skill-leaderboard

Other Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Other · meta
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@aaronjmars · no license declared
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Required · GitHub
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
No special requirements
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
  • Env read
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Output preview skill-leaderboard.preview
---
name: skill-leaderboard
description: Weekly ranking of which skills are most popular across CONFIGURED Aeon forks (excludes untouched…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---

# skill-leaderboard output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Weekly ranking of which skills are most popular across CONFIGURED Aeon forks (excludes untouched templates) <!-- autoresearch: variation B — sharper output via configured-fork denominator + tiered fleet + promote/match/sunset insights --> Today is ${today}. Generate a weekly leaderboard of which Aeon skills the configured fleet is actually running — and w….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Why this version / Steps / 1. Determine the target repo” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Weekly ranking of which skills are most popular across CONFIGURED Aeon forks (excludes untouched templates) <!-- autoresearch: variation B — sharper output via configured-fork denominator + tiered fleet + promote/match/sunset insights --> Today is ${today}. Generate a weekly leaderboard of which Aeon skills the configured fleet is actually running — and w…”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Why this version / Steps / 1. Determine the target repo” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, read environment variables; may access external network resources; requires GitHub API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, read environment variables; may access external network resources; requires GitHub API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Weekly ranking of which skills are most popular across CONFIGURED Aeon forks (excludes untouched templates) <!-- autoresearch: v…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Why this version”, “Steps”, “1. Determine the target repo”, “2. Snapshot upstream defaults”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name skill-leaderboard directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Why this version / Steps / 1. Determine the target repo” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare GitHub API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write / env-read; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.