Skill Repair
- Repo stars 430
- Author updated Live
- Author repo aeon
- Domain
- Other · meta · dev
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 94 / 100 · audit passed
- Author / version / license
- @aaronjmars · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- External requests
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
---
name: Skill Repair
description: Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically — systemic-first triage, per-category…
category: other
runtime: no special runtime
---
# Skill Repair output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically — systemic-first triage, per-category playbooks, verification plan <!-- autoresearch: variation D — systemic-first triage + per-category playbooks + verification (folds A's regression hunter, B's structured PR + risk class + verdict, C's exit taxonomy + preflight + cooldown) --> Today is ${today}. ….
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Phases / Exit taxonomy / 1. PREFLIGHT” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically — systemic-first triage, per-category playbooks, verification plan <!-- autoresearch: variation D — systemic-first triage + per-category playbooks + verification (folds A's regression hunter, B's structured PR + risk class + verdict, C's exit taxonomy + preflight + cooldown) --> Today is ${today}. …”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Phases / Exit taxonomy / 1. PREFLIGHT” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source does not require a stable slash command. After installation, invoke the skill by name and describe the task.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Phases / Exit taxonomy / 1. PREFLIGHT”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: Skill Repair
description: Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically — systemic-first triage, per-category…
category: other
source: aaronjmars/aeon
---
# Skill Repair
## When to use
- Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically — systemic-first triage, per-category playbooks, verificatio…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Phases / Exit taxonomy / 1. PREFLIGHT” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; may access external network resources; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "Skill Repair" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Phases / Exit taxonomy / 1. PREFLIGHT
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | may access external network resources
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} ${var} — Skill name to repair. If empty, runs systemic triage and picks the worst fixable target.
${var}modifiers: prefixdry-run:to diagnose only without writing a PR (e.g.dry-run:digest).
Today is ${today}. Your task is to diagnose and repair the worst-impact failing or degraded skill — preferring a single shared fix over N per-skill patches when failures cluster.
Phases
PREFLIGHT → TRIAGE → DIAGNOSE → REPAIR → VERIFY → LOG
Stop early at the appropriate exit code if any phase finds nothing actionable.
Exit taxonomy
Pick exactly one before notifying.
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
REPAIR_OK_FIXED |
Per-skill fix applied, PR opened |
REPAIR_OK_SYSTEMIC |
Shared root cause across N skills — single shared fix or shared issue filed |
REPAIR_DIAGNOSED_NO_FIX |
Root cause known but requires operator action (e.g. missing secret, upstream API down). Issue updated, no PR |
REPAIR_NO_TARGETS |
All tracked skills healthy and no open fixable issues |
REPAIR_DRY_RUN |
var=dry-run:NAME — diagnostic only, no PR |
REPAIR_BLOCKED |
Preflight failed (gh auth, missing files) or cooldown active |
1. PREFLIGHT
Bail early with REPAIR_BLOCKED (and notify with the reason) if any of these fails:
gh auth statussucceeds.memory/cron-state.jsonexists and parses as JSON.memory/issues/INDEX.mdexists. If absent, bootstrap a minimal one (Open + Resolved tables, no rows).memory/state/skill-repair-history.jsonexists. If absent, create{}.
Cooldown / idempotency (skip target with REPAIR_BLOCKED if any matches; don't loop on a fix that didn't take):
- The chosen target appears in
memory/state/skill-repair-history.jsonwithlast_repair_atwithin 24h. (Operator can override by deleting the entry.) - An open PR already exists matching
fix/skill-repair-{name}-*—gh pr list --state open --search "head:fix/skill-repair-{name}". - More than 3 skill-repair PRs already opened in the current UTC day — rate-limit our own PRs.
If ${var} starts with dry-run:, strip the prefix to get the target name and skip the cooldown.
2. TRIAGE
Identify the target. Two paths:
Path A — ${var} set explicitly: repair that skill. Skip step 2's clustering.
Path B — ${var} empty (auto-select):
- Read
memory/issues/INDEX.md. Extract open issues. Skippermanent-limitation. - Read
memory/cron-state.json. Compute candidates where any of:consecutive_failures >= 2, ORsuccess_rate < 0.5ANDtotal_runs >= 3, ORlast_status == "failed"ANDlast_failedwithin 48h, ORlast_quality_score <= 2(degraded output even when "successful").
- Cluster by error signature. Group candidates by normalized
last_error(lowercase, strip timestamps/ids/digits) AND by issuecategory. If 2+ skills share a signature OR a non-trivial category (api-change,rate-limit,missing-secret,sandbox-limitation):- This is systemic. Switch to systemic mode:
- File or update a single shared issue (
affected_skills: [list]) instead of N per-skill issues. - If the shared root cause is fixable in one place (e.g., a shared script under
scripts/, a CLAUDE.md pattern, a shared config), open one PR addressing that. Otherwise emitREPAIR_DIAGNOSED_NO_FIXwith the systemic finding. - Exit with
REPAIR_OK_SYSTEMICafter step 5.
- File or update a single shared issue (
- This is systemic. Switch to systemic mode:
- Pick worst single target. Sort: critical issue > high issue > consecutive_failures desc > lowest success_rate > stalest
last_success. Skippermanent-limitationand any target whose preflight cooldown blocks it. If nothing remains:REPAIR_NO_TARGETS.
3. DIAGNOSE
Build a diagnostic dossier for the target before touching any file. Sources are independent — each one's status feeds the source-status footer (ok/empty/fail).
a. Skill file: read skills/{name}/SKILL.md. Note frontmatter, declared data sources, env-var references.
b. Cron-state entry: extract last_error, last_failed, last_success, success_rate, consecutive_failures, last_quality_score.
c. Regression hunter: if last_success exists, run
git log --oneline --since="$LAST_SUCCESS" -- skills/{name}/SKILL.md aeon.yml scripts/
Any commit listed is a candidate regression source. If exactly one commit touched the skill file in this window, it is the prime suspect — record its SHA + subject in the dossier.
d. Recent failed runs (last 5, not just 1):
gh run list --workflow=aeon.yml --limit 50 --json databaseId,name,conclusion,createdAt \
| jq -r '[.[] | select(.name | contains("{name}")) | select(.conclusion=="failure")] | .[0:5]'
For each, prefer gh run view "$RUN_ID" --log-failed (already filtered to failed steps) over the full log; fall back to gh run view "$RUN_ID" --log only if --log-failed returns nothing. Then:
gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/$RUN_ID/check-runs" \
| jq -r '.check_runs[].output.annotations[]? | "\(.path):\(.start_line) \(.annotation_level): \(.message)"'
Annotations give clean error rows; logs give context. Distinguish consistent (same signature 4-5/5 runs → likely deterministic bug, secret, API change) from intermittent (1-2/5 → rate limit, flaky upstream).
e. Logs: search last 3 days of memory/logs/*.md for {name} mentions. Surface any prior diagnoses.
f. Quality history: if memory/skill-health/{name}.json exists, note avg_score trend.
g. Output expectations: if skills/skill-evals/evals.json has an entry for {name}, extract its min_words, required_patterns, forbidden_patterns. A passing run that fails these is quality-regression.
h. Issue: if memory/issues/INDEX.md lists an open issue for this skill, read the file — its category and root_cause short-circuit the playbook lookup below.
4. REPAIR — per-category playbook
Categories follow CLAUDE.md. Pick the most specific category that fits the diagnostic dossier (issue category if present > error-signature pattern match > best inference). Apply the matching playbook.
| Category | Playbook |
|---|---|
api-change |
WebFetch the live API spec / status page / release notes. Update endpoints, payload shape, headers, error codes in the skill. Cite the spec URL in the PR body. Never guess — if WebFetch fails, drop to REPAIR_DIAGNOSED_NO_FIX. |
rate-limit |
Add backoff (sleep), reduce request count, or add a fallback endpoint. Never raise the limit from the skill side. If the skill's schedule is too aggressive, propose a less-frequent cron in the PR body but don't edit aeon.yml unless the issue file already authorizes it. |
timeout |
Split work into stages, add early-return on partial success, downgrade model: to claude-sonnet-4-6 or claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 for the skill that doesn't need Opus. |
sandbox-limitation |
Convert auth-required curls to the prefetch (scripts/prefetch-{name}.sh) or postprocess (.pending-{name}/ + scripts/postprocess-{name}.sh) pattern from CLAUDE.md. Add a "Sandbox note" section to the skill. |
prompt-bug |
Minimum-edit specificity insertion. Don't rewrite — add the missing constraint, a forbidden phrase, a required output structure, or a clarifying example. Diff should be < 30 added/removed lines. |
output-format / quality-regression |
Cross-reference skills/skill-evals/evals.json for the failing assertion. Edit the skill so the next run satisfies that exact pattern. Cite the assertion in the PR body. |
missing-secret |
Do not modify aeon.yml or the workflow. File or update the issue with status: open, category: missing-secret, naming the secret. Notify operator with the env-var name. Exit REPAIR_DIAGNOSED_NO_FIX. |
config |
Reversible aeon.yml edits only — schedule, var, model, enabled: false. Never add or remove top-level structure or chains. Keep diff < 5 lines in aeon.yml. |
permanent-limitation |
Skip — should not have reached repair. Update issue, exit REPAIR_DIAGNOSED_NO_FIX. |
unknown |
Do not edit blindly. Append the full diagnostic dossier (regression candidates, top error lines, source-status) to the issue file as a ## Diagnosis Notes section, exit REPAIR_DIAGNOSED_NO_FIX. Operator triages. |
Risk classification (pick one, gate the PR):
- LOW — clarifying prompt, adding fallback, comment-only changes, single-section edit (< 30 lines diff).
- MED — changes a data source, adds a new env-var reference (must already be in workflow), or modifies output format.
- HIGH — touches
aeon.yml, removes existing features, disables a skill, modifies ascripts/*.shfile. HIGH risk PRs must add the labelmanual-reviewand must NOT be auto-mergeable (skipauto-merge-friendly framing in the PR body).
Frontmatter integrity check: after editing skills/{name}/SKILL.md, re-read it. Confirm the YAML frontmatter still has name, description, var, tags. If broken, abort the edit and exit REPAIR_BLOCKED.
5. VERIFY — append a verification plan to the PR
Every PR (except REPAIR_DIAGNOSED_NO_FIX) must include a Verification section the operator can execute. Use this template:
## Verification
**Manual trigger:** [Run skill](https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/actions/workflows/aeon.yml) with `skill={name}` and `var={var}`.
**Expected result:**
- Workflow conclusion: `success`
- Output file matches `{evals.json output_pattern or "memory/logs/${today}.md mentions {name}"}`
- {category-specific signal — e.g. "no `rate limit` strings in run logs" / "produces ≥ {min_words} words" / "annotation count ≤ 0"}
**If still failing after this PR:** delete `memory/state/skill-repair-history.json[{name}]` to remove the cooldown, then re-dispatch `skill-repair` with `var={name}` for a second pass.
Record the chosen verification command in the issue file's ## Repair Attempt section so the next skill-repair run can read prior outcomes.
6. Branch, commit, PR
TODAY="${today}"
BRANCH="fix/skill-repair-{name}-${TODAY}"
git checkout -b "$BRANCH"
git add skills/{name}/SKILL.md # plus aeon.yml or scripts/* iff in playbook
git commit -m "fix({name}): [one-line root cause → fix]"
git push -u origin "$BRANCH"
gh pr create --title "fix({name}): [short]" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Symptom
[what failed — error signature, run URL]
## Diagnosis
[dossier summary: regression commit if any, consistent vs intermittent, category]
## Root cause
[one paragraph]
## Fix
[what changed and why]
## Risk
LOW | MED | HIGH — [rationale]
## Verification
[copy from step 5]
## Source status
cron_state=ok | issues_index=ok | gh_runs=ok | gh_logs=ok | git_log=ok | check_runs=ok
EOF
)"
If risk is HIGH, also: gh pr edit "$PR_URL" --add-label manual-review.
7. Update issue tracker (memory/issues/)
- If an open issue for this skill exists:
- Fix applied → set
status: resolved,resolved_at: ${today},fix_pr: <url>. Move row from Open → Resolved inINDEX.md. - No fix possible → append
## Repair Attempt — ${today}with the dossier and reason.
- Fix applied → set
- If no issue exists but a real problem was found and fixed → create
memory/issues/ISS-{NNN}.mdwith status alreadyresolved(NNN = next free number from INDEX.md). - If systemic clustering fired in step 2 → ensure
affected_skills:lists every skill matched by the signature.
8. Persist cooldown
Update memory/state/skill-repair-history.json:
{
"{name}": {
"last_repair_at": "${today}T...Z",
"exit_code": "REPAIR_OK_FIXED",
"fix_pr": "https://github.com/.../pull/N",
"issue": "ISS-NNN"
}
}
9. Notify
Send via ./notify (one-paragraph max — verdict line first):
*skill-repair — {EXIT_CODE}*
Target: {name} (or systemic: skill-a, skill-b, ...)
Root cause: [one line]
Fix: [one line] (risk: LOW|MED|HIGH)
PR: {url} Issue: {ISS-NNN}
Verify: workflow_dispatch skill={name}
10. Log
Append to memory/logs/${today}.md:
### skill-repair
- Exit: {EXIT_CODE}
- Target: {name} (or systemic group)
- Category: {category}
- Diagnosis: [root cause]
- Fix: [what changed] (risk: {LOW|MED|HIGH})
- Regression suspect: {commit SHA or "none in window"}
- Failures observed: {N}/5 recent runs ({consistent|intermittent})
- PR: {url or "—"}
- Issue: {ISS-NNN created|updated|resolved or "—"}
- Source status: cron_state | issues_index | gh_runs | gh_logs | git_log | check_runs
Sandbox note
gh and git work inside the sandbox. The diagnostic curls go through gh api (auth handled). For any external API spec lookup in the api-change playbook, prefer WebFetch over curl — see CLAUDE.md.
Constraints
- One target per run (or one systemic cluster). Never bundle unrelated repairs.
- Minimum-edit principle: keep diffs as small as possible. The original failure mode is rarely "the skill needs a rewrite".
- Never modify secrets, the workflow file (
.github/workflows/aeon.yml), ormessages.yml. - Never push to
main. Always branch + PR. - Never auto-merge HIGH-risk PRs. They carry the
manual-reviewlabel. - If a skill has been failing > 7 days with no clear root cause and the category is
unknown, recommend (in the issue and notify)enabled: falseinaeon.yml— but do not apply that change without an explicit operator-approved issue. - Skip when
${var}matches a skill that has been repaired in the last 24h unless operator clears the cooldown entry. This prevents repair loops on fixes that didn't take.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review