skill-security-auditor

Security Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
Security
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@eigent-ai · Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Manual integration
External API key
Required · Vendor-specific
Operating systems
macOS · Linux · Windows
Runtime requirements
Node.js · Python
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Shell exec
  • Env read
  • Write / modify
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview skill-security-auditor-eigent-ai.preview
---
name: skill-security-auditor
description: Security auditing for code, configs, and infrastructure. Use when the user wants to audit or imp…
category: security
runtime: Node.js / Python
---

# skill-security-auditor output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Security auditing for code, configs, and infrastructure. Use when the user wants to audit or improve security: scan for vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, command injection, path traversal), detect hardcoded secrets and credentials, review auth and authorization, check dependencies for known CVEs, audit config files for insecure defaults, or generate security reports. Trigger on \"security audit\", \"vulnerability scan\", \"code review for security\", \"find secrets\", \"check for vulnerabilities\", \"OWASP\", \"CVE\", or questions about code security..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Overview / Quick Start / Testing the scripts” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Security auditing for code, configs, and infrastructure. Use when the user wants to audit or improve security: scan for vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, command injection, path traversal), detect hardcoded secrets and credentials, review auth and authorization, check dependencies for known CVEs, audit config files for insecure defaults, or generate security reports. Trigger on \"security audit\", \"vulnerability scan\", \"code review for security\", \"find secrets\", \"check for vulnerabilities\", \"OWASP\", \"CVE\", or questions about code security.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Overview / Quick Start / Testing the scripts” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, run shell commands, read environment variables, write/modify files; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, run shell commands, read environment variables, write/modify files; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: Security auditing for code, configs, and infrastructure. Use when the user wants to audit or improve security: scan for vulnerab…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “Overview”, “Quick Start”, “Testing the scripts”, “Audit Workflow”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name skill-security-auditor directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “Overview / Quick Start / Testing the scripts” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare Vendor-specific API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / shell-exec / env-read / write; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.