Skill Security Scan

Security Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Security · dev
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@aaronjmars · no license declared
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Not required
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Shell exec
  • Env read
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Output preview skill-security-scan.preview
---
name: Skill Security Scan
description: Audit skills, workflows, and companion scripts for injection, exfiltration, traversal, and promp…
category: security
runtime: no special runtime
---

# Skill Security Scan output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Audit skills, workflows, and companion scripts for injection, exfiltration, traversal, and prompt-override risks with delta tracking, baseline suppression, issue filing, and per-finding remediation <!-- autoresearch: variation B — sharper output: delta tracking + issue filing + code-fence-aware suppression + baseline + remediation snippets + expanded cove….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Threat categories / Coverage / Inputs and state” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Audit skills, workflows, and companion scripts for injection, exfiltration, traversal, and prompt-override risks with delta tracking, baseline suppression, issue filing, and per-finding remediation <!-- autoresearch: variation B — sharper output: delta tracking + issue filing + code-fence-aware suppression + baseline + remediation snippets + expanded cove…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Threat categories / Coverage / Inputs and state” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands, read environment variables; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Audit skills, workflows, and companion scripts for injection, exfiltration, traversal, and prompt-override risks with delta trac…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Threat categories”, “Coverage”, “Inputs and state”, “Baseline file format”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name Skill Security Scan directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Threat categories / Coverage / Inputs and state” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: It usually needs no extra API key, so start with a small validation task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / shell-exec / env-read; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.