help
- Repo stars 330
- License MIT
- Author updated Live
- Author repo claude-skill-registry
- Domain
- Design
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 94 / 100 · audit passed
- Author / version / license
- @majiayu000 · MIT
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: help
description: Assess system state and suggest what needs attention. Use when stuck, unsure what to work on, or…
category: design
runtime: no special runtime
---
# help output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Assess system state and suggest what needs attention. Use when stuck, unsure what to work on, or need guidance. Reviews git, inbox, recent activity, suggests priorities..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “When to Activate / Process / 1. Deep Context Check” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Assess system state and suggest what needs attention. Use when stuck, unsure what to work on, or need guidance. Reviews git, inbox, recent activity, suggests priorities.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “When to Activate / Process / 1. Deep Context Check” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “When to Activate / Process / 1. Deep Context Check”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: help
description: Assess system state and suggest what needs attention. Use when stuck, unsure what to work on, or…
category: design
source: majiayu000/claude-skill-registry
---
# help
## When to use
- Assess system state and suggest what needs attention. Use when stuck, unsure what to work on, or need guidance. Review…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “When to Activate / Process / 1. Deep Context Check” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "help" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> When to Activate / Process / 1. Deep Context Check
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Help (System Assessment)
Deep assessment of workspace state. Identifies blockers, suggests priorities.
When to Activate
- User says: "help", "what should I work on?"
- When stuck or unsure
- Returning after time away
- Multiple things competing for attention
Process
1. Deep Context Check
Git status:
git status -sb
git log --oneline -5
git diff --stat
Inbox:
ls -lt inbox/session-summaries/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -5
ls inbox/ 2>/dev/null
Decisions pending:
ls decisions/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -10
Schema/summary:
cat .claude/tachikoma-summary.yaml 2>/dev/null
2. Report Findings
System Assessment (YYYY-MM-DD):
Git Status:
- Branch: [name]
- Uncommitted changes: [yes/no]
- Recent commits: [summary]
Inbox Status:
- Session summaries: [N files]
- Status: [Clean / Needs processing]
Pending Decisions:
- [N] decisions waiting for review
- [List key ones]
Tachikoma Summary:
- Last scan: [date]
- Observations: [key points]
3. Suggest Priorities
If uncommitted changes:
Priority 1: Git hygiene
- Uncommitted changes in [files]
- Review and commit before other work
If inbox has items:
Priority 1: Process inbox
- [N] session summaries from [dates]
- Run "learn" to update system
- Then "cleanup" to archive
If pending decisions:
Priority 1: Review decisions
- [N] tachikoma decisions pending
- Review and apply or reject
If everything clean:
System is healthy:
- Inbox clean
- Git clean
- No pending decisions
What do you want to work on?
4. Ask What User Wants
Based on this, what do you want to focus on?
Difference from Start/Startup
- start/startup: Quick context, begin work
- help: Deep analysis, identify problems, suggest priorities
Use help when stuck or returning after time away.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review