Resolve Code Review

Read code review feedback on a pull request, resolve each item, reply in comment threads, and post a summary comment. Follows the PR conventions in CLAUDE.md.

Complementary skill: superpowers:receiving-code-review — use it alongside this one to ensure technical rigor when evaluating feedback.

Usage

/resolve-code-review [PR_NUMBER]

If no PR number is provided, detect from the current branch with gh pr view --json number -q .number.

Process

digraph resolve_review {
    rankdir=TB;
    fetch [label="1. Fetch PR comments" shape=box];
    read [label="2. Read & categorize each comment" shape=box];
    fix [label="3. Implement fixes" shape=box];
    reply [label="4. Reply in each comment thread" shape=box];
    summary [label="5. Post summary comment" shape=box];
    push [label="6. Push fixes" shape=box];

    fetch -> read -> fix -> reply -> summary -> push;
}

1. Fetch PR Comments

Detect the repo owner/name from the current git remote (do not hardcode).

Permission compatibility: Always run gh commands as standalone statements — never chain with && or wrap in $() variable assignments in the same Bash call. Claude Code's shell-aware permission matching evaluates each part of a chain independently, so REPO=$(gh repo view ...) && echo "$REPO" won't match a Bash(gh repo view *) permission even though the gh command itself would. Instead, run the gh command alone and capture the tool result.

gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner

Store the result as REPO for subsequent commands.

Fetch review context:

gh pr view <PR> --repo ${REPO} --comments
gh pr diff <PR> --repo ${REPO}

Fetch ALL inline comments with pagination (default per_page is 30 — PRs with many review rounds will have more):

gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.[] | {id, in_reply_to_id, line, path, body, created_at, pull_request_review_id, user: .user.login}]'

If the response has 100 items, there may be more pages. Use --paginate to get all:

gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/comments" --paginate \
  --jq '[.[] | {id, in_reply_to_id, line, path, body, created_at, pull_request_review_id, user: .user.login}]'

Find unreplied comments using two separate queries with positive-match selectors only.

zsh compatibility: Never use != in jq expressions passed via --jq — zsh interprets ! as history expansion and the command will fail. Always use positive == selectors in separate queries instead.

# Step 1: Get all original Gemini comments (not replies)
gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.in_reply_to_id == null) | select(.user.login == "gemini-code-assist[bot]") | {id, path, created_at, body_preview: (.body[0:120])}]'

# Step 2: Get IDs already replied to by dshaevel
gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.in_reply_to_id > 0) | select(.user.login == "dshaevel") | .in_reply_to_id]'

# Step 3: Compare — any ID in Step 1 not in Step 2 is unreplied

To fetch the full body of specific unreplied comments by ID:

gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/comments?per_page=100" \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.id == 12345 or .id == 67890) | {id, path, line, body}]'

Alternatively, fetch comments for the latest review specifically:

# Get the latest gemini review ID and summary
gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/reviews" \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.user.login == "gemini-code-assist[bot]")] | last | {id, body, state}'

# Fetch only that review's inline comments
REVIEW_ID=<id-from-above>
gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/reviews/${REVIEW_ID}/comments" \
  --jq '[.[] | {id, line, path, body, created_at}]'

If the review has a top-level summary comment (gemini-code-assist often posts one), read it first to understand the overall assessment.

2. Read and Categorize

For each review comment:

• Read the file and surrounding code to understand context before deciding
• Determine severity from the reviewer's language (critical, high, medium, low)
• Decide resolution: fix or decline

Rules:

• CRITICAL and HIGH: Must fix
• MEDIUM: Evaluate — fix if reasonable, decline with technical reasoning if not
• LOW: Fix if trivial, decline if YAGNI

3. Implement Fixes

For each item being fixed:

1. Read the relevant file
2. Make the change
3. Commit with a descriptive message (conventional commits format)

Group related fixes into a single commit when they address the same concern.

4. Reply to Each Comment Thread

Reply in the comment thread (not top-level). Every reply MUST:

• Start with @gemini-code-assist (required for notification)
• Explain what was fixed and how (if fixed)
• Provide technical reasoning (if declining)

gh api repos/${REPO}/pulls/<PR>/comments/<COMMENT_ID>/replies \
  -f body="@gemini-code-assist Fixed. Changed X to Y."

5. Post Summary Comment

After all items are resolved, post a top-level PR comment:

gh pr comment <PR> --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
@gemini-code-assist Review addressed:

| # | Feedback | Resolution |
|---|----------|------------|
| 1 | Issue X | Fixed in <commit> - Description of fix |
| 2 | Issue Y | Declined - Technical reasoning |
EOF
)"

Resolution column format: Include both the commit reference AND a brief summary.

6. Push

Push fixes to the PR branch so the reviewer can verify.

git push

Source: davidshaevel-dot-com/davidshaevel-marketplace — distributed by TomeVault.