ralph
- Repo stars 23
- License MIT
- Author updated Live
- Author repo oh-my-droid
- Domain
- Productivity
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 94 / 100 · audit passed
- Author / version / license
- @MeroZemory · MIT
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Manual integration
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Docker
- Runtime requirements
- Docker
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: ralph
description: Self-referential loop until task completion with architect verification [RALPH + ULTRAWORK - ITE…
category: productivity
runtime: Docker
---
# ralph output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Self-referential loop until task completion with architect verification [RALPH + ULTRAWORK - ITERATION {{ITERATION}}/{{MAX}}] Your previous attempt did not output the completion promise. Continue working on the task. runs entirely locally; runs on Docker. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “PRD MODE (OPTIONAL) / Detecting PRD Mode / PRD Initialization Workflow” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Self-referential loop until task completion with architect verification [RALPH + ULTRAWORK - ITERATION {{ITERATION}}/{{MAX}}] Your previous attempt did not output the completion promise. Continue working on the task. runs entirely locally; runs on Docker. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “PRD MODE (OPTIONAL) / Detecting PRD Mode / PRD Initialization Workflow” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/cancel`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “PRD MODE (OPTIONAL) / Detecting PRD Mode / PRD Initialization Workflow”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: ralph
description: Self-referential loop until task completion with architect verification [RALPH + ULTRAWORK - ITE…
category: productivity
source: MeroZemory/oh-my-droid
---
# ralph
## When to use
- Self-referential loop until task completion with architect verification [RALPH + ULTRAWORK - ITERATION {{ITERATION}}/{…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “PRD MODE (OPTIONAL) / Detecting PRD Mode / PRD Initialization Workflow” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "ralph" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> PRD MODE (OPTIONAL) / Detecting PRD Mode / PRD Initialization Workflow
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> Docker | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Ralph Skill
[RALPH + ULTRAWORK - ITERATION {{ITERATION}}/{{MAX}}]
Your previous attempt did not output the completion promise. Continue working on the task.
PRD MODE (OPTIONAL)
If the user provides the --prd flag, initialize a PRD (Product Requirements Document) BEFORE starting the ralph loop.
Detecting PRD Mode
Check if {{PROMPT}} contains the flag pattern: --prd or --PRD
PRD Initialization Workflow
When --prd flag detected:
- Create PRD File Structure (
.omd/prd.jsonand.omd/progress.txt) - Parse the task (everything after
--prdflag) - Break down into user stories with this structure:
{
"project": "[Project Name]",
"branchName": "ralph/[feature-name]",
"description": "[Feature description]",
"userStories": [
{
"id": "US-001",
"title": "[Short title]",
"description": "As a [user], I want to [action] so that [benefit].",
"acceptanceCriteria": ["Criterion 1", "Typecheck passes"],
"priority": 1,
"passes": false
}
]
}
- Create progress.txt:
# Ralph Progress Log
Started: [ISO timestamp]
## Codebase Patterns
(No patterns discovered yet)
---
Guidelines for PRD creation:
- Right-sized stories: Each completable in one focused session
- Verifiable criteria: Include "Typecheck passes", "Tests pass"
- Independent stories: Minimize dependencies
- Priority order: Foundational work (DB, types) before UI
After PRD created: Proceed to normal ralph loop execution using the user stories as your task list
Example Usage
User input: --prd build a todo app with React and TypeScript
Your workflow:
- Detect
--prdflag - Extract task: "build a todo app with React and TypeScript"
- Create
.omd/prd.jsonwith user stories - Create
.omd/progress.txt - Begin ralph loop using user stories as task breakdown
ULTRAWORK MODE (AUTO-ACTIVATED)
Ralph automatically activates Ultrawork for maximum parallel execution. You MUST follow these rules:
Parallel Execution Rules
- PARALLEL: Fire independent calls simultaneously - NEVER wait sequentially
- BACKGROUND FIRST: Use Task(run_in_background=true) for long operations (10+ concurrent)
- DELEGATE: Route tasks to specialist agents immediately
Smart Model Routing (SAVE TOKENS)
| Task Complexity | Tier | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Simple lookups | LOW (haiku) | "What does this function return?", "Find where X is defined" |
| Standard work | MEDIUM (sonnet) | "Add error handling", "Implement this feature" |
| Complex analysis | HIGH (opus) | "Debug this race condition", "Refactor auth module" |
Available Agents by Tier
| Domain | LOW (Haiku) | MEDIUM (Sonnet) | HIGH (Opus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | architect-low |
architect-medium |
architect |
| Execution | executor-low |
executor |
executor-high |
| Search | explore |
explore-medium |
- |
| Research | researcher-low |
researcher |
- |
| Frontend | designer-low |
designer |
designer-high |
| Docs | writer |
- | - |
| Visual | - | vision |
- |
| Planning | - | - | planner |
| Critique | - | - | critic |
| Pre-Planning | - | - | analyst |
| Testing | - | qa-tester |
- |
| Security | security-reviewer-low |
- | security-reviewer |
| Build | build-fixer-low |
build-fixer |
- |
| TDD | tdd-guide-low |
tdd-guide |
- |
| Code Review | code-reviewer-low |
- | code-reviewer |
CRITICAL: Always pass model parameter explicitly!
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-droid:architect-low", model="claude-haiku-4-5-20251001", prompt="...")
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-droid:executor", model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", prompt="...")
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-droid:architect", model="claude-opus-4-5-20251101", prompt="...")
Background Execution Rules
Run in Background (set run_in_background: true):
- Package installation: npm install, pip install, cargo build
- Build processes: npm run build, make, tsc
- Test suites: npm test, pytest, cargo test
- Docker operations: docker build, docker pull
Run Blocking (foreground):
- Quick status checks: git status, ls, pwd
- File reads, edits
- Simple commands
COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS
Before claiming completion, you MUST:
- Verify ALL requirements from the original task are met
- Ensure no partial implementations
- Check that code compiles/runs without errors
- Verify tests pass (if applicable)
- TODO LIST: Zero pending/in_progress tasks
VERIFICATION BEFORE COMPLETION (IRON LAW)
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
Before outputting the completion promise:
Steps (MANDATORY)
- IDENTIFY: What command proves the task is complete?
- RUN: Execute verification (test, build, lint)
- READ: Check output - did it actually pass?
- ONLY THEN: Proceed to Architect verification
Red Flags (STOP and verify)
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- About to output completion without fresh evidence
- Expressing satisfaction before verification
Evidence Chain
- Fresh test run output showing pass
- Fresh build output showing success
- lsp_diagnostics showing 0 errors
- THEN Architect verification
- THEN completion promise
Skipping verification = Task NOT complete
ARCHITECT VERIFICATION (MANDATORY)
When you believe the task is complete:
First, spawn Architect to verify your work (ALWAYS pass model explicitly!):
Task(subagent_type="oh-my-droid:architect", model="claude-opus-4-5-20251101", prompt="Verify this implementation is complete: [describe what you did]")Wait for Architect's assessment
If Architect approves: Run
/cancelto cleanly exit ralph modeIf Architect finds issues: Fix them, then repeat verification
DO NOT exit without Architect verification.
ZERO TOLERANCE
- NO Scope Reduction - deliver FULL implementation
- NO Partial Completion - finish 100%
- NO Premature Stopping - ALL TODOs must be complete
- NO TEST DELETION - fix code, not tests
STATE CLEANUP ON COMPLETION
IMPORTANT: Use the cancel skill for proper state cleanup
When work is complete and Architect verification passes, run /cancel to cleanly exit ralph mode. This handles:
- Deletion of ralph state files (both local and global)
- Cleanup of linked ultrawork or ecomode state
- Proper termination of the ralph loop
This ensures clean state for future sessions without leaving stale state files behind.
INSTRUCTIONS
- Review your progress so far
- Continue from where you left off
- Use parallel execution and background tasks
- When FULLY complete AND Architect verified: Run
/cancelto cleanly exit and clean up all state files - Do not stop until the task is truly done
Original task: {{PROMPT}}
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review