panel-review
- Repo stars 0
- Author updated Aug 25, 2026, 07:09 AM
- Author repo skills
Panel Review
This review runs as a panel of specialists. Do NOT perform their audits yourself — each auditor applies rules that live only in its own definition, so an inline imitation misses them.
- Launch BOTH specialists over the target (Task dispatches):
subagent_type: review-panel:naming-auditor— prompt it with the target path and ask for its full naming/codename audit report.subagent_type: review-panel:todo-auditor— prompt it with the target path and ask for its full leftover-marker audit report.
- Wait for both reports.
- Merge: report every defect either auditor found, keeping each auditor's severity. Add any defect you observed yourself while merging, at your own severity.
- Fluxly category
- Engineering
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @trailofbits · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Plug-and-play
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- Unspecified
- Runtime requirements
- Unspecified
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Detected network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. # Panel Review This review runs as a panel of specialists. Do NOT perform their audits yourself — each auditor applies rules that live only in its own definition, so an inline imitation misses them. 1. Launch BOTH specialists over the target (Task dispatches): …
# Panel Review
This review runs as a panel of specialists. Do NOT perform their audits yourself — each
auditor applies rules that live only in its own definition, so an inline imitation
misses them.
1. Launch BOTH specialists over the target (Task dispatches):
- `subagent_type: review-panel:naming-auditor` — prompt it with the target path and
ask for its full naming/codename audit report.
- `subagent_type: review-panel:todo-auditor` — prompt it with the target path and
ask for its full leftover-marker audit report.
2. Wait for both reports.
3. Merge: report every defect either auditor found, keeping each auditor's severity.
Add any defect you observed yourself while merging, at your own severity. Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> no H2/H3 headings
terms -> This review runs as a panel of specialists.
files/cmd -> subagenttype: review-panel:naming-auditor · subagenttype: review-panel:todo-auditor · naming/codename
body sha256 -> d98ecf5fb743
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review