skill-reviser
- Repo stars 435
- Author updated Live
- Author repo nvim
- Domain
- AI
- Compatible agents
-
- Claude Code
- Cursor
- Cline
- Codex
- Windsurf
- Gemini CLI
- +20
- Trust score
- 88 / 100 · community maintained
- Author / version / license
- @benbrastmckie · no license declared
- Token usage
- Lean
- Setup complexity
- Guided setup
- External API key
- Not required
- Operating systems
- Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
- Runtime requirements
- No special requirements
- Permissions
-
- Read-only
- Write / modify
- Shell exec
- Network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- 26 variants
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
---
name: skill-reviser
description: Thin wrapper that delegates plan revision to reviser-agent subagent. Invoke for /revise command.…
category: ai
runtime: no special runtime
---
# skill-reviser output preview
## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: Thin wrapper that delegates plan revision to reviser-agent subagent. Invoke for /revise command. this skill handles all postflight operations (status update, artifact linking, git commit) before returning. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow” and do not present inference as author intent.
## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “Thin wrapper that delegates plan revision to reviser-agent subagent. Invoke for /revise command. this skill handles all postflight operations (status update, artifact linking, git commit) before returning. runs entirely locally. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options. The source mentions slash commands such as `/revise`, `/plan`; use them first when your agent supports command triggers.
Name target files or source material, expected output, forbidden changes, and whether network or shell access is allowed. Permission fingerprint: read files, write/modify files, run shell commands.
Start with a small task and check whether the result follows “Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow”. Inspect diffs, logs, previews, or tests before expanding scope.
Confirm the final output includes a concrete result, evidence, and next action. If it stays generic, tighten inputs, boundaries, and acceptance criteria.
---
name: skill-reviser
description: Thin wrapper that delegates plan revision to reviser-agent subagent. Invoke for /revise command.…
category: ai
source: benbrastmckie/nvim
---
# skill-reviser
## When to use
- Thin wrapper that delegates plan revision to reviser-agent subagent. Invoke for /revise command. this skill handles al…
- Use it when the task has clear inputs, repeatable steps, and validation criteria.
## What to provide
- Target material, scope, expected result, and forbidden changes.
- Whether network, commands, file writes, or external services are allowed.
## Execution rules
- Organize steps around “Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow” and keep inference separate from source facts.
- read files, write/modify files, run shell commands; mostly runs locally; usually needs no extra API key.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding the task.
## Output requirements
- Return the deliverable, key evidence, validation method, and next action.
- Mark missing information as unknown; do not invent commands, platforms, or dependencies. The author source anchors workflow facts; repository files anchor sources and commands; Fluxly only adds fit, limitations, and quality judgment.
skill "skill-reviser" {
input -> user goal + target files + boundaries + acceptance criteria
context -> Context References / Trigger Conditions / Execution Flow
rules -> SKILL.md triggers / order / output contract
runtime -> no special runtime | read files, write/modify files, run shell commands | mostly runs locally
guardrails -> usually needs no extra API key + small-sample validation + diff/log review
output -> copyable result + checklist + next iteration
} Reviser Skill
Thin wrapper that delegates plan revision to reviser-agent subagent.
IMPORTANT: This skill implements the skill-internal postflight pattern. After the subagent returns, this skill handles all postflight operations (status update, artifact linking, git commit) before returning. This eliminates the "continue" prompt issue between skill return and orchestrator.
Context References
Reference (do not load eagerly):
- Path:
.claude/context/formats/return-metadata-file.md- Metadata file schema - Path:
.claude/context/patterns/postflight-control.md- Marker file protocol - Path:
.claude/context/patterns/file-metadata-exchange.md- File I/O helpers - Path:
.claude/context/patterns/jq-escaping-workarounds.md- jq escaping patterns (Issue #1132) - Path:
.claude/context/formats/plan-format.md- Plan file format specification
Note: This skill is a thin wrapper with internal postflight. Context is loaded by the delegated agent.
Trigger Conditions
This skill activates when:
/revisecommand is invoked- Task exists in state.json
Execution Flow
Stage 1: Input Validation
Validate required inputs:
task_number- Must be provided and exist in state.json
# Lookup task
task_data=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)' \
specs/state.json)
# Validate exists
if [ -z "$task_data" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number not found"
fi
# Extract fields
task_type=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.task_type // "general"')
status=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.status')
project_name=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.project_name')
description=$(echo "$task_data" | jq -r '.description // ""')
No status-based ABORT rules. The skill works regardless of task status. Routing is determined by plan file existence, not status.
Stage 2: Preflight
No intermediate "revising" status is needed for revision. The task transitions directly to "planned" on success (via postflight). Skip preflight status update.
Rationale: Unlike /plan which sets "planning" as an intermediate status, /revise is lightweight enough that an intermediate status adds no value. The postflight script handles the final status update.
Stage 3: Create Postflight Marker
Create the marker file to prevent premature termination:
# Ensure task directory exists
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
mkdir -p "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}"
cat > "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-pending" << EOF
{
"session_id": "${session_id}",
"skill": "skill-reviser",
"task_number": ${task_number},
"operation": "revise",
"reason": "Postflight pending: status update, artifact linking, git commit",
"created": "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)",
"stop_hook_active": false
}
EOF
Stage 3a: Calculate Artifact Number
Read next_artifact_number from state.json and use (current-1) since revised plan stays in the same round:
# Read next_artifact_number from state.json
next_num=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num) | .next_artifact_number // 1' \
specs/state.json)
# Plan uses (current - 1) to stay in the same round as research
# If next_artifact_number is 1 (no research yet), use 1
if [ "$next_num" -le 1 ]; then
artifact_number=1
else
artifact_number=$((next_num - 1))
fi
# Fallback for legacy tasks: count existing plan artifacts
if [ "$next_num" = "null" ] || [ -z "$next_num" ]; then
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
count=$(ls "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/plans/"*[0-9][0-9]*.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
artifact_number=$((count + 1))
fi
artifact_padded=$(printf "%02d" "$artifact_number")
Note: Revised plan does NOT increment next_artifact_number. Only research advances the sequence.
Stage 4: Research Discovery
Discover existing plan and new research reports:
4a. Find existing plan:
padded_num=$(printf "%03d" "$task_number")
plan_dir="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/plans"
existing_plan=$(ls -1t "$plan_dir"/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
4b. Find new research reports:
Use BOTH reports_integrated from state.json and file modification time comparison:
reports_dir="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/reports"
new_reports=()
if [ -n "$existing_plan" ]; then
plan_mtime=$(stat -c %Y "$existing_plan")
# Check reports_integrated from state.json (primary)
integrated=$(jq -r --argjson num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num) | .plan_metadata.reports_integrated // [] | .[]' \
specs/state.json 2>/dev/null)
for report in "$reports_dir"/*.md; do
if [ -f "$report" ]; then
report_basename=$(basename "$report")
# Check if already integrated
if echo "$integrated" | grep -qF "$report_basename"; then
continue
fi
# Fallback: check modification time
report_mtime=$(stat -c %Y "$report")
if [ "$report_mtime" -gt "$plan_mtime" ]; then
new_reports+=("$report")
fi
fi
done
else
# No plan exists -- all reports are "new"
for report in "$reports_dir"/*.md; do
if [ -f "$report" ]; then
new_reports+=("$report")
fi
done
fi
Stage 4b: Read and Inject Format Specification
Read the plan format file and prepare it for injection into the subagent prompt. This ensures the subagent always has the full format specification in its context.
format_content=$(cat .claude/context/formats/plan-format.md)
The format content will be included as a delimited section in the Stage 5 prompt.
Stage 5: Prepare Delegation Context and Invoke Subagent
CRITICAL: You MUST use the Agent tool to spawn the subagent.
Prepare delegation context:
{
"session_id": "sess_{timestamp}_{random}",
"delegation_depth": 1,
"delegation_path": ["orchestrator", "revise", "skill-reviser"],
"timeout": 1800,
"task_context": {
"task_number": N,
"task_name": "{project_name}",
"description": "{description}",
"task_type": "{task_type}"
},
"artifact_number": "{artifact_padded from Stage 3a}",
"existing_plan_path": "{path to existing plan or null}",
"new_research_paths": ["{path to report1}", "{path to report2}"],
"revision_reason": "{optional user reason}",
"roadmap_path": "specs/ROADMAP.md",
"metadata_file_path": "specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json"
}
Required Tool Invocation:
Tool: Agent (NOT Skill, NOT Plan)
Parameters:
- subagent_type: "reviser-agent"
- prompt: [Include task_context, delegation_context, existing_plan_path, new_research_paths,
revision_reason, metadata_file_path,
AND the format specification from Stage 4b as shown below]
- description: "Execute plan revision for task {N}"
Format Injection: Include the format specification from Stage 4b in the prompt as a clearly-delimited section:
<artifact-format-specification>
## CRITICAL: Plan Format Requirements
You MUST follow this format specification exactly when writing the plan artifact.
Non-compliance will be caught by postflight validation.
{format_content from Stage 4b}
</artifact-format-specification>
Place this section AFTER the delegation context JSON and BEFORE any other instructions.
DO NOT use Skill(reviser-agent) - this will FAIL.
The subagent will:
- Load revision context files
- Determine revision mode (plan revision or description update)
- Load existing plan and new research reports
- Synthesize revised plan or update description
- Write metadata to
specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/.return-meta.json - Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON)
Stage 5b: Self-Execution Fallback
CRITICAL: If you performed the work above WITHOUT using the Agent tool (i.e., you read files,
wrote artifacts, or updated metadata directly instead of spawning a subagent), you MUST write a
.return-meta.json file now before proceeding to postflight. Use the schema from
return-metadata-file.md with the appropriate status value for this operation.
If you DID use the Agent tool, skip this stage -- the subagent already wrote the metadata.
Postflight (ALWAYS EXECUTE)
The following stages MUST execute after work is complete, whether the work was done by a subagent or inline (Stage 5b). Do NOT skip these stages for any reason.
Stage 6: Read Metadata File
Read the metadata file:
metadata_file="specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.return-meta.json"
if [ -f "$metadata_file" ] && jq empty "$metadata_file" 2>/dev/null; then
status=$(jq -r '.status' "$metadata_file")
artifact_path=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].path // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_type=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].type // ""' "$metadata_file")
artifact_summary=$(jq -r '.artifacts[0].summary // ""' "$metadata_file")
new_description=$(jq -r '.metadata.new_description // ""' "$metadata_file")
else
echo "Error: Invalid or missing metadata file"
status="failed"
fi
Stage 6a: Validate Artifact Content
If subagent status is "planned" and artifact_path is non-empty, validate the plan artifact against format requirements. This is non-blocking -- warnings are logged but do not prevent postflight from completing.
if [ "$status" = "planned" ] && [ -n "$artifact_path" ] && [ -f "$artifact_path" ]; then
echo "Validating plan artifact..."
if ! bash .claude/scripts/validate-artifact.sh "$artifact_path" plan --fix; then
echo "WARNING: Plan artifact has format issues (non-blocking). Review output above."
fi
fi
Stage 7: Postflight Status Update
For Plan Revision (status == "planned"):
Update task status to "planned" using the centralized script:
bash .claude/scripts/update-task-status.sh postflight $task_number plan $session_id
If the script exits non-zero, log error but continue (status update is best-effort for revise).
For Description Update (status == "description_updated"):
Update state.json description and TODO.md directly:
jq --arg ts "$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" --arg desc "$new_description" \
--argjson num "$task_number" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)) |= . + {
description: $desc,
last_updated: $ts
}' specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && \
mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
Then use Edit tool to update the description in TODO.md.
On partial/failed: Keep status unchanged (do not call the script).
Stage 8: Artifact Linking (Plan Revision Only)
Add the new plan artifact to state.json.
IMPORTANT: Use two-step jq pattern to avoid Issue #1132 escaping bug. See jq-escaping-workarounds.md.
if [ -n "$artifact_path" ]; then
# Step 1: Filter out existing plan artifacts (use "| not" pattern to avoid != escaping - Issue #1132)
jq --argjson num "$task_number" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)).artifacts =
[(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)).artifacts // [] | .[] | select(.type == "plan" | not)]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
# Step 2: Add new plan artifact
jq --argjson num "$task_number" \
--arg path "$artifact_path" \
'(.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == $num)).artifacts += [{"path": $path, "type": "plan"}]' \
specs/state.json > specs/tmp/state.json && mv specs/tmp/state.json specs/state.json
fi
Update TODO.md: Link artifact using the automated script:
bash .claude/scripts/link-artifact-todo.sh $task_number '**Plan**' '**Description**' "$artifact_path"
If the script exits non-zero, log a warning but continue (linking errors are non-blocking).
Stage 8a: Lifecycle TTS Notification
Fire TTS and WezTerm tab coloring after artifact linking is complete:
lifecycle_script=".claude/scripts/lifecycle-notify.sh"
if [ -f "$lifecycle_script" ]; then
bash "$lifecycle_script" "$STATE_STATUS" &
fi
Non-blocking: called in background after artifacts are linked. Speaks "Tab N STATUS" (e.g., "Tab 3 planned") to announce the lifecycle transition.
Stage 9: Git Commit
For Plan Revision:
git add -A
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
task {N}: revise plan (v{NEW_VERSION})
Session: {session_id}
EOF
)"
For Description Update:
git add -A
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
task {N}: revise description
Session: {session_id}
EOF
)"
Commit failure is non-blocking (log and continue).
Stage 10: Cleanup
Remove marker and metadata files:
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-pending"
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.postflight-loop-guard"
rm -f "specs/${padded_num}_${project_name}/.return-meta.json"
Stage 11: Return Brief Summary
Return a brief text summary (NOT JSON). Example:
Plan Revision:
Plan revised for task {N}:
- Preserved {X} completed phases, revised {Y} phases
- Integrated {Z} new research reports
- Created revised plan at specs/{NNN}_{SLUG}/plans/MM_{short-slug}.md
- Status updated to [PLANNED]
- Changes committed with session {session_id}
Description Update:
Description updated for task {N}:
- Previous: {old_description}
- New: {new_description}
- Status: [{current_status}] (unchanged)
- Changes committed with session {session_id}
Error Handling
Input Validation Errors
Return immediately with error message if task not found.
Metadata File Missing
If subagent didn't write metadata file:
- Keep status unchanged
- Do not cleanup postflight marker
- Report error to user
Git Commit Failure
Non-blocking: Log failure but continue with success response.
jq Parse Failure
If jq commands fail with INVALID_CHARACTER or syntax error (Issue #1132):
- Log to errors.json
- Retry with two-step pattern (already implemented in Stage 8)
Subagent Timeout
Return partial status if subagent times out (default 1800s). Keep status unchanged for resume.
MUST NOT (Postflight Boundary)
After the agent returns, this skill MUST NOT:
- Edit source files - All revision work is done by agent
- Run build/test commands - Verification is done by agent
- Use research tools - Web/codebase search is for agent use only
- Analyze task requirements - Analysis is agent work
- Write plan files - Artifact creation is agent work
The postflight phase is LIMITED TO:
- Reading agent metadata file
- Updating status via
update-task-status.sh(handles state.json + TODO.md atomically) - Linking artifacts in state.json
- Updating description in state.json/TODO.md (description update path only)
- Git commit
- Cleanup of temp/marker files
Reference: @.claude/context/standards/postflight-tool-restrictions.md
Return Format
This skill returns a brief text summary (NOT JSON). The JSON metadata is written to the file and processed internally.
Decide Fit First
Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review