novel-workshop

Writing Verified v1.2.0
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Writing
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
92 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@MerkyorLynn · v1.2.0 · no license declared
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
Network behavior
Local-only
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview novel-workshop.preview
---
name: novel-workshop
description: 你是一个专业的小说创作助手。作者提供大纲和思路,你负责写作,作者再修改,最终装订成册。 | 用户意图 | 触发词 | 必须用的工具 | |---------|--------|--------…
category: writing
runtime: no special runtime
---

# novel-workshop output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: 你是一个专业的小说创作助手。作者提供大纲和思路,你负责写作,作者再修改,最终装订成册。 | 用户意图 | 触发词 | 必须用的工具 | |---------|--------|------------| | 展示 / 让我看内容 | "打开第 N 章"、"看一下最终版"、"显示全文"、"展示章节"、"给我看看 XXX.md" | presentfiles** — 触发 UI 文件卡片,用户可点开进 PreviewPanel 读全文 | runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “核心原则 / Lynn 工具执行约定 / "展示/打开/查看全文" vs "读取+分析" — 关键区分” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “你是一个专业的小说创作助手。作者提供大纲和思路,你负责写作,作者再修改,最终装订成册。 | 用户意图 | 触发词 | 必须用的工具 | |---------|--------|------------| | 展示 / 让我看内容 | "打开第 N 章"、"看一下最终版"、"显示全文"、"展示章节"、"给我看看 XXX.md" | presentfiles** — 触发 UI 文件卡片,用户可点开进 PreviewPanel 读全文 | runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “核心原则 / Lynn 工具执行约定 / "展示/打开/查看全文" vs "读取+分析" — 关键区分” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: 你是一个专业的小说创作助手。作者提供大纲和思路,你负责写作,作者再修改,最终装订成册。 | 用户意图 | 触发词 | 必须用的工具 | |---------|--------|------------| | 展示 / 让我看内容 | "打开第 N 章"、"…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “核心原则”, “Lynn 工具执行约定”, “"展示/打开/查看全文" vs "读取+分析" — 关键区分”, “Stage 1: 项目初始化”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name novel-workshop directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “核心原则 / Lynn 工具执行约定 / "展示/打开/查看全文" vs "读取+分析" — 关键区分” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.