video-claw

AI Verified
Fluxly profile Facts only: domain, agents, trust score, runtime, permissions and network
Domain
AI
Compatible agents
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Cline
  • Codex
  • Windsurf
  • Gemini CLI
  • +20
Trust score
94 / 100 · audit passed
Author / version / license
@HITsz-TMG · MIT License
Token usage
Lean
Setup complexity
Guided setup
External API key
Required · Vendor-specific
Operating systems
Unspecified (assume cross-platform)
Runtime requirements
Python
Permissions
  • Read-only
  • Write / modify
Network behavior
External requests
Install commands
26 variants

Profile is derived at build time from SKILL.md and install vectors. Subject to drift from author intent.

Heads up: 未限定 allowed-tools,默认拥有全部工具权限。

Output preview video-claw.preview
---
name: video-claw
description: video-claw/ ← OpenClaw 调用的 skill 根目录 ├── video-claw/ ← 前后端项目代码 │ ├── backend/ ← FastAPI 后端(端口 80…
category: ai
runtime: Python
---

# video-claw output preview

## PART A: Task fit
- Use case: video-claw/ ← OpenClaw 调用的 skill 根目录 ├── video-claw/ ← 前后端项目代码 │ ├── backend/ ← FastAPI 后端(端口 8000) │ │ ├── api/ ← API 路由、Schema 和服务 │ │ ├── models/ ← 模型注册、能力标签和模型调用客户端 requires Vendor-specific API key; runs on Python. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more..
- Inputs: target material, constraints, expected output, and acceptance criteria.
- Evidence boundary: follow “项目结构 / 阶段与停点(含停点0,共7个停点) / 工作流程” and do not present inference as author intent.

## PART B: Execution result
- **01** The card summarizes the use case; runtime output centers on “video-claw/ ← OpenClaw 调用的 skill 根目录 ├── video-claw/ ← 前后端项目代码 │ ├── backend/ ← FastAPI 后端(端口 8000) │ │ ├── api/ ← API 路由、Schema 和服务 │ │ ├── models/ ← 模型注册、能力标签和模型调用客户端 requires Vendor-specific API key; runs on Python. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Cline and 23 more.”.
- **02** When the source has headings, the agent prioritizes “项目结构 / 阶段与停点(含停点0,共7个停点) / 工作流程” so the result follows the author’s structure.
- **03** Typical output includes task judgment, concrete steps, required commands or file edits, validation, and follow-up options.
- **04** Risk context follows the fingerprint: read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.

## Running Rules
- read files, write/modify files; may access external network resources; requires Vendor-specific API keys.
- Validate with a small sample before expanding scope.
- Return the result, validation criteria, and next iteration options.
Interpretation is structured for decision-making; original keeps the upstream SKILL.md unchanged.

Decide Fit First

  • Core job: video-claw/ ← OpenClaw 调用的 skill 根目录 ├── video-claw/ ← 前后端项目代码 │ ├── backend/ ← FastAPI 后端(端口 8000) │ │ ├── api/ ← API 路由、Schema…
  • Best fit: Use it when the task has reusable inputs, steps, and validation criteria rather than a one-off answer.
  • Avoid forcing it: If the source lacks commands, platform support, or external-service evidence, keep those fields unknown instead of guessing.

Design Intent

  • Structure: The skill is organized around “项目结构”, “阶段与停点(含停点0,共7个停点)”, “工作流程”, “1. 本地部署(仅初始化时执行)”, showing how the author expects the agent to judge fit, collect context, and produce verifiable output.
  • Trigger evidence: Prioritize the author’s wording around when to use it, what context to collect, and what output shape to produce.
  • Evidence boundary: Author text states facts, repository files prove commands and paths, and Fluxly only adds fit, limits, and usage judgment.

How To Use It

  • Inputs: Provide target material, scope, expected result, forbidden changes, and validation method.
  • Invocation: Name video-claw directly; if the source includes slash commands, start with the command and then add task context.
  • Validation: Start small and check whether the result follows “项目结构 / 阶段与停点(含停点0,共7个停点) / 工作流程” before expanding.

Boundaries And Review

  • Dependencies: Prepare Vendor-specific API keys before running a full task.
  • Permissions: Declared permissions include read / write; ask the agent to state file, command, and rollback boundaries before acting.
  • Quality bar: A useful result names the deliverable, evidence, and next action. Generic prose means the task needs tighter context.

Discussion

Powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to comment, react, or subscribe.