Agent审查
- 作者仓库星标 206
- 作者更新于 实时读取
- 作者仓库 skills
- 领域
- 通用
- 兼容 Agent
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- 信任分
- 88 / 100 · 社区维护
- 作者 / 版本 / 许可
- @greptileai · 未声明 license
- Token 消耗评级
- 较高消耗
- 接入复杂程度
- 需简单配置
- 是否需要外部 API Key
- 不需要
- 兼容的系统
- 未声明(默认跨平台)
- 底层运行要求
- 无特殊要求
- 文件与系统权限
-
- 只读
- 允许写入 / 修改
- 网络行为
- 允许外网请求
- 安装命令数
- 26 条
档案由构建时根据 SKILL.md 与安装命令自动衍生,可能与作者实际意图存在差异。
需要注意: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: greploop
description: > Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresol…
category: 通用
runtime: 无特殊运行时
---
# greploop 输出预览
## PART A: 任务判断
- 适用问题:通用任务拆解、检查和交付。
- 输入要求:目标材料、限制条件、期望输出和验收方式。
- 证据边界:围绕“Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform”读取原文规则,不把推断写成作者承诺。
## PART B: 执行结果
- **01** 任务判断:确认你的需求是否属于通用任务拆解、检查和交付,并标出输入、限制和预期结果。
- **02** 执行计划:优先按“Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform”拆成步骤,说明每一步会读取什么、修改什么、产出什么。
- **03** 交付结果:给出可复制的命令、文件改动、检查清单或内容草稿,并说明如何继续迭代。
- **04** 风险边界:结合 读取文件、写入/修改文件、会按任务需要访问外部网络、通常不需要额外 API Key 给出执行前确认项。
## Running Rules
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先小样例验证,再放大到真实任务。
- 交付时同时给结果、检查口径和下一步迭代建议。 原文出现了 `/api` 这类斜杠命令;如果你的 Agent 支持命令触发,优先用命令开场,再补充目标和边界。
告诉 Agent 目标文件或材料、期望结果、不可改范围、是否允许联网或执行命令。本 Skill 的权限画像是:读取文件、写入/修改文件。
先用一个小任务确认它会围绕“Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform”工作;涉及文件或命令时,先看 diff、日志、预览或测试结果。
检查最终产物是否包含明确结果、必要证据和下一步动作;如果输出泛泛而谈,就补充输入、边界和验收标准后重跑。
---
name: greploop
description: > Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresol…
category: 通用
source: greptileai/skills
---
# greploop
## 什么时候使用
- 用于审阅代码、文档或方案并给出可执行反馈 适合处理通用任务拆解、检查、交付和复盘,核心价值是把输入、判断、执行、验证和交付边界固定下来,避免 Agent 泛泛回答。 把任务拆成可执行、可检查、可继续迭代的步骤;通常不需要额外 API K…
- 面向通用任务拆解、检查和交付,优先处理能明确输入、步骤和验收标准的工作。
## 需要提供什么
- 目标材料、目录范围、期望结果和不可改动内容。
- 是否允许联网、执行命令、读写文件或调用外部服务。
## 执行规则
- 围绕「Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform」组织步骤,不把推断写成作者事实。
- 读取文件、写入/修改文件;会按任务需要访问外部网络;通常不需要额外 API Key。
- 先跑小样例,确认结果可检查后再扩大任务范围。
## 输出要求
- 给出最终产物、关键证据、验证方式和下一步动作。
- 信息不足时标记 unknown,不编造命令、平台或依赖。 作者原文负责流程事实;仓库文件负责来源和命令;流狐只补充适用场景、限制和质量判断。
skill "greploop" {
输入层 -> 用户目标 + 目标文件 + 禁止范围 + 验收标准
上下文层 -> Inputs / Instructions / 0. Detect platform
规则层 -> SKILL.md 触发条件 / 执行顺序 / 输出格式
运行层 -> 无特殊运行时 | 读取文件、写入/修改文件 | 会按任务需要访问外部网络
安全层 -> 通常不需要额外 API Key + 小任务验证 + diff / 日志复核
输出层 -> 可复制结果 + 检查清单 + 下一步迭代
} Greploop
Iteratively fix a PR/MR/CL until Greptile gives a perfect review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresolved comments.
Inputs
- PR/MR/CL number (optional): If not provided, detect the PR/MR for the current branch, or the default pending changelist for p4.
Instructions
0. Detect platform
First check for Perforce, then fall back to git remote detection:
# Check for Perforce environment
if p4 info >/dev/null 2>&1; then
VCS="perforce"
else
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
if echo "$REMOTE_URL" | grep -qi "gitlab"; then
VCS="gitlab"
else
VCS="github"
fi
fi
For self-hosted GitLab instances whose hostname doesn't contain "gitlab", the user can override by passing --vcs gitlab as an input. For Perforce, pass --vcs perforce.
1. Identify the PR/MR/CL
GitHub:
gh pr view --json number,headRefName -q '{number: .number, branch: .headRefName}'
GitLab:
glab mr view --output json | jq '{iid: .iid, branch: .source_branch}'
Switch to the PR/MR branch if not already on it.
Perforce:
# List pending changelists for current user/client
p4 changes -s pending -u $P4USER -c $P4CLIENT
# Describe a specific CL
p4 describe -s <CL_NUMBER>
Ensure the correct workspace (p4 client) is set before proceeding.
Key field differences:
- GitHub:
number,headRefName,headRefOid - GitLab:
iid,source_branch,sha - Perforce: changelist number,
P4CLIENT, shelved files
2. Loop
Repeat the following cycle. Max 5 iterations to avoid runaway loops.
A. Trigger Greptile review
Push/shelve the latest changes (if any):
GitHub/GitLab:
git push
Perforce:
# Re-shelve to update the shelved files for review
p4 shelve -f -c <CL_NUMBER>
Wait for checks to start after push/shelve:
sleep 5
GitHub — check if Greptile is already running before posting a new trigger comment:
GREPTILE_STATE=$(gh pr checks <PR_NUMBER> --json name,state | jq -r '.[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i")) | .state')
If Greptile is not already running (PENDING or IN_PROGRESS), request a fresh review:
if [ "$GREPTILE_STATE" != "PENDING" ] && [ "$GREPTILE_STATE" != "IN_PROGRESS" ]; then
gh pr comment <PR_NUMBER> --body "@greptile review"
fi
Then poll for the Greptile check run to complete:
HEAD_SHA=$(gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)
while true; do
GREPTILE_CHECK=$(gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/$HEAD_SHA/check-runs" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i"))' 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$GREPTILE_CHECK" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile check to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
STATUS=$(echo "$GREPTILE_CHECK" | jq -r '.status // "completed"')
CONCLUSION=$(echo "$GREPTILE_CHECK" | jq -r '.conclusion // "pending"')
if [ "$STATUS" = "completed" ]; then
if [ "$CONCLUSION" = "success" ]; then
echo "Greptile check passed!"
else
echo "Greptile check completed with: $CONCLUSION"
fi
break
fi
echo "Waiting for Greptile... (status: $STATUS)"
sleep 10
done
GitLab — check if Greptile is already running before posting a trigger comment:
PIPELINES=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/pipelines")
GREPTILE_RUNNING=$(echo "$PIPELINES" | jq '[.[] | select(.status == "running" or .status == "pending")] | length')
If no pipeline is running, post a trigger comment:
if [ "$GREPTILE_RUNNING" = "0" ]; then
glab mr note <MR_IID> --message "@greptile review"
fi
Perforce — Perforce does not have native check runs. If Greptile is integrated via a webhook triggered on p4 shelve, wait for it to process. Check your Greptile installation's webhook endpoint or dashboard for the review status. Poll by re-fetching the Greptile review comment on the CL until a score appears.
Then poll for the Greptile pipeline job to complete (see GitLab API reference):
HEAD_SHA=$(glab mr view <MR_IID> --output json | jq -r '.sha')
while true; do
PIPELINES=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/pipelines")
# Find the most recent pipeline for this SHA
PIPELINE_ID=$(echo "$PIPELINES" | jq -r --arg sha "$HEAD_SHA" \
'[.[] | select(.sha == $sha)] | sort_by(.id) | last | .id // empty')
if [ -z "$PIPELINE_ID" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile pipeline to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
JOBS=$(glab api "projects/:fullpath/pipelines/$PIPELINE_ID/jobs")
GREPTILE_JOB=$(echo "$JOBS" | jq '.[] | select(.name | test("greptile"; "i"))')
if [ -z "$GREPTILE_JOB" ]; then
echo "Waiting for Greptile job to appear..."
sleep 5
continue
fi
JOB_STATUS=$(echo "$GREPTILE_JOB" | jq -r '.status')
if [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "success" ] || [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "failed" ] || [ "$JOB_STATUS" = "canceled" ]; then
echo "Greptile job completed with: $JOB_STATUS"
break
fi
echo "Waiting for Greptile... (status: $JOB_STATUS)"
sleep 10
done
B. Fetch Greptile review results
Greptile may surface its score in several places — check all of the relevant sources:
GitHub:
1. PR description (body):
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json body -q '.body'
2. General PR comments (issue comments):
gh api --paginate "repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/<PR_NUMBER>/comments?per_page=100"
Filter for Greptile-authored comments and use the body from the most recently updated comment (updated_at), not the most recently created comment. Greptile may edit the same general PR comment on each review cycle; parse the current body, including the "Prompt to fix all with AI" section, before deciding there are no remaining issues.
3. PR reviews:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/reviews
Look for the most recent entry from greptile-apps[bot] or greptile-apps-staging[bot].
GitLab:
1. MR description (body):
glab mr view <MR_IID> --output json | jq -r '.description'
2. MR notes (comments):
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/notes"
Filter for notes from the Greptile bot user (check the author.username field — the exact username may vary per installation; verify on first run).
Perforce:
1. CL description:
p4 describe -s <CL_NUMBER>
Check the description field for a Greptile-appended score block.
2. CL comments / review notes: If your installation uses a review tool such as Helix Swarm, fetch comments via its API.
Example (Swarm API):
GET /api/v11/comments?topic=reviews/
Response fields of interest typically include:
- user (author username)
- body (comment text)
- flags/state indicating whether the comment is resolved
Filter to comments authored by the Greptile bot:
- Prefer exact username match if known
- Otherwise, use a heuristic where the author name contains "greptile" (case-insensitive)
For all platforms, parse the text for:
- Confidence score: a pattern like
3/5or5/5(orConfidence: 3/5). - Comment count: Number of inline review comments noted in the summary.
Use whichever source has the most recently updated score. For GitHub, prefer updated_at from issue comments when comparing an edited Greptile summary against older review entries.
Also fetch all unresolved inline comments:
GitHub:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments
Also carry forward actionable items from the latest Greptile general PR comment, especially the "Prompt to fix all with AI" section, even if the inline comment endpoint returns zero unresolved comments.
GitLab:
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions"
Filter to DiffNote type discussions (notes[0].type == "DiffNote") from Greptile that are on the latest commit and not yet resolved ("resolved": false).
Perforce: If using Swarm:
Fetch inline diff comments for the review associated with the CL
GET /api/v11/comments?topic=reviews/
Filter to comments from the Greptile bot user that have not been marked as resolved/addressed.
C. Check exit conditions
Stop the loop if any of these are true:
- Confidence score is 5/5 AND there are zero unresolved comments
- Max iterations reached (report current state)
D. Fix actionable comments
For each unresolved Greptile comment:
- Read the file and understand the comment in context.
- Determine if it's actionable (code change needed) or informational.
- If actionable, make the fix.
- If informational or a false positive, note it but still resolve the thread.
E. Resolve threads
GitHub — fetch unresolved review threads and resolve all that have been addressed (see GraphQL reference):
gh api graphql -f query='
query($cursor: String) {
repository(owner: "OWNER", name: "REPO") {
pullRequest(number: PR_NUMBER) {
reviewThreads(first: 100, after: $cursor) {
pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
nodes {
id
isResolved
comments(first: 1) {
nodes { body path author { login } }
}
}
}
}
}
}'
Resolve addressed threads:
gh api graphql -f query='
mutation {
t1: resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "ID1"}) { thread { isResolved } }
t2: resolveReviewThread(input: {threadId: "ID2"}) { thread { isResolved } }
}'
GitLab — fetch unresolved discussions and resolve each one (see GitLab API reference):
glab api "projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions?per_page=100"
Filter for "resolved": false discussions. Then resolve each by its id:
glab api --method PUT \
"projects/:fullpath/merge_requests/<MR_IID>/discussions/<DISCUSSION_ID>" \
--field resolved=true
Repeat for each unresolved discussion ID. (GitLab has no batch resolution — loop through each one.)
F. Commit and push / re-shelve
GitHub/GitLab:
git add -A
git commit -m "address greptile review feedback (greploop iteration N)"
git push
Perforce:
# Stage changes back into the CL and re-shelve for the next review round
p4 shelve -f -c <CL_NUMBER>
Wait for checks to start after push/shelve:
sleep 5
Then go back to step A.
3. Report
After exiting the loop, summarize:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Platform | GitHub / GitLab / Perforce |
| Iterations | N |
| Final confidence | X/5 |
| Comments resolved | N |
| Remaining comments | N (if any) |
If the loop exited due to max iterations, list any remaining unresolved comments and suggest next steps.
Output format
Greploop complete.
Platform: GitHub
Iterations: 2
Confidence: 5/5
Resolved: 7 comments
Remaining: 0
If not fully resolved:
Greploop stopped after 5 iterations.
Platform: GitLab
Confidence: 4/5
Resolved: 12 comments
Remaining: 2
Remaining issues:
- src/auth.ts:45 — "Consider rate limiting this endpoint"
- src/db.ts:112 — "Missing index on user_id column"
Perforce example:
Greploop complete.
Platform: Perforce
Changelist: 12345
Iterations: 3
Confidence: 5/5
Resolved: 9 comments
Remaining: 0
先判断是否适合
作者设计意图
作者的方法与取舍
边界和复核