trailmark-structural
- Repo stars 0
- Author updated Aug 25, 2026, 07:09 AM
- Author repo skills
Trailmark Structural Analysis
Builds a Trailmark graph and runs engine.preanalysis() to compute all
four pre-analysis passes. The core workflow is v0.2-safe; v0.4-only details
are included only after checking method availability, and newer builds
enrich the same output (0.5.0+ adds an attributes key to attack-surface
entries and proxy.external:* nodes from .trailmark/links.toml) without
any workflow change.
When to Use
- Vivisect Phase 1 needs full structural data (hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries)
- Detailed pre-analysis passes for a specific target scope
- Generating complexity and taint data for audit prioritization
- Inspecting proxy/unresolved-call counts, subgraph edges, or type-reference summaries when Trailmark 0.4.0+ is installed
When NOT to Use
- Quick overview only (use
trailmark-summaryinstead) - Ad-hoc code graph queries (use the main
trailmarkskill directly) - Target is a single small file where structural analysis adds no value
Rationalizations to Reject
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |
|---|---|---|
| "Summary analysis is enough" | Summary skips taint, blast radius, and privilege boundary data | Run full structural analysis when detailed data is needed |
| "One pass is sufficient" | Passes cross-reference each other — taint without blast radius misses critical nodes | Run all four passes |
| "Tool isn't installed, I'll analyze manually" | Manual analysis misses what tooling catches | Report "trailmark is not installed" and return |
| "Empty pass output means the pass failed" | Some passes produce no data for some codebases (e.g., no privilege boundaries) | Return full output regardless |
| "A v0.4 field is always present" | Users may still have Trailmark 0.2.x installed | Probe with hasattr() before querying v0.4-only methods |
Usage
The target directory is passed via the args parameter.
Execution
Step 1: Check that trailmark is available.
trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null || \
uv run trailmark analyze --help 2>/dev/null
If neither command works, report "trailmark is not installed"
and return. Do NOT run pip install, uv pip install,
git clone, or any install command. The user must install
trailmark themselves.
Optionally record the version:
trailmark --version 2>/dev/null || uv run trailmark --version 2>/dev/null || true
Do not fail if this command is missing; use API feature probes below.
Step 2: Detect languages with Trailmark's parse API.
python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
from trailmark.parse import detect_languages # canonical location since 0.3.x
except ModuleNotFoundError:
# v0.2.x predates trailmark.parse; the same function lives in query.api
from trailmark.query.api import detect_languages
print(json.dumps(detect_languages(sys.argv[1])))
PY
If the import fails, rerun the same snippet with uv run --with trailmark python - "{args}".
If the result is [], report "Trailmark found no supported languages under
target" and return.
Step 3: Run the full structural analysis via QueryEngine.
Run this snippet with python3. If the import fails, rerun the same snippet
under uv run --with trailmark python - "{args}".
python3 - "{args}" <<'PY'
import json
import sys
try:
from trailmark.parse import detect_languages # canonical location since 0.3.x
except ModuleNotFoundError:
# v0.2.x predates trailmark.parse; the same function lives in query.api
from trailmark.query.api import detect_languages
from trailmark.query.api import QueryEngine
target = sys.argv[1]
languages = detect_languages(target)
engine = QueryEngine.from_directory(target, language="auto")
preanalysis = engine.preanalysis()
def summarize_subgraph(name: str, limit: int = 25) -> dict[str, object]:
nodes = engine.subgraph(name)
summary = {
"count": len(nodes),
"sample_ids": [node["id"] for node in nodes[:limit]],
}
if hasattr(engine, "subgraph_edges"):
summary["edge_count"] = len(engine.subgraph_edges(name))
return summary
graph = json.loads(engine.to_json())
nodes = graph.get("nodes", {})
proxy_nodes = [
node_id for node_id, node in nodes.items()
if node.get("kind") == "proxy" or node.get("origin") == "proxy"
]
payload = {
"languages": languages,
"summary": engine.summary(),
"preanalysis": preanalysis,
"attack_surface": engine.attack_surface()[:25],
"hotspots": engine.complexity_hotspots(10)[:25],
"proxy_nodes": proxy_nodes[:25],
"subgraphs": {
name: summarize_subgraph(name)
for name in engine.subgraph_names()
},
}
if hasattr(engine, "type_references"):
payload["type_reference_samples"] = {
node_id: engine.type_references(node_id)[:10]
for node_id in list(nodes)[:25]
}
print(json.dumps(payload, indent=2))
PY
Step 4: Verify the output.
The output should include:
languagessummarypreanalysishotspots(possibly empty)proxy_nodes(empty on v0.2.x or when there are no unresolved calls; on 0.5.0+ may includeproxy.external:*entries declared in.trailmark/links.toml)subgraphswith counts and sample IDs
On Trailmark 0.5.0+, attack_surface entries may carry an attributes
object (e.g. solidity_visibility, solidity_overridden_by). Pass it
through unchanged — downstream consumers use it to rank entrypoints.
Some subgraphs may have zero nodes for some codebases (this is normal). Return the full JSON payload regardless.
- Fluxly category
- AI
- Author-declared agents
- No explicit declaration found; this is not inferred or tested compatibility
- Static check
- 88 / 100 · heuristic scan, not runtime safety proof
- Author / version / license
- @trailofbits · no license declared
- Fluxly token estimate
- Lean
- Fluxly setup estimate
- Guided setup
- External API key
- No requirement detected
- Detected OS requirements
- macOS · Linux · Windows
- Runtime requirements
- Node.js · Python
- Detected file/system behavior
-
- Read-only
- Shell exec
- Detected network behavior
- Local-only
- Install commands
- None (reference only)
Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.
Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。
The current SKILL.md does not define a fixed output example. Vivisect Phase 1 needs full structural data (hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries) Detailed pre-analysis passes for a specific target scope Generating complexity and taint data for audit prioritization
Quick overview only (use trailmark-summary instead) Ad-hoc code graph queries (use the main trailmark skill directly) Target is a single small file where structural analysis adds no value
Rationalization · Why It's Wrong · Required Action "Summary analysis is enough" · Summary skips taint, blast radius, and privilege boundary data · Run full structural analysis when detailed data is needed "One pass is sufficient" · Passes cross-reference each…
The target directory is passed via the args parameter.
Step 1: Check that trailmark is available. If neither command works, report "trailmark is not installed" and return. Do NOT run pip install, uv pip install,
# Trailmark Structural Analysis
Builds a Trailmark graph and runs `engine.preanalysis()` to compute all
four pre-analysis passes. The core workflow is v0.2-safe; v0.4-only details
are included only after checking method availability, and newer builds
enrich the same output (0.5.0+ adds an `attributes` key to attack-surface
entries and `proxy.external:*` nodes from `.trailmark/links.toml`) without
any workflow change.
## When to Use
- Vivisect Phase 1 needs full structural data (hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries)
- Detailed pre-analysis passes for a specific target scope
- Generating complexity and taint data for audit prioritization
- Inspecting proxy/unresolved-call counts, subgraph edges, or type-reference
summaries when Trailmark 0.4.0+ is installed
## When NOT to Use
- Quick overview only (use `trailmark-summary` instead)
- Ad-hoc code graph queries (use the main `trailmark` skill directly)
- Target is a single small file where structural analysis adds no value
## Rationalizations to Reject
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |
|-----------------|----------------|-----------------|
| "Summary analysis is enough" | Summary skips taint, blast radius, and privilege boundary data | Run full structural analysis when detailed data is needed |
| "One pass is sufficient" | Passes cross-reference each other — taint without blast radius misses critical nodes | Run all four passes |
| "Tool isn't installed, I'll analyze manually" | Manual analysis misses what tooling catches | Report "trailmark is not installed" and return |
| "Empty pass output means the pass failed" | Some passes produce no data for some codebases (e.g., no privilege boundaries) | Return full output regardless |
… Author text anchors workflow facts; Fluxly only indexes current sections, terms, files, and commands.
sections -> When to Use → When NOT to Use → Rationalizations to Reject → Usage → Execution
terms -> Step 1: Check that trailmark is available. · Step 2: Detect languages with Trailmark's parse API. · Step 3: Run the full structural analysis via QueryEngine. · Step 4: Verify the output.
files/cmd -> engine.preanalysis() · attributes · proxy.external: · .trailmark/links.toml · trailmark-summary · trailmark · hasattr() · args
body sha256 -> e84cfe1a1504
Decide Fit First
preanalysis(), and reporting hotspots, taint, blast radiu…Design Intent
How To Use It
Boundaries And Review