Skill Evals

Engineering Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Engineering · meta
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@aaronjmars · no license declared
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
Linux
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Output preview skill-evals.preview
---
name: Skill Evals
description: Validate skill outputs against assertions, diff vs prior eval to flag regressions, file issues f…
category: engineering
runtime: no special runtime
---

# Skill Evals output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Validate skill outputs against assertions, diff vs prior eval to flag regressions, file issues for new failures, and queue concrete fixes <!-- autoresearch: variation B — verdict + action queue + diff vs prior + issue filing + notify gating --> Today is ${today}. Read memory/MEMORY.md for context. makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Curs….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Steps / 1. Load inputs / 2. Run coverage audit (delegated)” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Validate skill outputs against assertions, diff vs prior eval to flag regressions, file issues for new failures, and queue concrete fixes <!-- autoresearch: variation B — verdict + action queue + diff vs prior + issue filing + notify gating --> Today is ${today}. Read memory/MEMORY.md for context. makes outbound network calls. Works with Claude Code, Curs…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Steps / 1. Load inputs / 2. Run coverage audit (delegated)” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Validate skill outputs against assertions, diff vs prior eval to flag regressions, file issues for new failures, and queue concr…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Steps”, “1. Load inputs”, “2. Run coverage audit (delegated)”, “3. Determine eval scope”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name Skill Evals directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Steps / 1. Load inputs / 2. Run coverage audit (delegated)” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.