructions
0. Detect platform
First check for Perforce, then fall back to git remote detection:
# Check for Perforce environment
if p4 info >/dev/null 2>&1; then
VCS="perforce"
else
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
if echo "$REMOTE_URL" | grep -qi "gitlab"; then
VCS="gitlab"
else
VCS="github"
fi
fi
For self-hosted GitLab instances whose hostname doesn't contain "gitlab", the user can override by passing --vcs gitlab as an input. For Perforce, pass --vcs perforce.
1. Identify the PR/MR/CL
GitHub:
gh pr view --json number,headRefName -q '{number: .number, branch: .headRefName}'
GitLab:
glab mr view --output json | jq '{iid: .iid, branch: .source_branch}'
Switch to the PR/MR branch if not already on it.
Perforce:
# List pending changelists for current user/client
p4 changes -s pending -u $P4USER -c $P4CLIENT
# Describe a specific CL
p4 describe -s <CL_NUMBER>
Ensure the correct workspace (p4 client) is set before proceeding.
Key field differences:
- GitHub:
number,headRefName,headRefOid - GitLab:
iid,source_branch,sha - Perforce: changelist number,
P4CLIENT, shelved files
2. Loop
Repeat the following cycle. Max 5 iterations to avoid runaway loops.
A. Trigger Greptile review
Push/shelve the latest changes (if any):
GitHub/GitLab:
git push
Perforce:
# Re-shelve to update the shelved files for review
p4 shelve -f -c <CL_NUMBER>
Wait for checks to start after push/shelve:
sleep 5
GitHub — check if Greptile is already running before posting a new trigger comment:
GREPTILE_STATE=$(gh pr checks <PR_NUMBER> --json name,state | jq -r '.[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i")) | .state')
If Greptile is not already running (PENDING or IN_PROGRESS), request a fresh review:
if [ "$GREPTILE_STATE" != "PENDING" ] && [ "$GREPTILE_STATE" != "IN_PROGRESS" ]; then
gh pr comment <PR_NUMBER> --body "@greptile review"
fi
Then poll for the Greptile check run to complete:
HEAD_SHA=$(gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)
while true; do
GREPTILE_CHECK=$(gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/$HEAD_SHA/check-runs" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i"))' 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$GREPTILE_CHECK" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile check to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
STATUS=$(echo "$GREPTILE_CHECK" | jq -r '.status // "completed"')
CONCLUSION=$(echo "$GREPTILE_CHECK" | jq -r '.conclusion // "pending"')
if [ "$STATUS" = "completed" ]; then
if [ "$CONCLUSION" = "success" ]; then
echo "Greptile check passed!"
else
echo "Greptile check completed with: $CONCLUSION"
fi
break
fi
echo "Waiting for Greptile... (status: $STATUS)"
sleep 10
done
GitLab — check if Greptile is already running before posting a trigger comment:
PIPELINES=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/pipelines")
GREPTILE_RUNNING=$(echo "$PIPELINES" | jq '[.[] | select(.status == "running" or .status == "pending")] | length')
If no pipeline is running, post a trigger comment:
if [ "$GREPTILE_RUNNING" = "0" ]; then
glab mr note <MR_IID> --message "@greptile review"
fi
Perforce — Perforce does not have native check runs. If Greptile is integrated via a webhook triggered on p4 shelve, wait for it to process. Check your Greptile installation's webhook endpoint or dashboard for the review status. Poll by re-fetching the Greptile review comment on the CL until a score appears.
Then poll for the Greptile pipeline job to complete (see GitLab API reference):
HEAD_SHA=$(glab mr view <MR_IID> --output json | jq -r '.sha')
while true; do
PIPELINES=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/pipelines")
# Find the most recent pipeline for this SHA
PIPELINE_ID=$(echo "$PIPELINES" | jq -r --arg sha "$HEAD_SHA" \
'[.[] | select(.sha == $sha)] | sort_by(.id) | last | .id // empty')
if [ -z "$PIPELINE_ID" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile pipeline to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
JOBS=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/pipelines/$PIPELINE_ID/jobs")
GREPTILE_JOB=$(echo "$JOBS" | jq '.[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i"))')
if [ -z "$GREPTILE_JOB" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile job to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
JOB_STATUS=$(echo "$GREPTILE_JOB" | jq -r '.status')
if [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "success" ] || [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "failed" ] || [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "canceled" ]; then
echo "Greptile job completed with: $JOB_STATUS"
break
fi
echo "Waiting for Greptile... (status: $JOB_STATUS)"
sleep 10
done
B. Fetch Greptile review results
Greptile may surface its score in several places — check all of the relevant sources:
GitHub:
1. PR description (body):
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json body -q '.body'
2. General PR comments (issue comments):
gh api --paginate "repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/<PR_NUMBER>/comments?per_page=100"
Filter for Greptile-authored comments and use the body from the most recently updated comment (updated_at), not the most recently created comment. Greptile may edit the same general PR comment on each review cycle; parse the current body, including the "Prompt to fix all with AI" section, before deciding there are no remaining issues.
3. PR reviews:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/reviews
Look for the most recent entry from greptile-apps[bot] or greptile-apps-staging[bot].
GitLab:
1. MR description (body):
glab mr view <MR_IID> --output json | jq -r '.description'
2. MR notes (comments):
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/notes"
Filter for notes from the Greptile bot user (check the author.username field — the exact username may vary per installation; verify on first run).
Perforce:
1. CL description:
p4 describe -s <CL_NUMBER>
Check the description field for a Greptile-appended score block.
2. CL comments / review notes: If your installation uses a review tool such as Helix Swarm, fetch comments via its API.
Example (Swarm API):
GET /api/v11/comments?topic=reviews/
Response fields of interest typically include:
- user (author username)
- body (comment text)
- flags/state indicating whether the comment is resolved
Filter to comments authored by the Greptile bot:
- Prefer exact username match if known
- Otherwise, use a heuristic where the author name contains "greptile" (case-insensitive)
For all platforms, parse the text for:
- Confidence score: a pattern like
3/5or5/5(orConfidence: 3/5). - Comment count: Number of inline review comments noted in the summary.
Use whichever source has the most recently updated score. For GitHub, prefer updated_at from issue comments when comparing an edited Greptile summary against older review entries.
Also fetch all unresolved inline comments:
GitHub:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments
Also carry forward actionable items from the latest Greptile general PR comment, especially the "Prompt to fix all with AI" section, even if the inline comment endpoint returns zero unresolved comments.
GitLab:
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions"
Filter to DiffNote type discussions (notes[0].type == "DiffNote") from Greptile that are on the latest commit and not yet resolved ("resolved": false).
Perforce: If using Swarm:
Fetch inline diff comments for the review associated with the CL
GET /api/v11/comments?topic=reviews/
Filter to comments from the Greptile bot user that have not been marked as resolved/addressed.
C. Check exit conditions
Stop the loop if any of these are true:
- Confidence score is 5/5 AND there are zero unresolved comments
- Max iterations reached (report current state)
D. Fix actionable comments
For each unresolved Greptile comment:
- Read the file and understand the comment in context.
- Determine if it's actionable (code change needed) or informational.
- If actionable, make the fix.
- If informational or a false positive, note it but still resolve the thread.
E. Resolve threads
GitHub — fetch unresolved review threads and resolve all that have been addressed (see GraphQL reference):
gh api graphql -f query='
query($cursor: String) {
repository(owner: "OWNER", name: "REPO") {
pullRequest(number: PR_NUMBER) {
reviewThreads(first: 100, after: $cursor) {
pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
nodes {
id
isResolved
comments(first: 1) {
nodes { body path author { login } }
}
}
}
}
}
}'
Resolve addressed threads:
gh api graphql -f query='
mutation {
t1: resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "ID1"}) { thread { isResolved } }
t2: resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "ID2"}) { thread { isResolved } }
}'
GitLab — fetch unresolved discussions and resolve each one (see GitLab API reference):
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions?per_page=100"
Filter for "resolved": false discussions. Then resolve each by its id:
glab api --method PUT \
"projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions/<DISCUSSION_ID>" \
--field resolved=true
Repeat for each unresolved discussion ID. (GitLab has no batch resolution — loop through each one.)
F. Commit and push / re-shelve
GitHub/GitLab:
git add -A
git commit -m "address greptile review feedback (greploop iteration N)"
git push
Perforce:
# Stage changes back into the CL and re-shelve for the next review round
p4 shelve -f -c <CL_NUMBER>
Wait for checks to start after push/shelve:
sleep 5
Then go back to step A.
3. Report
After exiting the loop, summarize:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform | GitHub / GitLab / Perforce |
| Iterations | N |
| Final confidence | X/5 |
| Comments resolved | N |
| Remaining comments | N (if any) |
If the loop exited due to max iterations, list any remaining unresolved comments and suggest next steps.
Output format
Greploop complete.
Platform: GitHub
Iterations: 2
Confidence: 5/5
Resolved: 7 comments
Remaining: 0
If not fully resolved:
Greploop stopped after 5 iterations.
Platform: GitLab
Confidence: 4/5
Resolved: 12 comments
Remaining: 2
Remaining issues:
- src/auth.ts:45 — "Consider rate limiting this endpoint"
- src/db.ts:112 — "Missing index on user_id column"
Perforce example:
Greploop complete.
Platform: Perforce
Changelist: 12345
Iterations: 3
Confidence: 5/5
Resolved: 9 comments
Remaining: 0
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review